Doing reasearch. Need help.

[Soldier-MedicParticipant 2566]

A few years ago I heard of, and saw videos from a man that was supposed to have won a US Supreme Court Case in which he no longer has to pay child support for a child that is not his.

Can you guys help me with a name?

Thanks.

"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

not sure man but I will respond here so that anyone following me will also see this thread. Maybe they know.
Hope you are well

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

I’ve never heard of a case that went to the Supreme Court regarding child support. And I’ve been paying attention for over 20 years.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22521]

I cant find any. Possibly somewhere a state supreme court case for a particular state.

Bottom line is all the states have different laws about paternity and child support, so if there was a scotus case we’d all know about it because it would probably impact a high number of states and their laws.

For example rescinding paternity, all states have their own deadlines and what disqualfies disestablishing payernity. Even if you can get it stopped, you may not be able to recover child support already paid.

Because child support laws do not give one sh1t about the payer. so they legally fukk you over and give you no way to get it back. You could sue the woman in civil court for fraud/swindling, and also adultery if your state still has adultery on the books as a crime – in my state its still a felony.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Try visiting Nolo.com.

From their website:
“Presumed Father

In most states, if a couple was married when the child was conceived or born, the husband is presumed to be the biological father of the child. However, some states invalidate the presumption if the couple was separated at conception or the child’s birth.
In most states, the presumption is “rebuttable,” meaning the man can disprove paternity by filing a legal request with the court.
Depending on your relationship status after the child is born, even unmarried men may face the presumption of fatherhood if any of the following are true:
the man attempted to marry the mother (even if the marriage wasn’t valid) and the child was conceived or born during the attempted marriage
the couple legally married after the child was born and the husband agreed to place his name on the birth certificate or to support the child financially, or
the man welcomed the child into his home and openly held the child out to be his own.
Rebutting presumed paternity is a time-sensitive issue, so it’s essential for a presumed father to meet with an experienced attorney if he feels the presumption is incorrect. Failure to file a timely legal request could result in the court requiring you to pay child support for a child that isn’t biologically yours.”

So according to this, you can rebutt presumed paternity in some states. You would need legal help if you rebutted presumed paternity. Good luck.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Then there is the putative father registry. In most states women have to prove that they made an attempt to contact the father. Women usually take out an ad in the advertising section of some no nothing regional newspaper announcing that the child is born and that he is the father.

If you don’t notice this and don’t have a good attorney paternity is ruled to belong to the man the mother named.

In the United States, putative fathers will be notified when actions to terminate their parental rights as part of adoption proceedings are filed for a child they may have fathered and registered for.[3] Non-marital fathers are not guaranteed notice of an adoption or any rights in contesting the decision by the mother, nor are they guaranteed the ability to adopt or gain custody of the child. Typically, the father is only guaranteed notification, and the right to appear in court to testify about their child’s best interests when he has registered timely.[4] Registering timely with a state’s putative father registry guarantees notice. Timely legal establishment of paternity typically guarantees notice and an opportunity to be heard and may confer rights to consent or withhold consent to adoption. Prenatal support of the mother and fetus assures recognition of parental rights in 34 states.[5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Putative_father_registry

Also, holding yourself out as father even before the baby is born will grant parental rights to the man in 34 states:

Prenatal support of the mother and fetus assures recognition of parental rights in 34 states.[5]

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[SandalsParticipant 4253]

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=create+new+identity&t=ffab&ia=web

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Soldier-Medic wrote:

Supreme Court Case in which he no longer has to pay child support for a child that is not his.

think the one you may be looking for is Matt Dubay.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Dubay_child_support_case

https://web.archive.org/web/20060826000911/http://abclocal.go.com/wjrt/story?section=local&id=3981352

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4789090.stm

Woman advocates for legal document to let men ‘opt out’ of parenthood

From 2006

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/roe-v-wade-for-men-suit-filed/

http://www.nationalcenterformen.org/page7.shtml

http://www.nationalcenterformen.org/page9.shtml

http://www.nationalcenterformen.org/page8.shtml

From N.O.W.

“If the woman changes her mind and wants the child, she should be responsible,” Feit said. “If she can’t take care of the child, adoption is a good alternative.”

The president of the National Organization for Women, Kim Gandy, acknowledged that disputes over unintended pregnancies can be complex and bitter.

“None of these are easy questions,” said Gandy, a former prosecutor. “But most courts say it’s not about what he did or didn’t do or what she did or didn’t do. It’s about the rights of the child.”

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22521]

The court said his argument rested on a false analogy that the child exists for support but not for abortion. ITS CLEAR abortion kills off a human life, just not one outside the woman’s body, yet. We all know it’s a genetically different person, its just not alive outside mommy yet. So the court’s ruling is actually the thing based on a flawed assumption of the libtard left. Science and biology and common sense are on our side. the court ignores these facts to deny men their rights when it suits the liberal gynocentric agenda.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[SandalsParticipant 4253]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

The court said his argument rested on a false analogy that the child exists for support but not for abortion. ITS CLEAR abortion kills off a human life, just not one outside the woman’s body, yet. We all know it’s a genetically different person, its just not alive outside mommy yet. So the court’s ruling is actually the thing based on a flawed assumption of the libtard left. Science and biology and common sense are on our side. the court ignores these facts to deny men their rights when it suits the liberal gynocentric agenda.

Being a father, I can tell you, the word “fetus” is total bullshlt. There is no “fetus”. That is a baby. Those babies are well developed after a couple months. They definitely communicate with the mother and father from inside the womb, and their personalities inside the womb the SAME outside the womb.

[Author]

Posts