DOJ Considering Arresting Sanctuary City Politicians

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/doj-considering-arresting-sanctuary-city-politicians/ar-AAuMYp8?OCID=ansmsnnews11

The Department of Justice is considering subjecting state and local officials to criminal charges if they implement or enforce so-called sanctuary policies that bar jurisdictions from cooperating with immigration authorities. Immigration advocates argue such a move would be illegal.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen made the disclosure Tuesday during a Senate committee hearing on the department’s operations.

“The Department of Justice is reviewing what avenues might be available,” Nielsen said. “The context of this is of course not only putting my [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] officers at risk, but also finding an efficient and effective way to enforce our immigration laws.”

——-Hope Jeff steps up and starts to do something.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22545]

Excellent. I seriously hope they do.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

Imagine how many of these “leaders” will turn over evidence on other people to save their own asses.

[xanthineParticipant 4903]

Cool! I hope those pieces of s~~~ go in general population. They will get a nice sampling of the savages they let in there.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

As per Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctuary_city

In the United States and Canada, a sanctuary city (French: ville sanctuaire, Spanish: ciudad santuario) is a city that limits its cooperation with the national government effort to enforce immigration law. Leaders of sanctuary cities want to reduce the fear of deportation and possible family break-up among people who are in the country illegally so that such people will be more willing to report crimes, use health and social services, and enroll their children in school. Municipal policies include prohibiting police or city employees from questioning people about their immigration status and refusing requests by federal immigration authorities to detain people beyond their release date, if they were jailed for breaking local law.[1] Such policies can be set expressly in law (de jure) or observed in practice (de facto), but the designation “sanctuary city” does not have a precise legal definition. The Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates restrictive immigration policies, estimates that about 300 U.S. jurisdictions, including cities, counties and states, have adopted sanctuary policies.[2]

Opponents of sanctuary cities argue that cities should assist the federal government in enforcing immigration law. Supporters of sanctuary cities argue that enforcement of federal law is not the duty of localities.[3] Legal opinions vary on whether immigration enforcement by local police is constitutional.[4] Studies that investigated the relationship between sanctuary status and crime have found that sanctuary policies either have no effect on crime or that sanctuary cities have lower crime rates and stronger economies than comparable non-sanctuary cities.[5][6][7]

If the net effect of being a sanctuary city makes the city more manageable, then how exactly does threatening to arrest the individuals who manage the cities going to end up reversing policies?

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Anonymous 0]

It seems obvious to me; a Canadian whose entire country is a “Sanctuary City”, that this is just another name for the ghetto’s of the WW2 era.
LolThink about this; during the early stages of the Nazi rule, Jews and other undesirables were rounded up and put into a confined spaces (ghettos) for trans-shipment to the concentration camps where they were murdered. This “Sanctuary” city seems to me to be a ghetto that people go to VOLUNTARILY where they can be identified, watched, reported and deported. Quietly, of course.
I can’t be the only one with such a devious mind. Opinions invited.

[Author]

Posts