Dinner Prostitution – Meal Tickets

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

I had to attend a family birthday at a new restaurant in the city. Typical over-priced establishment where you should get four times the amount of food for the price you pay but I had to do the ‘family’ thing. During my four hours at the restaurant I watched numerous couples come in for dinner, have their fill and make their way to the till. Not once did I see a woman present her card for payment or offer any cash toward the tab. Each and every time the man, chest puffed out and acting all alpha-maleish, would pay for the meal as the woman stood back and read messages on her smartphone, scrolled through Fakebook, played with her hair and generally avoided seeing the costly bill. We are talking about dozens of couples here – not one woman pitched in.

I thought nothing about this in my blue-pill days, but through red-pill eyes all I could see was how rampant this meal-ticket prostitution is. I saw no ‘ladies’ leave the premises, all I could see were prostitutes using the potential for sex later in the evening as reward for having some beta chumps pay for their meal, drinks and cab-ride. Where are all the so called ’independent’ women the feminazis rave on about?

I found it quite humorous and viewed the men leaving that restaurant as uber-pathetic given that later in the night most of these women would be too drunk or tired to f~~~, or would just lay back on the bed, spread their legs and expect multiple orgasms from oral and missionary while essentially lying on their back thinking of England. Next time you are out at a restaurant, keep an eye on the till and witness all the meal ticket whores, meal-ticket whores everywhere. #ManOut
.

.

Oh, and relations~~~s in a nutshell –
.

#ManOut

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Oz-Bloke wrote:

pay for the meal as the woman stood back and read messages on her smartphone, scrolled through Fakebook, played with her hair

This is one of the worst aspects of modern day women. They will think absolutely NOTHING of playing w/their smart phone, even taking SELFIES (excluding the guy she is with/ONLY TAKES A PIC OF HERSELF AND HER FOOD) or short videos, all to post to snap chat, fake book, instagram etc; all knowing the guy is going to pay for the entire thing. Talk about self-absorbed and narcissistic. It’s insane. I don’t know why any man puts up with this s~~~. It would be one thing if the ‘date’ was enjoying the moment and wanted to take a picture of the two of you together, but it seems that’s even more rare these days. All they care about is themselves and bragging to everyone on social media.

Oz-Bloke wrote:

Where are all the so called ’independent’ women the feminazis rave on about?

They’re only interested in being the recipient of anything benificiary while eschewing anything adverse.

Oz-Bloke wrote:

would just lay back on the bed, spread their legs and expect multiple orgasms from oral and missionary

This is virtually every woman’s idea of ‘sex’. Then some of them have the b~~~~ to complain that some guys are “bad at sex”; wtf? There are exceptions, but for the most part women expect men to do all of the f~~~ing work.

If she doesn’t even do the work, she’s worse than a prostitute. She’s just letting you borrow her vagina for an hour or two to masturbate in.

American Made – that was actually a good movie, even though I hate Tom Cruise. But ya, if any blue pilled man watched that scene it would simply be business as usual to them…Nothing to see here…This is normal. If your one of us, it’s just another sickening display of the females attitude.

Resident cynic.

[Branched offParticipant 10920]

This is simply normal human female behaviour. Of itself it is not deserving of being criticised. Women want to see males lavishing resources on them. These are the males they will spend time with and mate with (except very high status males or very high value genetic males).

The only reason we criticise normal healthy female behaviour is because females are not keeping their side of the natural bargain. They are not mating when asked to by their mates. They are not acting submissively and helpfully to their mates. Instead they are often dominating their mates and controlling them with their negative emotions, which they now hold to be their mate’s responsibilities. They are no longer helping their mates but they are living almost entirely selfishly, gathering their own resources and controlling their own fertility. they have come to regard their mates as resources not mates.

The resource seeking behaviour is not the thing to criticise, nor is the female double standards of wanting rights beyond nature but not accepting any responsibilities in return (they were ever known throughout history for a capacity for duplicity manipulation). The problem is not natural human female behaviour it is the lack of natural human male behaviour. The problem in the end, gentlemen, is the men of this age. They are not asking to be treated fairly and they have been raised by women to expect unfair treatment as normal.

Our grandfathers gave women all the rights they should not have had while knowing their nature. The women asked and the men gave. Then the women trained their sons to become cucks.

Now it is time things changed. The men have to ask for their rights too and if their requests are refused, they need to simply walk away and let the women enjoy their own resources without access to male help resources and protection.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Branched off wrote:

This is simply normal human female behaviour. Of itself it is not deserving of being criticised.

I disagree. I find plenty to be criticized, irrespective of how much we want to call it ‘natural’ or not.

Branched off wrote:

the resource seeking behaviour is not the thing to criticise, nor is the female double standards of wanting rights beyond nature but not accepting any responsibilities in return

I disagree. So what, do you think the ONLY party to be blamed here is once again – men? F~~~ that.

Women screeched and screamed stating they were: strong, independent, and could do anything that men do. They got their rights, now they’re open to criticism.

I don’t care if someone is duplicitous by nature, that doesn’t mean they’re immune to criticism.

Resident cynic.

[Anonymous 12]

I love the ones who even make themselves scarce come bill paying time. At least stand next to me bitch!

[Branched offParticipant 10920]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Branched off wrote:

This is simply normal human female behaviour. Of itself it is not deserving of being criticised.

