Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Don't talk to me you're ugly, poor, and short.
This topic contains 71 replies, has 31 voices, and was last updated by 
bagsofsand 2 years, 6 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
This is the evolution of previously apparent female behaviours.
In the past if you hit on a woman and she didnt like it, she would either slap you or get one of her male acquaintances to threaten you. Now she is using daddy government to do this.
MGTOW and technical innovation is man’s response to this female behaviour.
But this is much more frightening than a possible slap for a boy, this is about having his chances of landing a good job being ruined by getting a criminal record. That’s the point, and that’s why is going to have a very different outcome.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
But this is much more frightening than a possible slap for a boy, this is about having his chances of landing a good job being ruined by getting a criminal record. That’s the point, and that’s why is going to have a very different outcome.
You know what is actually frightening; working in the coal mines where the walls around you could collapse at any minute. Or being in the trenches of Germany as a 16 year old boy facing certain death the moment you leave. Boys and men have faced far bigger obstacles and still played the mating game.
The human ego always makes itself think that they are special; hence why so many think that they are themselves in a pivotal point in history where everything will change. It is difficult for the mind to believe that they are not part of something meaningful.
This is history repeating itself; women will push the boundaries of their social control and men will innovate to extend our human boundaries.
Anonymous3I don’t think there ever was really a time when women got hit on and didn’t like it. Outside of blacks and whites in the West, most of the time arranged marriages were practiced. As soon as a woman was old enough, and this was around 14-16, her father would seek out a marriage partner for her, and then pay the man to take her off his hands.
Women were not running around outside, they stayed at home. There were no bars or clubs, there was no work for weak women who could never do anything. There was no affirmative action, no office jobs, no supermarkets, no nightclubs, no malls. There were no brands making high heels and fashionable clothing and handbags. There was no credit system. There weren’t patrolling cops and cameras.
There was a marketplace, where traders from other places would show up with some goods, and that wasn’t going to be every day.
People need to understand modern life is extremely new. When I was a child we didn’t even have touchtone phones, electricity wasn’t reliable like it is today, even for water you had to usually mix it in a basin and there were individual hot and cold faucets, but the hot water might go out so you had to heat it up on a stove sometimes. Something like showering wasn’t necessarily available, I had to dump a bucket over my head when I was young.
I grew up in a major city, and it was extremely dangerous to go out. So you’d usually only travel in groups and during daylight. Actually, even in Europe you can begin to see this type of thing, and women tend to avoid certain areas and hide at home.
The gravy train is probably ending. Women are going to demand to stay at home and will insist on arranged marriages. Because without arranged marriages they can’t get married at all, and without getting married as young virgins no man will take them. When that happens, they will take steps to do what is best for them. The men will still get trapped, but the terms will have to be acceptable as well.
The gravy train is probably ending. Women are going to demand to stay at home and will insist on arranged marriages. Because without arranged marriages they can’t get married at all, and without getting married as young virgins no man will take them. When that happens, they will take steps to do what is best for them. The men will still get trapped, but the terms will have to be acceptable as well.
I don’t see that happening at all. Women are not going to start trying to turn back the clock, they are going to continue to push ‘forward’. There is no reason to get married when you can have the government just take away from men to give to them.
It’s not hard to see that it’s a failed plan, but women never look at the big picture.
I can see a future though where the state provides so much funding to women that you’ll actually start seeing men wanting to marry women for the financial relief. I mean, if a woman it’s getting free family healthcare and $2k tax free in child support from the state or Daddy, then a minimum wage guy might actually be able to cut some of his hours by shacking up with her.
Ok. Then do it.
Anonymous3The gravy train is probably ending. Women are going to demand to stay at home and will insist on arranged marriages. Because without arranged marriages they can’t get married at all, and without getting married as young virgins no man will take them. When that happens, they will take steps to do what is best for them. The men will still get trapped, but the terms will have to be acceptable as well.
I don’t see that happening at all. Women are not going to start trying to turn back the clock, they are going to continue to push ‘forward’. There is no reason to get married when you can have the government just take away from men to give to them.
It’s not hard to see that it’s a failed plan, but women never look at the big picture.
I can see a future though where the state provides so much funding to women that you’ll actually start seeing men wanting to marry women for the financial relief. I mean, if a woman it’s getting free family healthcare and $2k tax free in child support from the state or Daddy, then a minimum wage guy might actually be able to cut some of his hours by shacking up with her.
