Cyberporn study – typical useless BS

Topic by Hammerhead

Hammerhead

Home Forums MGTOW Central Cyberporn study – typical useless BS

This topic contains 6 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by MGTOW Knight  MGTOW Knight 2 years, 10 months ago.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #433409
    +1
    Hammerhead
    Hammerhead
    Participant
    362

    Here’s the media thumbnail version:
    http://nypost.com/2017/03/09/there-are-three-types-of-porn-watcher-and-only-one-is-healthy/?link=TD_heatst_articles.47942&utm_source=heatst_articles.47942&utm_campaign=circular&utm_medium=NYPOST

    Here’s the actual study link:
    http://www.jsm.jsexmed.org/article/S1743-6095%2816%2930842-6/fulltext#sec3.1

    Note first that the mainstream media (MSM) story inexplicably changes the label given to one of the three groups (i.e., labels) to “at-risk” from the study’s term “highly distressed non-compulsive.”

    Then, note how the participants were recruited: “A convenience sample of North American men and women at least 18 years old was recruited through university electronic lists, classified advertisement web sites, and social networks.” Also, “In the final sample, 71.8% were women (n = 596) and 28.2% were men (n = 234) 18 to 78 years old (mean = 25.20, SD = 8.00).” WTF? That’s about as unrepresentative and unreliable a group as you could assemble, outside of a COSMO magazine poll!

    Consider also that the results of this “research” was based upon SELF-REPORTING, a notoriously unreliable method of obtaining data. In this case, it’d be difficult to use objective and reliable methods, obviously.

    The MSM report:

    “Recreational viewers account for 75 percent of all participants in the study, watching an average of 24 minutes of porn a week.

    This group consisted of mainly women and people in relationships.”
    . . .
    “Then there is the compulsive group.

    This group may have made up just 11.8 percent of the participants, but watched a staggering 110 minutes of porn per week.

    Researchers discovered that men were more likely to fall into this category.”
    . . .
    “But while the majority who watch porn appear to be able to do so in a healthy manner, it can be a problem for some.”

    So, the MSM report boils it all down to (largely): How women/couples view porn is good and healthy, how men view porn is bad. It’s HORRIBLE when men watch nearly two hours a week of porn!!! SHOCKING conclusion, eh??? Bet you never saw that result coming! (Pardon the pun.) Those hours should be put to use benefiting some woman!

    This is why the social “sciences” are useless. I couldn’t even read through the whole study, I was so annoyed. You can get any conclusion you want from a social study, if you control the selection of participants and the other variables.

    #433429
    +2
    Awakened
    Awakened
    Participant
    35202

    Who CARES about a study on Porn except some eggheads at Universities who are getting LARGE grants to sit around wanking it all day (IE: Research), and then writing up B.S. Studies ??

    In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

    #433432
    +1
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    I find funny that the article, and especially the survey (there’s a survey saying that pornography is “morally wrong” and most people “strongly favor” restricting it), are clearly biased against porn, and still they find that

    “Recreational viewers account for 75 percent of all participants”

    While saying that recreational porn is healthy.

    So?
    75% porn users use it in a healthy way.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #433480
    +1
    Uchibenkei
    uchibenkei
    Participant
    7965

    This is just professors wanting to watch porn at work. They have to fabricate a problem to keep “researching”.

    I bathe in the tears of single moms.

    #433494

    Anonymous
    1

    This really make me laugh, who in the hell makes a minutes table of how healthy porn watching is?
    Hell, everyone can make studies if those are the standards.

    #433515
    +1
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    This really make me laugh, who in the hell makes a minutes table of how healthy porn watching is?
    Hell, everyone can make studies if those are the standards.

    It’s also funny that men who have premature ejaculation problems with such system actually result “healthier” than men who take more time to reach orgasm.
    I need an average of 30 minutes, most times I don’t use porn,but it would be enough using porn as stimulant three times in a week and I would got a total of 90 minutes.
    In comparison, a guy with premature ejaculation problems, lasting merely 2 minutes to reach orgasm, could use porn 40 times per week and being “healthier” than me, with a total of 80 minutes.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #433523
    MGTOW Knight
    MGTOW Knight
    Participant
    7477

    F~~~ this study! Jerking off is good for your prostate. LOL

    Fuck bitches... literally and metaphorically

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.