Could Condoms or other Chemicals make Sex toxic?

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

I going to be using this as a placeholder for this Hypothesis.

You see, I am not a full fledge chemist. But it seems that there are some real issues with the amount of chemicals we are ingesting or are exposed to that may have an explanation to what might be going on all around us.

MGTOW.com might now be the best place to talk about this, but if you want some truth & knowledge, this is one of the best place that I can think of to do so.

The reason why I bring this up has to be the dumbing down of our young men today. And it may be caused by women’s habits.

It is well known that people are just not the same as they use to be. Matter a fact, it would explain much of what is going on today that not only affects men, but our children.

See, right now, we have a basis on what is considered a toxin at least at the neurological level. There is a wide variety of said neurotoxins.

What if our actions of yesteryear was able to produce an effect that would in fact bring about the society that we have today?

For example, what if we were exposed to a kind of neurotoxin that then accumulated in the body then was transferred on to the children?

It’s common knowledge that at least in western civilization, there have been some pretty harsh effects due to chemicals we have been exposed to. It also would not be out of the realm of possibility that if you have certain sections of the population that are sensitive to certain things like American Indians and Alcohol, or how Asians have a high tolerance for starchy foods, therefore fat deposits are not easily accumulated. Maybe there is some kind of toxicity that can be spread thru sexual contact?

I don’t think there has been a study on this at least in the public realm that would go into this. But the hypothesis that it would change behavior would be a valid notion.

TFM for example talks about Fertility rates and so forth. And I wonder what segment of the population suffers most from this?

Sure we have real world verified explanations. But I wonder if there might be more underlying to this.

For one, women have been having and increase in sexual partners. And that coincides with Condom usage.

In the past, humans have not been exposed to synthetic chemicals that are present in such things like condoms or lubricants that are in these kinds of contraceptives.

Again, I’m just throwing this out here, but what if the mixing of these chemicals causes more emphasis to behavior traits such as ..Well, I know not technical term, but cause women to become more whorish. And maybe encourage men to become more feminine etc.

It would not be a stretch for a company to push their own market of products with a way to make that market demographic dependent on them or at least insight an addiction to that product by taking advantage of natural variables in the environment or a person’s choice to influence behavioral traits that would make a person want to use these products more often. In this case. Condoms.

Now it is well known that sperm by itself ends up in a woman’s brain tissue in the form of DNA markers of some kind. Don’t quote me on the process, but I think it plausible to assume that just like prohormones to play a part in this, I wonder what it does when combined with Neurological complexity that relates to human emotional interactions?

I have stated before that environmental factors affect choice for women more than just about any other. And what if women who have been exposed to such chemicals are then influenced by them producing these neurological side effects such as loss of empathy and typical female characteristics that women were once known for having in larger quantity than before.

It can’t all be down to just facts such as gynocentrism or Feminism. And Idea does not just spread through choice. It usually takes a catalyst.

It been said before that women today are almost all on some kind of “Pain” medication. This pain medication has been known to produce the same effects as “Love” experienced in the brain.

If one were to look at how drugs or the addiction to a substance affects the behavior of a human being, then it would be a breakthrough that would at least account for some of the nonsense that is plaguing our existence today as males.

For example, Mercury compounds have the ability to change the neural make up of a human brain. What if this could be done in a way that would go under the radar?

Its an interesting question to ask.

If anyone has any idea what I am talking about, maybe you can chime in. But I plan to develop this further. The implications of being able to explain or prove that Pair Bonding could be affected by the introduction to these chemicals would be subsational.

Basically, think about it this way. If I could admistier a chemical that could change a person’s behavior in a way that would discourage empathy, or feelings, then I could then in fact take advantage of those side effects making a larger impact on a section of society.

For example, women in the workforce. Women as far as I know have never wanted to start careers or become cubicle warriors. It also would explain why mothers no longer feel the strong instinctive need to raise their children successfully.

Today, we can point to Financial motives. But even then, that has to come at a hard price. Something needs to be manipulated besides cognitive thought.

