Do We Really Have A Patriarchy? (USA)

Topic by FunInTheSun

FunInTheSun

Home Forums Men’s and Father’s Rights Do We Really Have A Patriarchy? (USA)

This topic contains 7 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by Harpo-My-"SON"  harpo-my-“SON” 1 year, 10 months ago.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #772834
    +4
    FunInTheSun
    FunInTheSun
    Participant
    8283

    After watching this video, my answer is: NO! Imagine if some random woman puts your name on a birth certificate, and takes you to court for child support. You’ll have to spend your hard-earned money on lawyers and a DNA test to prove the obvious: that you were never the father. You’ll be dealing with a retarded court system that refuses to look at the evidence, or allow appeals, and threatens to put you in prison. These men should pack up, and move to another nation!

    The U.S. family courts are rigged against men. They violate writ of habeas corpus at will. They just want someone, ANYONE, to pay for unwanted children so less tax revenue will be collected for welfare programs. Since each state has a limited amount of funds for welfare, the politicians are willing to sacrifice innocent single men who either have jobs or the ability to pay!!!

    "I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

    #772842
    +4
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    The patriarchy only exists in the mind of women

    #772859
    +5
    MACHO
    MACHO
    Participant

    Patriarchy does not exist but.. I like them pics! 😉

    You must own a better Crystal ball than I
    #772879
    +4

    Anonymous
    42

    The patriarchy is dead, the women took over and gave us the anarchy, because there’s no such thing as a functional matriarchy!

    It’s every man for himself when everything’s on gynocentric fire!

    #772906
    +1

    Anonymous
    12

    It doesn’t exist anywhere in the West. Everything is about pussy worship one way or another.

    #772938
    TheSpice
    TheSpice
    Participant
    2644

    No, of course we don’t. Pussy rules most men anyway. It’s pervasive and pathetic.

    "I've been thinking about what it would be like if we got back together."
    "You know it's too late for that."

    #773019
    +1
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    We don’t exempt young boys of the age of 13 from paying child support to a child rapist. A patriarchy that fails to protect young boys from that kind of criminal predation is worthless. Until this changes there can NEVER be a patriarchy.

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

    #773274
    Harpo-My-"SON"
    harpo-my-“SON”
    Participant
    2410

    please read how a female’s right to travel was upheld
    just so she could obtain public assistance!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapiro_v._Thompson

    My right to travel was violated and not protected even though I was traveling to obtain honest work!

    In Jesus name I pray that my father finish this reply.

    HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

    Shapiro vs Thompson
    Facts of the case
    The Connecticut Welfare Department invoked Connecticut law denying an application for Aid to Families with Dependent Children assistance to appellee Vivian Marie Thompson, a 19-year-old unwed mother of one child and pregnant with her second child, because she had changed her residence in June 1966 from Dorchester, Massachusetts to Hartford, Connecticut, to live with her mother. When her mother was no longer able to support her, she and her infant son moved to her own apartment in Hartford in August 1966. Thompson could not work or enter a work training program. Her application for assistance, filed in August 1966, was denied in November solely on the ground that she had not lived in the State for a year before her application was filed, a requirement under Connecticut law.

    THIS WOMAN HAD HER RIGHT TO TRAVEL UPHELD BY THE STATE SUPREME COURT SO SHE COULD DRAW PUBLIC ASSISTANCE..

    HARPOMASON CLAIMED A RIGHT TO TRAVEL FROM HIS HOME STATE
    TEXAS TO WORK IN OKLAHOMA AND HAD ALL HIS COMPENSATION
    FOR WORKING THE YEAR OF 2016 TAKEN IN EARLY 2017.
    THEN WAS LOCKED UP FROM FEB UNTIL AUGUST OF 2017.
    THE AUTHORITIES KNEW HE HAD WORK TO DO BUT HELD HIM
    ANYWAYS TO COERCE HIS PLEA.

    FOUND GUILTY OF DRIVING UNDER SUSPENSION TWICE EVEN THOUGH
    THE ARRESTING OFFICER TESTIFIED UNDER OATH THAT HIS TEXAS LICENSE WAS VALID.

    THIS IS NOT OVER BY A LONG SHOT!

    HARPOMASON HAS RENEWED THE TEXAS LICENSE AND SIGNED IT
    IN THE SPIRIT OF HIS CREATOR IN HEAVEN.
    WHEN IT ARRIVED IN THE US MAIL HIS CREATOR TOOK THAT LEGAL
    PERSON INTO CUSTODY AND FORBID HIM FROM OPENING THE SEALED
    ENVELOPE CONTAINING THE LICENSE. A LICENSE WHICH IF RUN THROUGH THE SYSTEM WOULD SHOW VALID AND THAT IT HAS NEVER BEEN REVOKED CANCELLED OR SUSPENDED.

