Consensual sex or violent rape?

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Reclaimer wrote:

Atton wrote:

Criminal courts decide this, thus it is why they where invented and goverment funded.

True.

But what’s your opinion?

My opinion is that you’re a feminist troll.

The sex started out as consensual. But then quickly he started to get rough. I said “ow” and he kept going. I told him to stop, please, and he held me down, bit me and hit me.

That’s rape.

It’s just her version, we should also hear his version, but what is described by her version is rape.

However, just only a feminist would propose to judge a case just only using the woman’s words.
That’s why I reported you.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Sky-OParticipant 18942]

Once she looks at a jury and says it was rape:

It’s rape

Bye, bye Chad. . .

[narwhalParticipant]

Based on what the article says, and if I was in the jury, I would have strongly leaned towards rape. It still is not enough information though, and would definitely need to hear the other side.

I don’t believe that a consent to sex is also a consent to bit and hit to the point that you cause bruising. I would see that as a separate consent. I’ve certainly been asked to do stuff like that before, but never assumed. To be perfectly honest, I don’t want to do any of that crap.

I see this as a case where so many false rape cases has made it more difficult for the definite cases or ones like these where a lot more investigation is needed. I would like guys like this where multiple women are pointing out the same man, and the events are recent to be looked in to. Where there is no large sum of money to be bagged.

That said, I do find something a little peculiar…

When someone robs you, you call her a thief.

When someone cheats on you, you call her a cheater.

When someone rapes you, you call him my rapist?

WTF? He’s your’s? It’s a term of possession? Like your Dad, your boyfriend. It’s strange in that other things that people typically don’t want, they don’t claim possession of it. You claim possession typically when you want to hold on to it. It’s just a thing, it’s not my thing. Just one of many that I don’t want to deal with. Yet the rapist isn’t just a rapist, it’s her rapist. To me, it clearly indicates that she doesn’t want to let go of victimhood, and the idea that she is strongly desired…things that her rapist provides.

And I surely could be reading in to much, but really…weird.

Ok. Then do it.

[OgreParticipant 5863]

More conclusive proof that progressive, socialist/marxism, feminism is a train station in Cuckooland.

She figured that he was another simp that would get her her precious O first and often.

I’m sorry that she suffered hitting and biting, but she consented to sex with an almost stranger without knowing what sex meant to him.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[trader1913Participant 1577]

Eric Lauder wrote:

That’s rape.

It’s just her version, we should also hear his version, but what is described by her version is rape.

However, just only a feminist would propose to judge a case just only using the woman’s words.
That’s why I reported you.

I agree with this, there are lots of women that like to get abused during sex, but because these women are usually bats~~~ insane they can completely ignore that she asked you to be rough and cry rape.

5 or 6 years ago there was a case in my country where a man went to court for a similar thing to this, but he had an audio recording which proved that the woman asked to be hit and held down which he did.

There are women in the porn industry that claim they were raped on camera, yet they signed contracts specifically allowing what was done on camera and they did not use the safeword.

If what she said can be proved then its rape, but thats what due process and the courts are for.

[KevinStylesParticipant 2580]

It’s more assault to me than rape if the sex was Consensual .

[OldBillParticipant]

trader1913 wrote:

There are women in the porn industry that claim they were raped on camera, yet they signed contracts specifically allowing what was done on camera and they did not use the safeword.

At least one porn producer/”star” still went to jail despite those signed contracts and despite his “studio” specializing in that sort of rough “sex”.

The women knew what kind of porn he made, they knew how he performed on camera, they signed contracts knowing what they knew, and he still went to prison. The Pussy Pass trumps all.

As for the story linked by the OP, we don’t have all the information. Going by what the press reported – and we all know that the press routinely lies by omission and commission – in my opinion what occurred was rape.

That being said, both parties were also criminally stupid; the woman for jumping into bed with someone she barely knew and the man for assuming that any slattern off the street would be into the same weird s~~~ he was.

Lesson for us here, brothers, is very clear. Women already are f~~~ed up enough to make vanilla, Mom & Dad, missionary position, sex a dire threat to your reputation, your psyche, your health, your finances, your liberty, and indeed, your very life.

If you’re into anything “beyond” “Leave it to Beaver” sex, you’re freely handing women more ammo with which to hurt you. What’s more, the further “out there” your particular tastes are, the more ammo you freely handing them.

The desire to get laid is understandable. It’s a one primal need woven into our very DNA. Primal or not, that doesn’t absolve you – a rational man going his own way – from the responsibility of approaching sex on your own terms.

By all means, have sex. Never discount the risks, however, and never willingly compromise your ability to go your own way.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

It would be interesting to be on the jury. I was just on a jury a couple of months ago where two guys got in a fight. The “victim” couldn’t keep his story straight and it didn’t take much for the jury to have reasonable doubt as to whether he was telling the truth or not. I would be curious to see if the bar for reasonable doubt would be as high when it was a woman that is the “victim”. Something tells me that the sympathy for cupcake would lower that bar substantially.

The guy is at minimum guilty of being an idiot. Why would you ever consent to sex with a stranger where she asks you to beat the s~~~ out of her while banging her? Maybe she’s in to that. Maybe she needs to look like she was raped because she’s already pregnant with Chad’s baby and needs a alibi for her husband. Maybe she’s just an evil man hater that wants to put men in jail. Way too many maybes to ever consent to that.

Order the good wine

[OldBillParticipant]

TaxGuy wrote:

It would be interesting to be on the jury.

If anyone here has never served on a jury, I’d recommend doing so if only to see how the “justice” system actually works. I’m not sure about the rest of the West, but in the Anglosphere you can’t volunteer to serve on a jury. While you cannot volunteer, you can also not “resist” being called for jury duty either.

Where I live, jury trials occur at the county level. You’re called into a jury pool for a given period, usually a month, and must appear each Monday for any possible selection for a trial. I was called into the pool a few years back but never served on a trial because I’m a middle aged white man.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[OgreParticipant 5863]

I’ve never received a summons.

White male, military cop. Even if I show I’ll be the first eliminated, the defense and prosecution will be fighting over who gets rid of me.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[Author]

Posts