The reason why this may be important is that we have cominitues here in the USA that do not foster on Hypergamy. Rather it is based on traditional males and female roles. They also do not mess around with things like Electricity, or modern chemicals. If this is true, then if we can isolate what is doing this, then there may be hope for at least identifying the problems so that Future men can avoid it.

I mean, maybe it’s just me, but it sure sounds like it’s hard to swallow that women just give up the ghost on everything they were programed to do. I mean it’s like telling a young straight boy not to like women and start jacking off to Gay porn.

We are now at a state in our evolutionary progress that there may be a hard limit set that discourages population or progress. If that were the case, then it’s only reasonable to assess that there is something going on that not only changes our fundamental behaviors. But may explain why our lives at least for now are changing all over despite the Traditional models that were put in place to naturally put into check our different behavior patterns.

Now I know this is getting a bit SciFi here. But what if something went wrong. For example increasing cognitive ability of women then produced a negative impact? Or further stunting that would also produce the same effect. A kind of Eugenics program that went off the rails?

The reason why this may be possible is that governments have always suited to control large populations.

If this is true, then it would almost seem like a valid wartime initiative. Or it could just be a great story to right about.

Either way, it does not seem correct to think that all the turmoil we experience today is so blanketed uniformly in some populations and not others.

It seems that we have a Mystery on our hands.

I will talk further about this as time comes as maybe I can dig up some clues or try to seek some evidence about it.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Some quick references:

https://blog.paleohacks.com/chemicals-condoms/

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[hmskl’dParticipant 6409]

I often use ‘rubber gloves’ in my work. I buy them in bulk manufactured in various materials .. nitrile, vinyl and latex. I have noticed slight differences in my skin reacting to the various types when worn for longer periods. However, the most noticeable reaction I find is when the gloves are powdered internally for ease of inserting the hand. I react to this powder and therefore take steps to always purchase unpowdered gloves.
What I am getting at is that it is also possible that the various materials, oils and substances used to line and/or lubricate such devices as exam gloves .. and for that matter, latex condoms .. needs to be looked at, as well as the devices themselves .. as has been mentioned. Could these lubricants also be reacting with the basic glove materials? .. as, for example, I have noticed a latex style glove quickly disintegrates and falls to pieces when exposed to such chemicals as when applying liquid car wax .. when in contact with the glove for any period of time. Interesting thread. I can see that a condom lubricant could soften and expose ingredients just as I witness my gloves softening and sometimes disintegrating when in use and exposed to various solvents, oils and chemicals. Lubricants are not inert substances .. so one must ask, how long has that lubricated condom been on the store shelf? What is the condition of the latex after being packaged along with oils for a year or even more? I have reacted in the past to hand lotions that I sometimes apply before putting on rubber gloves .. so the latex certainly must certainly be reacting, to to some degree, to the chemicals that make up the lubricants that it is in contact with in a sealed package .. long term.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

iMickey503 wrote:

It is well known that people are just not the same as they use to be. Matter a fact, it would explain much of what is going on today that not only affects men, but our children.

See, right now, we have a basis on what is considered a toxin at least at the neurological level. There is a wide variety of said neurotoxins.

My problem with this is that dangerous chemicals being hazardous to people’s health has been common ever since the advent of the factories where people worked long s~~~s, around various smoke and other things. If problems emerge them that then it would not just be because we started using plastic bottles but as a result of hundreds of years of factories and using coal and gas.

iMickey503 wrote:

Again, I’m just throwing this out here, but what if the mixing of these chemicals causes more emphasis to behavior traits such as ..Well, I know not technical term, but cause women to become more whorish. And maybe encourage men to become more feminine etc.

The problem with this is that it sounds kind of like a Traditionalists agenda (complaining that the men are too weak to defend society and women like they are supposed to).

Now finally is this Liz Lang bitch a Scientist in any regard? what credentials does she have? any peer reviewed papers or citations?

But after dealing with her can you explain a testable hypothesis which can be demonstrated via evidence, tests, facts and a mechanism for how you are suggesting it works? if able to you would put this up for peer review where it will be tested over and over in an attempt to disprove your arguments?

And finally (again) if proven wrong would the evidence convince you of it being wrong? no crying conspiracy. no bitching nothing like that but admitting you were wrong in your findings?