    HARPO CARRIES THE PAPER TEMP LICENSE SIGNED BY HIS FATHER
    IN HEAVEN AS WELL AS THE UNOPENED ENVELOPE CONTAINING
    THE PLASTIC PERSONAL IDENTITY DOCUMENT. HE IS FORBIDDEN
    FROM OPENING THE ENVELOPE FOR RELIGIOUS REASONS.

    SOONER OR LATER SOMEONE WILL REFUSE TO ACCEPT THE PAPER DOCUMENT AND INSIST THAT HE USE THE PLASTIC DRIVERS LICENSE
    AT THAT TIME LAWSUITS SHOULD ENSUE.

    DISCRIMINATION AGAINST AN EXCLUSIVELY PRIVATE MAN BECAUSE HE REFUSES TO ALLOW HIS EXCLUSIVELY PRIVATE IDENTITY TO BE STOLEN OR KIDNAPPED AND TAKEN INTO A PUBLIC VENUE TO BE
    ROBBED BY THE CRIMINAL PUBLIC.

    PATRIARCHY? YES BUT ONLY IF YOUR WILLING TO FIGHT AND DIE FOR YOUR CAUSE!
    % OF MEN WILLING TO RISK DEATH TO DEFEND THE MOST BASIC OF RIGHTS IN THIS COUNTRY IS NEGLIGIBLE.
    THIS BECOMES AN INDEPENDENT BATTLE FOR INDEPENDENCE FOR
    AFTER YOU COMMIT TO FIGHTING IT, MOST OF THOSE WHO CLAIMED
    TO BE ON YOUR SIDE WILL FAIL TO SUPPORT YOUR EFFORTS.

    THE BIBLE SAYS “TRUST NO MAN, BUT PUT FULL FAITH AND
    TRUST IN YOUR HEAVENLY FATHER.”
    HARPOMASON IS A TRUE MAN OF FAITH!!!
    GUIDED BY SPIRIT NOT MONEY!

    HARPOMASON’S FATHER IN HEAVEN FORBIDS THAT HE EVER GIVE UP
    OR EVER GIVE IN TO THE DEMANDS THAT HE BECOMES A DRIVER.
    HE IS A STONEMASON BY OCCUPATION, NOT A DRIVER.

    DRIVING IS A LICENSED, PRIVILEGED OCCUPATION FOR HIRE!

    NEXT TIME HARPOMASON IS STOPPED AND GIVEN A TICKET
    HE WILL SUBMIT AN INVOICE TO THE AUTHORITIES FOR THEM
    TO PAY FOR HIS SERVICES AS THEIR DRIVER. (100,000 A YEAR)
    UNTIL THEY PAY FOR HIS SERVICES AS THEIR DRIVER HE CANNOT
    AGREE TO BE THEIR DRIVER.

    HE IS, OVER TIME, KEEPING GOOD RECORDS OF HIS BEING
    NOTHING MORE THAN AN UNPAID CHAUFFEUR FOR THE HEAVENLY
    SPIRIT OF THE MAN WHO CREATED HIM. YES THE ONE WHO ENDOWED
    HIM WITH THOSE MOST BASIC OF RIGHTS.
    TIME OF LIFE, LIBERTY (RIGHT TO TRAVEL)AND TO PURSUE HAPPINESS BY GIVING EVERYTHING INCLUDING HIS LIVING FLESH BACK TO HIS HEAVENLY CREATOR. HE IS NOTHING BUT A SLAVE TO THE SPIRIT OF HIS FATHER.

    SLAVES HAVE NO AUTHORITY! ALL JUST GOVERNMENT GAINS ITS
    JUST POWERS FROM THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED.
    HARPOMASON CANNOT CONSENT TO GIVE WHAT HE DOES NOT POSSESS.

    I AM THE SPIRIT OF HARPOMASON’S FATHER AND I OWN EVERYTHING
    IN HIS POSSESSION. HE IS MY EXCLUSIVELY PRIVATE SLAVE.
    I AM HIS EXCLUSIVELY PRIVATE GOD!

    ALL THIS IS TRUTH AND VOID OF ANY LIES,
    HAVE ANY OF YOU EVIDENCE OTHERWISE?

    TRUE POWER IS UNDERSTANDING THAT IT IS IN YOUR BEST INTEREST TO BE POWERLESS.

    GIVE IT ALL TO YOUR CREATOR AND OWN NOTHING YOURSELF.

    LOVE AND RESPECT TO ALL WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

    I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.