Dating apps fuelling rise in casual sex.

[Sky-OParticipant 18936]

That’s great, but with all of this technology changing ‘dating’ (f~~~ing) –

I’m still waiting for an app that enables a woman to verify her consent to engage in sexual intimacy after she logs in, confirms information, types of sexual acts & the guy she is with. That can be used as evidence she consented.

Not exactly holding my breath on that, because it would put the false rape industry out of business.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

I did just read the article clickbait confirmed.

Dr Rosevear said most were ‘regular’ men and women, who are isolated at home and use the internet to arrange multiple sexual encounters to fill the void of intimacy that their lack of social interactions created.

Bulls~~~.
The communication skills required are almost the same, you just have lesser limitations about some things.
Again: personal example. Never had been on a dating site in a serious way, I had been a profile and checked it twice or thrice, never answered to a single message. But I know how it works because I actually have a “relationship” with a 24 yo girl in Australia. Cybersex through videocalls. Communication skills and some efforts are required before viewing her masturbating on your 84″ screen. She have to trust you before doing it.
I bet, and that’s a win for sure, that she would need even more trust before meeting a guy in person, because, you know, if bad things happens on videocall you have just to click on the remote control to turn off the screen, or a click with the mouse to stop the video call. Not the same when it’s for real…

The advantages being that you can eat garlic and smoke the cigar and she doesn’t even know that you did it 😀

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 42]

Is there word to describe disease past pandemic?

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Sky-O wrote:

I’m still waiting for an app that enable a woman to verify her consent to engage in sexual intimacy after she logs in, confirms information, types of sexual acts & the guy she is with. That can be used as evidence she consented.

Not exactly holding my breath on that, because it would put the false rape industry out of business.

Just hide a camera within your bedroom, at least an audio recorder.
You don’t need to record her consent nor even the sex act.
You just need to record her reaction AFTER the sex act.
She has no way to know that you did it unless she firstly falsely accuses you.
The only problem being that with the camera you need to be in your home, the audio recorder is more flexible but provide less proof – still enough in most likely to happen situations.

PS: best reaction to prove is a false accusation isn’t her smiling and hugging you.
It’s her complaining about the fact that she didn’t reach the orgasm.
That last one cannot be construed as being “shocked”/”Stockholm Syndrome” and all the bulls~~~, nor even the most extreme radfem would dare to try.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[ExecrationParticipant 1496]

Anonymous wrote:

Is there word to describe disease past pandemic?

Predator female

[Sky-OParticipant 18936]

LOL

Good luck getting a judge to allow a conversation (of unconfirmed date and time) to be admitted as evidence at a rape trial.

All she has to do is say that the audio was from about a week prior to the night the forced intercourse occurred.

And as far as a court being able to confirm the other voice is even the same woman. That is another issue.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Anonymous wrote:

Once a woman has had more than 5 to 8 c~~~s preferably less than 3, she is worthless. I’m speaking of a woman my age 50 too.

I’d agree…its funny talking about the super skanks but it really doesn’t take that many c~~~s to break a woman. I’ve seen plenty of research that the more partners prior to marriage women have beyond like 2-3…the more likely they will get divorced, and the more partners they have lived with prior to marriage, the more likely they will get divorced. If I were to have a 28 year old interested in me that claimed she only had 5 partners but she lived with a couple of them…its not even a ridiculous amount of c~~~s but regardless chance of divorce due to her past would be well over the 50% average.

Hopping from one c~~~ to the next or moving from one guys house to the next obviously becomes easier the more times they have done it, and we all know a marriage contract means absolutely jack s~~~ these days other than when they want to f~~~ off(literally) you have to pay them.

[surferdudeParticipant 159]

Sure rise in casual sex for women, but I doubt that young men today have more sex than the previous generation.

Sex is everywhere today, except in the bed room .

[President CamachoParticipant 941]

We are less than a decade away from a super brutal STD that will sterilize millions. I can’t wait for that day to arrive.

A Western marriage that survives in the current year is an act of mercy and compassion by the woman.

[Anonymous 11]

Beer wrote:

I’ve seen plenty of research that the more partners prior to marriage women have beyond like 2-3

It’s the reason a woman’s virginity was formerly protected in the West.

I know of one wench whose neighborhood Chad popped her cherry at age 14. He died in his early 50’s. She weirdly attended his funeral though she had nothing to do with him for 36 years. I could tell from speaking to her that he still had a psychological hold on her. My first girlfriend was killed in a car accident many years later. Did I attend her funeral? Umm…Hell, no!

I say it had better not be more than 2. She’s a widow, and you’re number 2.

Don’t worry PC, the super STD is evolving right now. I too cannot wait. I fear that is the only thing that can throw a spanner into the gears of the c~~~ carousel.

Here is where Tinder life will take them to 1100 f~~~ing cats:

[SolidParticipant 7520]

Dating apps, the best place to find c~~~s full of STDs.
AWALT, but dating apps are the trash bin of human kind, expect the worst type of c~~~s there !

[narwhalParticipant]

Beer wrote:

I’d agree…its funny talking about the super skanks but it really doesn’t take that many c~~~s to break a woman. I’ve seen plenty of research that the more partners prior to marriage women have beyond like 2-3…the more likely they will get divorced, and the more partners they have lived with prior to marriage, the more likely they will get divorced. If I were to have a 28 year old interested in me that claimed she only had 5 partners but she lived with a couple of them…its not even a ridiculous amount of c~~~s but regardless chance of divorce due to her past would be well over the 50% average.

I’m not challenging your stats, I just don’t think it really matters. I’m not interested in marrying or co-habituating, so why I do care what her odds of success are for these?

Even if did consider something of this nature, I would want years of knowing her before I did anything like that. At that point, I would think I would know enough about her personally to understand the odds for her specifically.

I’m not saying her sexual past is irrelevant, or that’s stats don’t matter, just that it doesn’t really have much impact on my ‘final decision’ to not marry or cohabitate. The odds of me living happily with a virgin vs a slut are pretty close to identical.

Ok. Then do it.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

narwhal wrote:

I’m not saying her sexual past is irrelevant, or that’s stats don’t matter, just that it doesn’t really have much impact on my ‘final decision’ to not marry or cohabitate. The odds of me living happily with a virgin vs a slut are pretty close to identical.

Yeah I agree…its just a slutty past is one more reason on the long list of reasons to never marry.

[Anonymous 5]

The fine print: will slowly destroy your life, slowly.

The Mgtow response: sheilds max charge- repellent engaged.

[PhilandryParticipant 538]

Lurch, Australia is already screwed.
if we had one woman with a weaponized infection she could clean out all the other pains in the ass their cucks white knights and manginas…It might just save us.

Being a man is incredible good luck. Do not waste it on the unlucky.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Lurch wrote:

‘As many sexual partners as they can get’: Dating apps fuelling rise in casual sex

There goes the news media getting cause and effect exactly backwards.

If the women out there weren’t, well, casual sex sluts, those apps would not exist. It’s the complete lack of accountability on women for irresponsible sexual behavior that fuels the rise in casual sex. Apps like tinder are merely servicing that burgeoning market.

[Anonymous 2]

I live about 100km from Brisbane,and I don’t use any dating apps,and after several months I even quit F~~~book. But if you want to f~~~ a woman it is very easy to find one here. Warning ! The majority of them are not single. So you are might end up in some trouble. I am really did slow down because almost any interaction with a women can be very dangerous here . I never had an STD ( lucky!! ) and I like to keep it that way ! It is not worth the risk! Heaps of free porn available on the Internet and I just got a new 37″ screen. Much safer and much cheaper on the long run.

[Author]

Posts