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

I wish I could comment on that brother, but I got some real facts to dig up, and some research/ white papers to go through. I’m not one for making quick jumps or conspiracy theories regarding scientific knowledge.

What I do know is that for men, the hazardous substances that we come in contact or ingest have little research done for our benefit. Keeping to true MGTOW style, I’m not one for making up stories that teach a narrative that is only beneficial to one party or sex since we all have skin in the game. literally.

You may have heard the phrase that there are no old Metal workers or welders. Same with Painters.

Men’s roles in a hazardous profession and or environment is pretty clean cut.

For example with lead poisoning. It had some of the same side effects as Organic compounds of mercury that actually went through the latex gloves and was absorbed via the skin.

Science is still out on the subject of interactions with chemicals that men and women expose themselves to. But its no secret that you can take 2 benign molecules, and create something pretty nasty through interactions with time, heat and or a catalyst.

And the powder that is used on gloves is a good question. THey USE to use Lycopodium Powder in gloves:

Today, they use Cornstarch. Oddly, mixing both these things together can make a pretty good explosion. The first Internal combustion engines used this. makes you wonder if they could use this witches brew for Early F1 racing cars?

I know this is going way off into wonderland, but things like cornstarch are actually pretty reactive to things like oils. And your skin is full of organic compounds when sweating.

Sweat by itself is no big deal. But..

If you look up the chemical makeup of something like basic perspiration, then couple that with a either powder from latex gloves or nitrile, then add heat or in this case, the lack of oxygen to break down the reaction, then there is a good chance that by adding other chemicals to the mix that will eventually break down something like a latex in itself a polymer that has sulfur and other things in it..

You see where I am getting at here?

The reason why I bring up condoms specifically, is that their very use is in an area that the skin tissue where they are placed are highly susceptible to absorption by or through the human endocrine system.

Of the two systems that these chemicals come in contact with, there has to be an interaction with these chemicals that we just don’t have further research on.

I think Carnage would be better able to explain the below, but the interactions between these systems and cells in the body may have a side effect to the human body that may be different from men to women. Again, I am out of my league here. But I do know that there is a significant interactions with cell communications and their interruptions that can signal behavioral changes with respect to their actions when exposed to various chemical compounds.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracrine_signalling

Again, the scope of this on the body is no small matter. Actually, many of the ailments that are tied to interruptions with that system seem to be more present with men in the western world then other populations that are outside of western chemical contact or influence. This also goes into the effects of radio magnetic interference.

Here is a small list of disorders that affect that system:
All Endocrine DisordersAcromegalyAddison’s DiseaseAdrenal CancerAdrenal DisordersAnaplastic Thyroid CancerCushing’s SyndromeDe Quervain’s ThyroiditisDiabetesFollicular Thyroid CancerGestational DiabetesGoitersGraves’ DiseaseGrowth DisordersGrowth Hormone DeficiencyHashimoto’s ThyroiditisHurthle Cell Thyroid CancerHyperglycemiaHyperparathyroidismHyperthyroidismHypoglycemiaHypoparathyroidismHypothyroidismLow TestosteroneMedullary Thyroid CancerMEN 1MEN 2AMEN 2BMenopauseMetabolic SyndromeObesityOsteoporosisPapillary Thyroid CancerParathyroid DiseasesPheochromocytomaPituitary DisordersPituitary TumorsPolycystic Ovary SyndromePrediabetesReproductionSilent ThyroiditisThyroid CancerThyroid DiseasesThyroid NodulesThyroiditisTurner SyndromeType 1 DiabetesType 2 Diabetes

The one that should reach everyone’s attention is hypogonadism.

Knowing that Low T levels can cause the following systems:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
* Fatigue
* Decreased sex drive
* Difficulty concentrating
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Its not that hard to come to a connection to why there are so many men today that are not only having issues with themselves, but might just explain some of the lower performing men today and their I.Q. Also the lower personal performance in a competitive work environment or legal distavages in a court system that is based on large data sets to get a required result and high concentration needed to see patterns of behavior.

