Czech Republic to Implement Right to Bear Arms in their Constitution

[Shadow1275Participant 1178]

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-01/2nd-amendment-comes-europe-czech-republic-enshrine-right-bear-arms-constitution

The lower Parliament recently voted to add the Right to Bear Arms into their Constitution. This is in direct defiance of the EU’s typical policy on the Matter.

President Milos Zeman: “Earlier I spoke often about limiting the ability to have large quantities of weapons. But after the terrorist attacks, I have changed the idea.”

It’s so obvious I can’t believe anyone buys into it. If the Law is supposed to prevent criminals from owning weapons, yet criminals DGAF about the law, then what is the point of even having it at all? Granted one on one someone might escape a conflict, but Criminals aren’t stupid. They come after you with guns, or in PACKS.

Best of luck to you Libtards, I’ll be carrying an Assault Rifle if they come my way

Have a great 4th Gents

He who is Brave is Free - Seneca

[Anonymous 0]

That’s a good plan for the Czech Republic. I wish that the Central American countries, like El Salvador, with a huge gang problem would follow suit. If the public is armed it would be hard for the gang thugs to extort money from them.

[Anonymous 6]

I wonder would they like an arms deal with America. Glock and Smith & Wesson would certainly love to do business. Or they go to Italy and get the Beretta. Gun Heaven!!!

[Anonymous 14]

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder would they like an arms deal with America. Glock and Smith & Wesson would certainly love to do business. Or they go to Italy and get the Beretta. Gun Heaven!!!

They already make some of the world’s best guns with the CZ, they don’t need any of our stuff. The P01 is one of the few guns to garner a NATO serial number, it had to go through some of the most insane testing to make this happen, great guns, I own one.

[AttonParticipant]

Guns distributed by tax paying legitimate businesses over criminals sounds like an improvement by far.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Anonymous 6]

Anonymous wrote:

Venom wrote:

I wonder would they like an arms deal with America. Glock and Smith & Wesson would certainly love to do business. Or they go to Italy and get the Beretta. Gun Heaven!!!

They already make some of the world’s best guns with the CZ, they don’t need any of our stuff. The P01 is one of the few guns to garner a NATO serial number, it had to go through some of the most insane testing to make this happen, great guns, I own one.

I didn’t know they made the CZ. Looks like they have everything handled, just needed an ok from the Constitution.

[Anonymous 14]

Anonymous wrote:

I didn’t know they made the CZ. Looks like they have everything handled, just needed an ok from the Constitution.

Yea, that country has been doing a lot of great things since becoming a Republic.

[Shadow1275Participant 1178]

Anonymous wrote:

Venom wrote:

I wonder would they like an arms deal with America. Glock and Smith & Wesson would certainly love to do business. Or they go to Italy and get the Beretta. Gun Heaven!!!

They already make some of the world’s best guns with the CZ, they don’t need any of our stuff. The P01 is one of the few guns to garner a NATO serial number, it had to go through some of the most insane testing to make this happen, great guns, I own one.

Been looking to get a CZ 75, right after I get my hands on a M1911

The Czechs make quality guns, no doubt about it

He who is Brave is Free - Seneca

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

They should require all citizens to arm and non-citizens as little access as possible.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Joey AlfioParticipant]

I think this comes in the wake of German pressure on the Czech Republic to start taking their share of migrants so they responded with this.

Δεν υπάρχει τίποτε αδύνατο γι’ αυτόν που θα προσπαθήσει. - Μέγας Αλέξανδρος

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Perhaps it just old age.. or perhaps I’m getting a little rusty from being out of uniform for so long. Please correct me if I’m wrong.. but. If you are refugee seeking asylum, then you normally land in the country that is closest to you, but away from life threatening events. This is asylum seeking. This is refugee status. You are an immigrant if you decide to relocate to another country and assimilate to the host society. In this way you are an immigrant. But if military aged men come in droves from another country, demanding resources and rights not secured through the other aforementioned methods, then that would be occupation at minimum, an invasion at worst.

Now, I’m not the brightest crayon in the box, but as I see it.. if you seek refugee or migrant status, I will arrive with ‘3 hots and a cot’. Maybe even some resources to get you back on your own two feet. But if you come in the other way, you can expect me to arrive on site violently, lay down maximum fire-power for effect, for 12-18 seconds, break contact, then spend the rest of the day hunting what remains.

If that was the approach to nonsense like those riots, not only would a lot of things change, but a lot of laws wouldn’t have to be passed and played with in the first place. But what do I know really?

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

Good! Arm the people.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[Shadow1275Participant 1178]

Binary Logic wrote:

Perhaps it just old age.. or perhaps I’m getting a little rusty from being out of uniform for so long. Please correct me if I’m wrong.. but. If you are refugee seeking asylum, then you normally land in the country that is closest to you, but away from life threatening events. This is asylum seeking. This is refugee status. You are an immigrant if you decide to relocate to another country and assimilate to the host society. In this way you are an immigrant. But if military aged men come in droves from another country, demanding resources and rights not secured through the other aforementioned methods, then that would be occupation at minimum, an invasion at worst.

Now, I’m not the brightest crayon in the box, but as I see it.. if you seek refugee or migrant status, I will arrive with ‘3 hots and a cot’. Maybe even some resources to get you back on your own two feet. But if you come in the other way, you can expect me to arrive on site violently, lay down maximum fire-power for effect, for 12-18 seconds, break contact, then spend the rest of the day hunting what remains.

