Cucked Canada Proposes A New Bill to Destroy Men

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

Usually the defense attorney does have to provide all evidence (e.g. witness list, etc) he KNOWS about at the beginning of trial, but if he learns of NEW evidence after trial starts (some new witness comes forward) he can still put them on, as long as you give prosecutor a chance to depose them quickly (without jury) before he is put on. So both prosecutor and defense attorney had to disclose everything THEY KNEW OF at beginning of trial, but this seems to SHUT OUT anything new, which is crazy. If defendant learns of EXCLUPATORY witness, how can that conviction stand up on appeal?????

[narwhalParticipant]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

You are under the idea that courts are places of logic. If they were we would be okay and be able to consistently expect just outcomes.

Which would mean that these changes are irrelevant anyway. I’d say there’s the same chance of logic winning the day under either scenario.

Ok. Then do it.

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

dude. Move the f~~~ outta there. Canada’s leaders won’t be satisfied until men are getting fitted for slave collars at birth.

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[ironheartParticipant 944]

Anonymous wrote:

Forgive my ignorance here but can’t there be a vote of no confidence in parliament? How unlikely would that be?

Unlikely as most votes in Parliament are party driven. Sometimes open voting is allowed, but the dissenters still get punished if they vote against the party.

Non-confidence requires that the ruling party (Liberals) be primarily a minority government, not the majority they currently are. There are enough feminazis in the opposition ranks that even with dissent in the Liberal side, the bill that favors women in a courtroom would pass.

I am Canadian, and hate the current system here.

"Women have become so full of hatred that they are blind to reason and humanity. That which they practice will be the end of humanity, long before any war that men may fight.." "Women are predators by nature. Why else do you think they are so quick to gang up and go after a man they hate for showing any sign of weakness?"

[ironheartParticipant 944]

Anonymous wrote:

This isn’t my problem. If you actually avoided women it wouldn’t be for you either.

Yeah, as if that works. Fem-Nazis are predators. I have seen them hunt men with false accusations as a hobby.

"Women have become so full of hatred that they are blind to reason and humanity. That which they practice will be the end of humanity, long before any war that men may fight.." "Women are predators by nature. Why else do you think they are so quick to gang up and go after a man they hate for showing any sign of weakness?"

[MonkParticipant 17047]

They are now so poisonous, and so dangerous, that TOTAL SEGREGATION is the only answer.

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

So, it’s basically time for Canadian men to move south of the border en masse??

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[Handsome VicParticipant 1613]

Hammerdown and all..

Bill C-52 makes these changes, but it gets worse from there.

In Ontario, the police are at the same time required to turn over their case investigations to Sexual Assault Centres for “outside review”:

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/ottawa/philadelphia-model-ontario-police-forces-review-1.4433473

This creates a 1-2 punch for men falsely accused of sexual assault, whereby the defence is forced to divulge its case up front to the accuser, and the accuser has the opportunity to have the case reviewed and be coached on where to have new evidence, additional “witness statements” etc. introduced.

It is a matter of time until these reviews are adopted in other provinces.

All in all making engaging with women extremely dangerous because a phony sexual assault charge increasingly shifts the burden to the defence, while becoming harder and harder to defeat.

Men, be warned.

I'm going my own way. Maybe I'll see you there.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

In my opinion, this is serious.
Even if one avoids women, some lady could get p~~~ed off for whatever reason and file false charges against you.
A friend of mine had to defend himself against false charges because he promoted a lady at work and there was some jealousy in the office.
Laws like this will cause more men to walk away. (I personally am running away.)

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22546]

Given that womens lies can frame and destroy a man, regardless of truth (ie regardless if you avoid them, they can lie), yes, it should matter to all men.

They can one phone call anyone, a stranger walking down the street. They can just say they feel scared. You do nothing.

Also anything that shifts the burden of proof from the accuser to the accused is not good law.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[SwimcatParticipant 3599]

This is what makes my blood run cold.

[Old RottweilerParticipant 1520]

Avoid women on every level. Their loss, but you have no choice. You can do everything right, and they decide they don’t want you to leave, so they cry rape or sexual assault. Now apparently they are even taken seriously after 20 years or more.

The only way to win is to not play.

[Author]

Posts