The results speak for themselves, but to get further evidence that these chemicals can cause some damage speak for themselves from the The National Center for Biotechnology Information

The reason why I mention the above has to deal with the way it is harmful to men vs women.

Men sadly are have this real weakness when it comes to distributions at the neurological level. Men unlike women are wired in a way that their systems require a catalyst. This comes in the form of environmental feedback at the mental level that includes interactions with people. It takes neurological feedback in order to produce issues caused by chemical interactions of the neurons in the brain from toxins, or changes in the endocrine system that will then branch of to other systems of the male body.

This side effect might be the cause of environmental factors to the community that we live in changing its very shape.

Men and women interact differently to these chemicals, but overall, we experience the same factors on our nervous system. However, due to our male attributes, our behavior is modified in a different way then womens behavior.

Take for example what the response to stress would be from a woman. If there are factors that are imposing an artificial or chemical stress on her biological systems, the result may be the reationality for women in this case to become highly hypergamous.

This could be caused if her body or system is being told that their is a problem with the male she is with, or the satisfaction with her sex partner. It may make her seek out other partners due to have a fight or flight reflex to her senses that makes a woman seek out other partners, while abandoning the one she is with.

Males on the other had are built to be sacrificial, and in that case, a male will then experience great stress on himself, further encouraging the behavior patterns that are non productive to human survival.

This would lead to almost all the symptoms pointed out in NCBI definitions and findings.

Basicly, a mental illness will result and if carefully crafted will be enforced by social interactions tailored to produce such a result. AKA, feminism.

Ill go more into this later. Thanks for your input. I will look more into gloves soon as I get some more data on results.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

anonymousyam wrote:

iMickey503 wrote:

It is well known that people are just not the same as they use to be. Matter a fact, it would explain much of what is going on today that not only affects men, but our children.

See, right now, we have a basis on what is considered a toxin at least at the neurological level. There is a wide variety of said neurotoxins.

My problem with this is that dangerous chemicals being hazardous to people’s health has been common ever since the advent of the factories where people worked long s~~~s, around various smoke and other things. If problems emerge them that then it would not just be because we started using plastic bottles but as a result of hundreds of years of factories and using coal and gas.

iMickey503 wrote:

Again, I’m just throwing this out here, but what if the mixing of these chemicals causes more emphasis to behavior traits such as ..Well, I know not technical term, but cause women to become more whorish. And maybe encourage men to become more feminine etc.

The problem with this is that it sounds kind of like a Traditionalists agenda (complaining that the men are too weak to defend society and women like they are supposed to).

Now finally is this Liz Lang bitch a Scientist in any regard? what credentials does she have? any peer reviewed papers or citations?

But after dealing with her can you explain a testable hypothesis which can be demonstrated via evidence, tests, facts and a mechanism for how you are suggesting it works? if able to you would put this up for peer review where it will be tested over and over in an attempt to disprove your arguments?

And finally (again) if proven wrong would the evidence convince you of it being wrong? no crying conspiracy. no bitching nothing like that but admitting you were wrong in your findings?

My only agenda is the truth. However bad it hurts, its the truth. Truth is hard to swallow, but has lasting long term positive effects.

For the other items you mentioned, I’m going to break it down so it’s easier for me to reply clearly. BTW, DAMN GOOD FEEDBACK.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

First Question was as I understand:

Men have been exposed to a larger amount of toxins in their environment for over
two centuries. Why would there be a correlation now?

—–If I got it correct? the question you are asking is that the exposure has been happening for a long time. What is the significance of these toxins in present day and how is their impact related to the changes we are experiencing in men and women today vs the past?

If that is true, then the reason why I point this out is that the chemicals were previously limited to inhalation and physical contact with the skin that was not a mucous membrane minus the nostrils.

It is well known that mucosa has less tolerance then the skin that is the epidermis layer that normally was in direct contact and constant exposure to chemicals in the environment.

