Death of Eros

Topic by usairman

Usairman

Home Forums MGTOW Central Death of Eros

Tagged: 

This topic contains 8 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by Goodkid43  goodkid43 2 years, 4 months ago.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #611437
    +4
    Usairman
    usairman
    Participant
    35

    I found some MGTOW and Redpill concepts in this article. Enough similarity to make me think author is aware of both.

    Thought I’d share for those that wanted to dissect and discuss.

    Thanks all.

    https://www.firstthings.com/article/2017/10/the-death-of-eros

    #611456
    +2
    Romulus
    Romulus
    Participant
    4667

    I read the article and I agree with you that the author must be somewhat aware of the MGTOW concept. I found it interesting that the “experts” quoted were women, and there isn’t really any explanation from a man. Interesting how we always get relationship advise from women. I would add that I disagree with the analysis that education or income levels are a factor. Women sell their pussy, whether in a marriage or dating. You have to have something they want and they will barter pussy access with you. If you don’t have anything they want, like your money or property, hard to crack open that access gate.

    How can a woman be expected to be happy with a man who insists on treating her as if she were a perfectly normal human being.

    #611460
    +2
    TaxGuy
    TaxGuy
    Participant

    To understand why this is, we need to turn to Gary Becker, an economist who won a Nobel Prize for his study of the economic principles behind human interactions. He documented how the benefits of marriage receded as women’s earning power rose relative to that of men. The years between 1973 and 1983 were decisive. In that decade, young women’s wages climbed steadily while men’s actually fell, never to recover. Women had less reason to marry, and they had less attractive mates should they nonetheless decide to. Though women had often entered marriages for financial reasons, many nonfinancial benefits followed, including the formation of a stable, intimate relationship with a spouse and the sense of purpose that comes with raising a family. These are things that no job—however lucrative—can deliver.

    Money, it’s all about money for women. Makes me laugh every time I read something like this. Women have less reason to marry now. Men marry for love and companionship, women marry for money. One more article telling you that women are whores, pure and simple. I hope our young new friend from earlier today is reading this. They only marry you for your utility, they don’t CARE one bit about YOU. Women’s earning powers rose, so they had less reason to marry.

    Order the good wine

    #611461
    +5
    TaxGuy
    TaxGuy
    Participant

    Read this one more time. Gary Becker won a Nobel Prize for his study of the economic principles behind human interactions. What was his conclusion? Women are whores. He got a f~~~ing Nobel Prize for that s~~~.

    Order the good wine

    #611484
    +3
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    Don’t care—my libido died a noble death 30 years ago and I don’t miss it at all. Good riddance.

    #611544
    +1
    GregB0
    GregB0
    Participant

    Millions of years ago or today, it remains about the resources. Always has and always will.

    ​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland

    #611597
    +2

    Despite all the talk of the “hookup culture,” the vast majority of sex happens within long-term, well-defined relationships.

    True, if you exclude marriages.

    Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

    #611600
    +2

    Anonymous
    3

    Despite all the talk of the “hookup culture,” the vast majority of sex happens within long-term, well-defined relationships.

    True, if you exclude marriages.

    People always lie about sex, height and wealth. Even if it’s glaringly obvious, and easily disprovable, people would all rather double down and not call the lie.

    Reminds me of that one Seinfeld episode where George lies about a home in the Hamptons, and then has to drive Susan’s parents all the way to the end of Long Island before he finally admits he lied.

    When you don’t punish liars, but instead protect them, this type of thing eventually always happens. And since women always lie, that means you have to punish women first and foremost immediately and severely. Feminism destroys everything, because it is nothing other than Satan worship.

    #611840
    +1
    Goodkid43
    goodkid43
    Spectator
    550

    In my cherished library of over 1500 books (mostly non fiction), I have a section of First Things Magazine from 1992 to 2005. I consider these to be a accurate source of religion, philosophy, history and literature. Having said that, the real issues of a loss of Eros are not addressed i.e.

    The C~~~ Carousel (I hate to be so crude but find this term to be most accurate)

    The perverted imbalance in the legal system that favors women. This results in no incentive for women to develop a proper Eros in her marriage because of the “out” of cash and prizes for her lack of effort.

    The reason sex is so bad in the bedroom is because women have had twenty to thirty sex partners. This has done irreparable harm to women. The article, I would argue is still, “blue pill”, because of the false assumption that women making more money is the problem. It is not.

    The “death of Eros” is caused because the fantastic sex that the women had with “Chad” will always be the standard of measure by which she measures sex with her husband.

    God bless, Michael

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.