Western wealth and prosperity is a historical anomaly. It is already completely coming apart at the seams, and I doubt it has much longer to go. You should have seen cities in the 70s and 80s, riddled with graffiti and dangerous to go anywhere. Lots of gang activity. Shacks where people desperately survived in.
It is far more likely the West collapses like every civilization before it, than that we somehow found a new formula for endless prosperity. The West has been utilizing immigration to stem the tide a bit, and Europe is following suit.
But take a look at Japan, which has refused to allow immigration. They have a demographic timebomb and it is going to hit much sooner than everywhere else. If there is time to avoid our fate, it will be because of the massive failure that Japan will be, and the elites getting off their asses to try and fix things. But it’s probably too late.
Also I’m still of the opinion that for the most part, these are intentional policies designed to try and reduce populations and promote wealth inequality, re-creating the class structure of old with a neo-serfdom.
I get how you can look at civilizations of the past and predict that the west will fall in the same way. However, modern advances have changed so much of the rules that it’s really hard to say the same will happen here. The speed of communication and travel changes things dramatically. The power of a government to control it’s population has never been stronger. The level of infrastructure we have isn’t even imaginable to previous civilizations. It changes everything.
I’m not suggesting that we find prosperity, but I don’t think we’ll go into total collapse either.
Personally, I think the only way we ending going back to anything resembling a traditional family where a man actually leads is after a total apocalypse. So much of the population and infrastructure will be gone to the point where a basic family is the only way to survive.
Ok. Then do it.
I mean, if a woman it’s getting free family healthcare and $2k tax free in child support from the state or Daddy, then a minimum wage guy might actually be able to cut some of his hours by shacking up with her.
Err…I am already paying several THOUSANDS every month in taxes, and I am not even self-employed. For that $2k a month you are going to need a lot of middle class people getting a lot of rape. And trust me, if they strangle me just a bit more I will snap.
“The government” does not pay. We do. Not the rich, not the poor, but the middle class. So I am pretty sure the future you are painting “ain’t gonna happen”.
Just follow common sense and you will arrive at destination. Already women began running away from the “feminist” label when 15 minutes ago they showed it like a badge of honor. Already they chant “NAWALT, NAWALT” as if they could magically turn us, real men, into their little slaves…the near future is younger women fighting against older women, “but be sure the camera is on record so male can see we have changed”.
Too little, too late. And I am not an MGTOW monk. I like my free milk, thanks cow.
Anonymous3Every civilization says the same thing. “It won’t happen to us, we are too smart, too progressive, too advanced”. It won’t happen, until it does.
It is all but impossible to break cycles. Our world is full of cycles, in absolutely everything. From nature to economies to civilizations.
I just don’t see how humanity can defeat what seems to be the law of the universe.
I get how you can look at civilizations of the past and predict that the west will fall in the same way. However, modern advances have changed so much of the rules that it’s really hard to say the same will happen here. The speed of communication and travel changes things dramatically. The power of a government to control it’s population has never been stronger. The level of infrastructure we have isn’t even imaginable to previous civilizations. It changes everything.
If we forget the variable of immigration (and this is really an huge “IF”) it becomes very clear that the west is heading towards:
Most people being single, sex and reproduction being more and more done with artificial means, population shriking.
The state becoming narrow and narrower, the market being more and more powerful, to the point that many nations will probably disappear.Immigration, at least in Europe, is the great game changer: the final confrontation will probably be between the above vision of society and a very tradcon islamic vision of society.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Err…I am already paying several THOUSANDS every month in taxes, and I am not even self-employed. For that $2k a month you are going to need a lot of middle class people getting a lot of rape. And trust me, if they strangle me just a bit more I will snap.
First, I think you meant to quote me, not Phoenix. I don’t really care, but just clarification.
I understand that government works off a tax base, but it also works off a deficient, and has no sense of long term planning. If increasing entitlements means increased votes, politicians will make it happen.
Middle class certainly pays a big brunt of taxes, and perhaps it hurts them the most, but the wealthy pay the vast majority of the taxes.
Just follow common sense and you will arrive at destination. Already women began running away from the “feminist” label when 15 minutes ago they showed it like a badge of honor. Already they chant “NAWALT, NAWALT” as if they could magically turn us, real men, into their little slaves…the near future is younger women fighting against older women, “but be sure the camera is on record so male can see we have changed”.
But they are all like that, despite pleading that they are not. I have no doubt that these ‘not feminists’ will push for longer maternity leave, government/corporate funded day care, greater medical coverage for female only expenses, etc.
