Disney, a bane to MGTOW?

[RennieParticipant]

uchibenkei wrote:

Remember little mermaid? Feminists got all angry because Ariel had to use her sexuality and body language to lure and seduce the prince. “What a terrible message to send to girls that using your body is how you attract men”. Like Disney just made that up and women had never done that before. After that, Disney’s movies catered more towards girls because feminists will complain, men will not. Every little f~~~ing girl I know thinks she is a Disney princess. It’s sickening. Princess empowerment is not the same as empowerment. Empowerment should be someone improving themselves and their abilities to be able to do more and accomplish their goals and dreams. Princess empowerment is just giving someone power over others so they can accomplish your goals for you. The princess image that Disney perpetuates is not empowering to women. It’s entitlement.

I was thinking of that one too, don’t like it at all. The message is that dad is a controlling dick, who doesn’t understand his daughter, doesn’t know whats good for her and that the daughter knows better than him.

Russky wrote:

You gotta let us draw c~~~s on her!

[mgtow_85Participant 752]

Disney will always be a pain in the ass as long as it makes women believe that THEY will be rescued by a “Prince Charming” and making them have Disney fantasies about marriage instead of the cold, harsh truth of it. Everyone thinks getting married means living “happily ever after” automatically just because they have a ring on their finger. They don’t realize that marriage is a s~~~hole swamp that you have to navigate through provided that there isn’t any quicksand patches, which you have to struggle through day by day, year after year. Marriage doesn’t guarantee happiness, but as long as countless generations continue to be brainwashed by Disney movies portraying all marriages as a “happy ever after” ending, Disney is to blame for a major part of the modern-day s~~~ty marriages.

Get used to the fact that there is no such thing as “prince charming” in real life, that we aren’t knights in shining armor on a white horse, and that we don’t all live in castles and have to subject our wives to a “happy ever after” story in a lifestyle of royalty with a castle and a kingdom.

Thanks a lot, you f~~~ing Disney pricks. Thanks to you, it’s impossible to undo 75 years of your brainwashing fairy tales.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Disney is dangerous. Not kidding.

Ariel the Mermaid = totally unable to “stand on her own two feet”, daydreams like crazy, pouts to get what she wants, tantrums, deceit. Major attention whore. Generic male (prince) whisks her away into his future for no apparent reason whatsoever.

Snow White Asleep for a f~~~ing hundred years. Good looking but totally useless. High status male prince expected to come along, kiss her exactly the way she wants, and snaps her out of it and carries her off for no goddam reason.

Belle (Beauty and the Beast) – Same exact story as the Phantom of the Opera with minor tweaks. Gaston (bad boy) doesn’t end up f~~~ing her though. She pretends to be turned off by him, but if it were real life, she would definitely blow him in a toilet somewhere.

WALL*E – “Nice guy”. Eve the white feminist robot destroys everything in her path. Cold and unfeeling. Total bitch. Amused by his silly attempts at romance. None of them work.

ALADDIN – Sees spoilt bitch who’s “not impressed” in the marketplace and jaw hits the floor just because she’s pretty. He trips over his words and can’t even put a goddam sentence together. Swear to god this is why guys are “afraid to approach women”. It’s ingrained in their psyches since they are 4. Takes her for a magic carpet ride across the world. She acts like she knows better about EVERYTHING. Aladdin adopts PUA strategies and peac~~~s as “Prince Ali” to give the illusion that he’s a high status male.

I could go on.

The social dynamics that are pumped into 5 year old heads from this s~~~ is totally damaging to forming minds during early development. It’s set up to be “cute” because they are cartoons, but even SHREK (Dreamworks®) is loaded with this s~~~ too. Cameron Diaz plays annoying entitlement princess who expects some prince to climb to the highest room in the tallest tower just to get some trim. Is all p~~~ed off because the story doesn’t pan out exactly as she expects it to.

You know what the fire-breathing dragon represents?
EVERY WOMAN’S INNER BITCH.

You have to slay that first… then – only then – do you get to proceed. And it’s all uphill. But if he had any MGTOW sense, he would keep her fire-breathing dragon as a pet, rearrange the furniture, kiss her and LEAVE. She’ll snap out of it eventually.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Governor Megachris%Participant 3584]

uchibenkei wrote:

Remember little mermaid? Feminists got all angry because Ariel had to use her sexuality and body language to lure and seduce the prince. “What a terrible message to send to girls that using your body is how you attract men”. Like Disney just made that up and women had never done that before.

I saw a post on Tumblr about women complaining that Ursula should get a live action movie treatment like Maleficent did.

They said how Ursula “taught Ariel a lesson.”  When she took Ariel’s voice in exchange for legs, she was “teaching Ariel that she can either have a voice or have lady parts, but not both.”  They then also said how Ursula would never get a live action movie because she’s too overweight and “that’s shamed by society and patriarchy today!”

If I remember reading once, the original script/a deleted scene explain that Triton and Ursula were siblings, and Ursula got greedy and wanted the kingdom to herself.  Either way, Ursula was evil and wasn’t sympathetic!  Then again, Maleficent was the same way.  She was pure evil in Sleeping Beauty, but they made her pathetically sympathetic and used emotions from the audience to make her into this “justified villain.”  I’m all for a story with a sympathetic villain (I tend to like those characters), but no.  Maleficent is supposed to be pure evil.  Her name even implies “malevolence.”

Also, @keymaster it’s funny you mention Belle, as I was just talking about WHY she chose the Beast (Prince Adam) over Gaston.  While Gaston may have the qualities of what a woman wants physically and he has popularity, he’s not high in literal status as the Beast is (who is a PRINCE, and likely has loads of finances to spend at her wish).

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[JollyMisanthropeParticipant 3356]

From Tradcon to feminist. Disney fairy tale movies have always sucked a big dick.

Old school Donald Duck for life. Hell, even old school Goofy and Mickey Mouse were great. Then Mickey got his b~~~~ cut off when his chick was introduced. Old school Mickey could be a moody prick, especially when Donald was trolling him. Classic stuff.

The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I only show my daughter the classics – Donald Duck, Looney Tunes (Daffy is her favorite), Tom & Jerry. Original Ninja Turtles – s~~~ like that.
But my ex force feeds her crap like Disney princesses, Barbie and other f~~~ed up s~~~. I have to constantly deprogram her from all the princess bulls~~~.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Author]

Posts