One thing to note is that skin by itself has no problem dealing with inorganic compunds. For example:

Human skin has a low permeability; that is, most foreign substances are unable to penetrate and diffuse through the skin. Skin’s outermost layer, the stratum corneum, is an effective barrier to most inorganic nanosized particles
SOURCE:
Baroli, Biancamaria (2010). “Penetration of nanoparticles and nanomaterials in the skin: Fiction or reality?”. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 99 (1): 21–50. doi:10.1002/jps.21817. ISSN 0022-3549.

They are at several places contiguous with skin: at the nostrils, the lips of the mouth, the eyelids, the ears, the genital area, and the anus.[1] Along with providing a physical barrier, they also contain key parts of the immune system and serve as the interface between the body proper and the microbiome.[2]:437

Some examples include:

Bronchial mucosa and the lining of vocal folds
Endometrium: the mucosa of the uterus
Esophageal mucosa
Gastric mucosa
Intestinal mucosa
Nasal mucosa
Olfactory mucosa
Oral mucosa
Penile mucosa
Vaginal mucosa
Frenulum of tongue
Tongue
Anal canal
Palpebral conjunctiva

Looking at the highlighted above, traditionally, these membreans never gained a high amount of direct contact with chemicals and compounds or molecules (forgive me if I am using the wrong nomenclature) of the organic nature that were engineered. Again Latex by itself does not really exist without adding other polymers and agents to it. It is well known that latex does break down. What they don’t tell you is that latex has a reaction to mucosa, as well as its final component when it breaks down at the chemical level.

This is what caught my attention. In order to increase the yield of rubber latex rubber production, these chemicals come into play.

OUt of those, it has been tested (Can’t find the info or link to that one) that these condoms also contain as much as 3-4 different fungus.

(G. lucidum, S. commune, G. sepiariumand G. striantum ).
SOURCES:
EN 113. Wood preservatives – test method for determining the protective effectiveness against wood destroying basidiomycetes – Determination of the toxic values. European Committee for Standardization, Brüssel, Belgium, 1996. 35 p.

Now from the history of latex, a rubber should not be able to kill you, but then again, peanuts and nut allergies do this all the time. And latex does have its history of doing so.

But it’s the method that it does this that is interesting. \

Since we are talking about the reactivity of chemicals and how it may be larger than being exposed to such things common to inhalation or dermal contact with industrial environments that men and women have been working in for a long time, this reactivity is the key here

Nasal ingestion is specifically tailored to reject more chemicals as the composition of the nasal mucosa is different than that of the Vagial or penile membreane or mucosa. But it is Highly susceptible to absorption just like any other mucosa

It is well known that their are already a myriad of defenses from Bacteria, and virus.

Problem is, that we are no longer dealing with those two. We are dealing with Direct chemical incubation in direct and prolonged contact. Sex can last as long as 10 minutes to a few hours.

The issue here is that WOMEN get far more time in contact with these substances, and therefore can in theory pass chemical side effects to their children. Men on the other hand will suffer from this as well through oral sex with the female and kissing. And as we all know, oral sex does have a direct connection with throat cancer for men.

——New England Journal of Medicine shouldn’t be read as, “Eat yourself some pussy, get yourself some throat cancer!”

The effects of these chemicals, fungal infections, toxins, etc must have some kind of effect on our well being emotionally. (again, I know the data set is correct, but not the impact or its actual legitimacy as of now and how it affects men and women.) However, the correlation to physical and neurological or emotional precursors seem to be very well documented in the medical as well as pure scientific research data from the industrial industry to these chemicals and their reactions with human and non human workers and species such as rats, mice, monkeys etc, etc.

That is why symptoms such as depression can kill you just by doing nothing but wanting to die or the feeling that leads to it. It is common in industrial environments to be wary of those that experience mania, or hopelessness on the job site as this can lead to workplace hazards for other people on a work site.

And it’s no secret in the construction trades.

As most of you men know, construction workers rarely stick with the same partner for long, and exposure or use of condoms is mandatory since most of them are having random secual parters. Ask yourself. How many ocu[ations have thier own help line?

This was very well documented in Canada where old tenants were kicked out of their apartments and a man (Ron Lickers?) that had no previous medical issues simply had his heart stop.

Looking at this image below, there seems to be some validity to its contnet for this question:

Well at least Asutalia is doing something about it, and on their website, they are actully talking about this being one of the reasons this may be a connection.

