I am going to try an explain how this relates to the red pill effect. Why things are the way we or I see them. I will try to explain it as my father would have and did but I am not close to being as good at relaying this information as he was. Yes, I know some will say I’m arrogant. But understand that it is only arrogance if you fail.
OK, imagine a village (society) of 100. 50 men and 50 women. This village would contain those that produce and those that consume.
The men would be expected to produce. Some men would be needed in consumer roles like military, police, firemen, teacher, etc. Their value would be to protect, serve, educate etc. But, the majority would be required to be productive members of the village. This is not good or bad, right or wrong. It is what the village requires to prosper.
The women would be expected to consume. Some women might produce temporarily but if she reverted to consume the village would accept her, etc. The majority would be required to be consumers that nurture etc. They are not less or more valuable etc.
Why is this this way? Because, nature works this way. It is rational. Look around. Outliers will exist one way or the other. Rabbit holes are everywhere. I am speaking broadly as it would appear at a thousand feet.
Now, all scenarios work off of this system. I know it is simplistic. It is just my playing field.
For instance, a single mother says she did a great job raising her children and she is mother of the year! No, no she is not! Not even close. Why? Because, it is impossible to be a producer and a consumer at the same time. Trust me, I might not know much, but I do know that someone else was taking care of your child or children while you were producing to survive.
Why do our societal laws favor women? Because, their role is to consume. A consumer cannot survive without a producer.
Welfare etc all work off of this as well, etc.
This is why Ayn Rand’s philosophy holds water.
The breakdown is the application by the village of a thing called FORCE!
A village cannot force a consumer. 0 GIVEN to 0 = 0, end of math class, go to the back of the room. So, the village must force a producer to give to a consumer. (It is only right, they say)
The forceful destruction of a producer in order to give to a consumer is, duh…..(poke pencil into eyeball repeatedly)
Feminists: they are consumers who want things to be fair and equal. They want 0 to equal 1. The village has and holds an inherent value to being a producer and that value is 1. Followed closely by, “Girls rule, you go consumer girl. Your the best, etc.”
So on and so on, the end.
I would like to take a moment and thank Keymaster. This is the only forum where I can exist. Many call me a male chavenist pig. I am, but I am also a producer.
There is no place in our society for a male producer. We must be destroyed. Turn on any social media, TV, etc.
In conclusion:
I told my father, “So, what your saying is it will not end well for me? How will I survive when I get old?”
My father replied, “Don’t worry about getting old, it won’t last long…”
Thanks Dad