I see no evidence that anything is going to result in female introspection and actual changed behavior and personal responsibility. It typically is only greater efforts at manipulation and chameleon behavior.
It’s all speculation, no one knows how things are really going to go down. I just can’t see a return to the dowry system though. Women are a financial burden to a man, even if the come with a dowry on the front end. That would probably just be her excuse to spend money faster. And if she isn’t a financial burden, then why would a father to pay to send her a way?
It made sense in the past because women were not allowed to be unproductive. She didn’t have access to the purse, and she had to produce children and care for the home. No choice. You could even argue that a dowry was required to cover her expense until she was able to produce children that actual were a financial positive in those days.
Ok. Then do it.
First, I think you meant to quote me, not Phoenix. I don’t really care, but just clarification.
Apologies!
I understand that government works off a tax base, but it also works off a deficient, and has no sense of long term planning. If increasing entitlements means increased votes, politicians will make it happen.
Sure they will do this, and a year later the deficit will be so huge devaluation will be in order, and…welcome 1929!
Middle class certainly pays a big brunt of taxes, and perhaps it hurts them the most, but the wealthy pay the vast majority of the taxes.
If by “taxes” you are talking about “personal income taxes” then yes, you are right. In fact, poor people even pay negative income taxes. However, we need to add other taxes such as payroll tax, state income tax, sales tax, property tax, etc…
On top of that we have he topic of percentiles. On average the top 1% pays 43% in personal income taxes. In fact, yours truly already pays well over 50% of my income in taxes, so I begin questioning whether I am rich. Anyways, the middle class “supposedly” pays around 25%. Now, say that a rich guy makes USD1m, and a middle class guy makes USD200k. When applying taxes, the rich guy ends up with a bit over 500k, the middle class guy 150k. If both live in the same city, one of them is having way less purchasing power.
I noticed this yesterday shared by someone at ROK on social media.
I don’t have the reference handy right now but there was another article literally BEGGING for men in the UK to “approach women”….. and if you look around , even C~~~Post published “tips” on how to give women attention.
…. as if women even get to DECIDE what attention they get, from whom, when and where.
The last time I overheard a c~~~ bitch about getting unwanted attention, I asked her if she would react that way if it was Justin Bieber or George Clooney, and I told her infant of others how ridiculous she is thinking she gets to CHOOSE what men talks to her, or pays any attention to her at all.
“Here’s what you need to say to me…..”
F~~~ off. Men are not you goddam mind readers. And now they don’t want you to? The female mass of inconsistency on this is exactly why no man should even bother SPEAKING to them. Unbelievable hypocrites.
—- On “Criminalizing Unsuccessful Flirting” —–
“Flirting” is a woman’s job.
I’m dead serious on this.The PUAs seem to have a big problem with this because they are all about “approaching women” which is the dumbest concept as far as I’m concerned. In all of their “teachings” they never even talk about waving a girl over with your hand to come over and talk to YOU. A man shouldn’t be “approaching” women or trying to “flirt” with them in the first place.
That’s what SHE does, and women have become complete s~~~ at it.
I don’t care what woman wants to “be approached”. They are clearly confused. They don’t understand jack s~~~, and it’s apperent by all their lecturing on the topic.
“I want to be approached but only in this way…..”
“He should want me at all times… but act on it only when I’m in the mood.”Men invented dildos for women like this.
Where do you think the expression “go f~~~ yourself” comes from?“Flirting” is what women do. And the FAT ones are “unsuccessful” at it. Criminalize that. Charging every fat female with 50 counts of negligent bonercide… and you have just solved the problem.
—
It’s really simple. If a woman doesn’t look at you and go “YUM!” she doesn’t exist. Ignore all the rest. Now it’s entirely up to her. It obliterates all their nonsense in 2 seconds. If she doesn’t, then she can go home to her goodie drawer and whip out the power tools.
Men have better and more important s~~~ to do.
Don’t talk to me you’re ugly, poor, and short.
I’m not ugly, poor – or short.
But I will NEVER speak to a woman with that s~~~ty attitude.My Dad was 5’4″. I’m 6’2″… and only 4% of men on the planet are 6’2″ and taller. So she can go f~~~ herself. By their standards, I now get to say “don’t talk to me unless you’re a Victoria’s Secret angel”. and have her arrested for even trying.
That’s f~~~ing gold!
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