(I will try to answer question 2 in next post. )

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

anonymousyam wrote:

iMickey503 wrote:
Again, I’m just throwing this out here, but what if the mixing of these chemicals causes more emphasis to behavior traits such as ..Well, I know not technical term, but cause women to become more whorish. And maybe encourage men to become more feminine etc.

The problem with this is that it sounds kind of like a Traditionalists agenda (complaining that the men are too weak to defend society and women like they are supposed to).

Now finally is this Liz Lang bitch a Scientist in any regard? what credentials does she have? any peer reviewed papers or citations?

But after dealing with her can you explain a testable hypothesis which can be demonstrated via evidence, tests, facts and a mechanism for how you are suggesting it works? if able to you would put this up for peer review where it will be tested over and over in an attempt to disprove your arguments?

And finally (again) if proven wrong would the evidence convince you of it being wrong? no crying conspiracy. no bitching nothing like that but admitting you were wrong in your findings?

Okay… One at a time…

The problem with this is that it sounds kind of like a Traditionalists agenda (complaining that the men are too weak to defend society and women like they are supposed to).

Well if you don’t defend society I.E. your culture, YOU get THIS:

As far as traditional agenda, the hidden Red Pill of that is that WE MEN had power in that system. What they are pushing now has NOTHING to do with tradcon way of life.
—-But that’s not the point of my argument above about the influence of toxins through sexual contact and the items used today vs that of yesteryear.
And if hypothesis above stops one man from killing himself in the workplace, getting cancer, low T or the saving of European civilization, then that is what I am interested in. Women, Marriage, that’s not my issue.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

But after dealing with her can you explain a testable hypothesis which can be demonstrated via evidence, tests, facts and a mechanism for how you are suggesting it works? if able to you would put this up for peer review where it will be tested over and over in an attempt to disprove your arguments?

I don’t cite sources on random boss. Liz made a good article that she took time to cite her sources to a credible source. I.E.

Under them, this guy is doing the chemical research.

Tel:+44 (0)20 3637 5794 click to email
Andrew has a background in chemistry, magazine publishing and chemical hazard regulations. From 2010 to 2014, he was the deputy editor at Chemistry World, the flagship magazine of the Royal Society of Chemistry. Since then, he has worked as a consultant on a range of projects relating to science communication, EU policy and REACH.

I think they might be legit but not sure. Peer review it for me.

From their websiteOur mission is to advance excellence in the chemical sciences and this has been the case since 1841 when 77 scientists – including doctors, academics, manufacturers and entrepreneurs – formed the Chemical Society of London, with dialysis inventor Thomas Graham as their first President.Seven years later Queen Victoria granted a Royal Charter to the Society, confirming its purpose of “the general advancement of Chemical Science”.After 175 years our mission is just as relevant and valid; our work today still fulfils the roles undertaken by all four long-established bodies. But we pursue that mission on a scale the first 77 members would find inconceivable. We now have over 54,000 members across the world, an internationally-renowned not-for-profit publishing and knowledge business, and a reputation as an influential champion for the chemical sciences.

I think they are qualified… But not sure..Maybe you can peer review this.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

And finally (again) if proven wrong would the evidence convince you of it being wrong? no crying conspiracy. no bitching nothing like that but admitting you were wrong in your findings?[/quote]

……..Yea sure. But I don’t know how I can. I’m not a chemist. Nor do I specialize in these fields. I am an I.T. guy. I do Data Forensics. I don’t think I am qualified to say yes or no. Just look at the data and come to a hypothesis that would urge men to stay away from condoms and sex or contact with women or their children that may pass down these undesirable traits that we are witnessing in todays scocity.

I found a link to populations that don’t have exposure to things like condoms, Birth control or Industrial chemicals on par with the rest of the population.