I disagree. I find plenty to be criticized, irrespective of how much we want to call it ‘natural’ or not.

Branched off wrote:

the resource seeking behaviour is not the thing to criticise, nor is the female double standards of wanting rights beyond nature but not accepting any responsibilities in return

I disagree. So what, do you think the ONLY party to be blamed here is once again – men? F~~~ that.

Women screeched and screamed stating they were: strong, independent, and could do anything that men do. They got their rights, now they’re open to criticism.

I don’t care if someone is duplicitous by nature, that doesn’t mean they’re immune to criticism.

I wanted to take a different angle on this. I found it powerful in its view. Women screeched and screamed and asked for rights they should not have been given. Who were the dumb asses who gave them the rights without demanding that they fulfil the responsibilities? Who has to stop being a dumb ass?

I am coming to see that it is expecting more of women than they are capable of to get them to stop natural hypergamous, resource gaining behaviour.

Of course they are not immune to criticism. They are doing very badly. They must be criticised for it. But in the end this will not stop by asking a woman to be reasonable and responsible. This will stop by men withdrawing resources.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Branched off wrote:

But in the end this will not stop by asking a woman to be reasonable and responsible. This will stop by men withdrawing resources.

You’re looking for a solution. I’m not.

The genie’s out of the bottle and there’s no putting him back in.

It’s not going to stop, and men withdrawing their resources on a universal level is not going to happen.

Not a problem, because I’m just walking away. But at the very least I want to be able to come here and discuss it/vent about it, w/out hearing from other men that it’s “all man’s fault” .

Branched off wrote:

Who were the dumb asses who gave them the rights without demanding that they fulfil the responsibilities?

It was a gradual process, not the flip of a switch to the full blown situation we have today.

I cringe every time I see blue pill/white knights being door mats and enabling women; but that’s never going to stop on a universal scale.

Men have already curbed more than our share of the responsibilities and blame. Placing any more blame on them at this point is adding insult to injury.

Women are CAPABLE of choosing to behave differently (even with male enablers), but they don’t. That’s their fault not mine.

Resident cynic.

[AussieParticipant 2509]

I had one ( who I have never met and never will) say to me “it’s not like it’s diamonds” when I said I had no interest in paying for a dinner whore.

" I feel threatened "

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22503]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Branched off wrote:

This is simply normal human female behaviour. Of itself it is not deserving of being criticised.

I disagree. I find plenty to be criticized, irrespective of how much we want to call it ‘natural’ or not.

Branched off wrote:

the resource seeking behaviour is not the thing to criticise, nor is the female double standards of wanting rights beyond nature but not accepting any responsibilities in return

I disagree. So what, do you think the ONLY party to be blamed here is once again – men? F~~~ that.

Women screeched and screamed stating they were: strong, independent, and could do anything that men do. They got their rights, now they’re open to criticism.

I don’t care if someone is duplicitous by nature, that doesn’t mean they’re immune to criticism.

Exactly, a lot of this supposed “natural” behavior is learned behavior in the gynocentric society we live in, and the girls see it in tradcon families and in feminist families. Because its about control, and its about female conditional love based on male resources/utility. And tv and movies and womens and the gyno-based media and gyno-focused advertisers all reinforce it.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Branched offParticipant 10920]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Not a problem, because I’m just walking away.

It sounds like you have done as I said and withdrawn your resources.

I agree that we got here through nudges and if we ever get back to sanity it will be that way too. There will not be a mass strike of male resource providers but the more men who turn away from the broken system the more difference it makes. Complaints make a difference too, because they reach the ears of other men who have not seen the light, so complain all you like.

I am not telling you can’t blame women or discuss it without being told it is your fault. It is not your fault. You did not make all those dumb laws. You did not make gynocentric society.

However my point is still valid -women who have been known from ancient times for their lack of accountability will not change their position just because men say they are acting unfairly in displaying natural hypergamous resource gaining behaviours.

We can rant all we like and we should be allowed to do this but it will not actually change them. What they do pay great attention to and change their behaviour for is resources. They will do almost anything for resources. It is just these days, thanks to gynocentric society they do not have to.

The resources are provided by the men and nothing is asked for in return because men have come to expect nothing. What you are rightly bitter about is the fact that they do not give anything worthwhile back.

Society does influence gender behaviours a little but the feminists are wrong when they say that gendered behaviour is entirely a societal construct. Some gendered behaviour is innate. You didn’t want to dress up in the Cinderella dress when you were little did you? But every little girl wants the handsome prince to take her to the ball.

What is Cinderella going to do in return? is my question. At the moment she does bugger all and then , if she likes, she takes the palace and boots the prince out. That is what I want to see change. I want to see Cinderella actually doing something the prince wants instead of making the story all about her. Till then the prince would do better to go hunting with his mates.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Repeat after me, gentlemen, “Separate checks, please!”

[joetechParticipant]

I saw a video and read some articles about women who date men just for free meals. As one article says, you know you’re in trouble when you peek into her phone and find out that she named you Tuesday.

"Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

[Anonymous 42]

I haven’t spent a penny on a woman since Bill Clinton was president!

A penny saved is a penny not wasted on a self-entitled c~~~!

It’s never too late to go f~~~ yourself…

[Author]

Posts