If that was the approach to nonsense like those riots, not only would a lot of things change, but a lot of laws wouldn’t have to be passed and played with in the first place. But what do I know really?

Methinks you’re a bit brighter than you let on. It’s tyranny is what it is. In germany and London they are moving to confiscate Property to house migrants. They take the tax payer money of locals and subsidize Refugee Families which are about 6 per family, then de incentivize mating when it comes to the Native population.

Why? Bc Immigrants vote Left plain and simple. How many Illegals voted for Killary last year?

He who is Brave is Free - Seneca

[Anonymous 3]

One thing is being allowed to have a gun. Other thing is that they need to know how and when to use it, and have it when needed and lock it when not needed, and avoid accidents and anyone stupid idiot or child getting a hand on a gun. Not a simple topic. But I guess they know that already if they manufacture pistols.

Gun in a hand of a wise man is good, anything else is bad.

Meanwhile in my country is someone uses a legally allowed teargas-pistol (that shoots no bullet, cannot kill but very loud) against some asshole, the idiot mainstream media says the ‘poor victim has been shot down’. In the last few months an university teacher has been fired and swatted by anti-terror troops for having such a gun (again, not killing gun) at workplace with him.

That’s why I have pepper spray. Sprays less than 15 milliliters are allowed to carry on, good against rabid dogs on bike ride at countryside, and against criminals with knife. Probably not enough against a bear or wolf, but those are rare. Bigger sprays are only allowed for home use against burglars. Tear gas guns and rubber bullet guns are also only for home.

My opinion, that first they needed to make a second amendment for non-lethal weapons for the whole of Europe. No kills but order may get restored (except terrorist with guns).

And about a citizen owning lethal gun and being under attack? Let’s say he is at just an everyay situation, does he left gun at home in the safe? (Or, if attacked at hom by burglar, does he have time to unlock the safe and load the gun?) If terror attack: terrorist already has a gun in hand and maybe aiming at him or other people, while the innocent armed civilian needs a few seconds to take gun out of the holder, arm it, aim, and not shoot someone else standing near (while terrorist may be a lot more trained, he came from some Gunpowder-istan country) But anyway, it is a much faster counterattack than the 5-10 minutes it takes for police to arrive. Second question: How will the arriving policemen then quickly distinguish the civilian and the terrorist if both have handguns? (of course, men in black clothes with AK47 are terroists, that would be easy, but bigger guns maybe more accurate, so it may be better idea to hide than to shoot back with a pistol?)

Disclaimer: I didn’t ever touched any type of gun (except toys in childhood), opinon based on what I just read or heard in news.

[Anonymous 3]

Another thought: criminals and terrorists already may have guns, so why not arm innocent civilians?

[IRuleMeParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Another thought: criminals and terrorists already may have guns, so why not arm innocent civilians?

“Becuz gunz iz bad!!!” says the Democrats.

[TicParticipant 4329]

Anonymous wrote:

Disclaimer: I didn’t ever touched any type of gun (except toys in childhood), opinon based on what I just read or heard in news.

No surprise there.

What don’t you ask how hiding helped all those people in these terrorist attacks in theaters or night clubs, etc. The best protection against an armed man is another arm citizen who practices with that weapon to get proficient. In fact, he has the element of surprise as his gun is hidden, therefore, no one knows he has it until he has to use it.

There are a lot of videos on youtube where having a gun saved lives. Carrying a gun is a tremendous responsibility but an incredible lifesaver.

God bless peace and freedom.

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

For this thread, it’s important to keep in mind witness testimony from recent London terrorist attack:

Male Witness: “the 4 men charged into the pub, encircled a woman sitting on chair and began stabbing her simultaneously with butcher knives. She screamed ‘Help Me!!!!’ All the men had at pub was bar stools and bottles and so we threw them at the terrorists but had no effect and they continued stabbing her as she kept screaming ‘Help me!!!'”

[Shadow1275Participant 1178]

surfdude12 wrote:

For this thread, it’s important to keep in mind witness testimony from recent London terrorist attack:

Male Witness: “the 4 men charged into the pub, encircled a woman sitting on chair and began stabbing her simultaneously with butcher knives. She screamed ‘Help Me!!!!’ All the men had at pub was bar stools and bottles and so we threw them at the terrorists but had no effect and they continued stabbing her as she kept screaming ‘Help me!!!’”

Don’t forget, you can’t have guns but the Politicians’ Guards can

He who is Brave is Free - Seneca

[Anonymous 3]

Tic wrote:

There are a lot of videos on youtube where having a gun saved lives. Carrying a gun is a tremendous responsibility but an incredible lifesaver.

Yes, that is in one sentence what I wanted to say.

In such an attack, of course, hidden gun at the belt of a civilian can have surprise effect. But, anyway, even if I had a gun somewhere at me, first instinct would be to jump in any cover, for the seconds of grabbing the gun out of the holder and “swithching it on”. Without gun, I’d do the same, one cannot outrun a bullet. I trained a little krav maga for a year, where we had a training with toy guns too. If the gunman can be approached suddenly, there is far more chance to grab his hand and push the gun away from you and kick him the same time and take the gun. If you grab it at the top and rotate it away, it can be removed from his hand any strong he holds it. But if you are 2 meters or more away from a gunman, you are dead. With bigger longer guns, I’d improvise the “taking away baseball bat” scenario. We also trained to take away knives.Or grab the knife holding hand and kick the knife (by the handle) into the attackers body. Of course those were toys, but we got the concept. I recommend krav maga to anyone who wants to survive if s~~~ happens.

[Author]

Posts