Ahem:
The National Human Exposure Assessment Survey
NHEXAS was established in 1993, as a follow on to NHATS, to evaluate comprehensive human exposure to multiple chemicals on a community and regional scale (EPA 2005). NHEXAS expanded on NHATS by moni-

Page 31
Suggested Citation:”2 U.S. and International Biomonitoring Efforts.” National Research Council. 2006. Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Chemicals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11700. ×

Add a note to your bookmark
toring chemicals (including lead, other metals, pesticides, and organic chemicals) in blood and urine and by surveying personal exposures to chemicals through environmental sampling of air, water, and soil and dust and personal monitoring of air, food and beverages, and uptake (EPA 2005; NRC 1991). Three pilot surveys were conducted: in Arizona, in Maryland, and in a sample population of people in Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin (EPA 2005). NHEXAS measured 46 chemicals in about 460 people (NRC 1991). An EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) report reviewing NHEXAS noted that among the major strengths of its design were that it was possible to “track many of the exposure pathways back to sources of exposure and [that it] provides a sound scientific basis for exposure and risk reduction” (EPA SAB 1999). The SAB report also recommended that NHEXAS be linked with NHANES data.

Other current federal efforts that incorporate biomonitoring include the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)-U.S. EPA Centers for Children’s Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research, the NIEHS Superfund Basic Research Program, and CDC’s NHANES and the Reports on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. NHANES remains the largest and most comprehensive effort to study chemicals in the U.S. population. If funded, future national biomonitoring efforts would include the NCS, a longitudinal study of children from when they are in utero to the age of 21 years that would incorporate regular biomonitoring for environmental chemicals. CDC’s NHANES and the Reports on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, the NIEHS-EPA Centers for Children’s Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research, and the NCS are highlighted below. Details on other federal programs, including NIEHS’s Superfund Basic Research Program, are presented in Table 2-1.

According to the study, these are just a set of the chemicals that were measured by at least 12 different organizations

Chemicals Measured

Mercury, lead, cotinine, pesticides, phthalates, PAHs, PAH-DNA adducts, allergens, endotoxin, antioxidant micronutrients, cytokines, immunoglobulin E, cholinesterase, thyroid hormones, DNA polymorphisms

Lead, cadmium, mercury, cobalt, uranium, antimony, barium, beryllium, cesium, molybdenum, platinum, thallium, tungsten, organochlorine pesticides, organophosphorus insecticides (dialkyl phosphate metabolites), (specific metabolites), pyrethroid pesticides, other pesticides (2-isopropoyxyphenol, carbofuranphenol), herbicides, phthalates, phytoestrogens, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, polychlorinated biphenyls, tobacco smoke

Reference 1:

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4b05/938d07a22822707471c18ed241b00e2e7861.pdf

G. Yang1, D. Kechkeche2, H. Belhadj-Tahar3, N. Sadeg3
1School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China 2

Department of Chemistry, University of Pierre et Marie-Curie, Paris, France 3
AFPreMed, Toxicology Research Group, Toulouse, France
Email: nouredine.sadeg@ch-pontoise.fr

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

The Flesh light and the Dildos are not safe either? It makes me wonder what chemicals they are using in order to make the sex dolls of today. Again, the rage of plastics being bad for you may affect women more than men.

https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/assets/docs/j_q/phthalates_the_everywhere_chemical_handout_508.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phthalate

Notes: why you should care:

Weight gain largely stimulated estrogen growth.

Actual damage to testes. (YOUR NUTS)

Hormonal changes that have been shown to affect brain function.

One odd thing to note is that (I can’t find papers on this) is that it seems that lack of this chemical actually leads to some withdrawal symptoms.

Large rubbery dildos seem to be gushing with the stuff. It seems that it may be one of the reasons why men experience difficulty with erections if a partner uses a vibrator, or dildo often. The chemical actually looks like it breaks down in the vagina due to the Ph of the environment and the anaerobic (Or lack of oxygen) and then tends to stay there for some time after absorption into the mucous membrane tissue.

I am going to try to find out how to use this software.
http://www.sciencebysimulation.com/chemreax/Analyzer.aspx

Its a chemical reaction simulator.

CHEM-X

Oddly enough, this is available for android.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.evobooks.ReactionsLaboratory&hl=ru

I got my work cut out for me. GOD the VOICE.. When are they going to make a plugin to take care of that…:-)

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[Author]

Posts