Consensual Rape……The newest SJW buzzword.

Topic by Genesis

Genesis

Home Forums MGTOW Central Consensual Rape……The newest SJW buzzword.

This topic contains 22 replies, has 16 voices, and was last updated by ForeverDone  ForeverDone 2 years, 4 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #611762
    +5
    Genesis
    Genesis
    Participant
    420

    With all the different subgroups of rape-culture hysteria its hard to keep up with what DOESN’T constitute as rape.

    To summarize, a woman on her own accord keeps making visits to his house. He gets thirsty, she finally asks HIM “do you really want to do this?” he responds “yeah”, she retorts “OK”….and he proclaims that such constitutes as “consensual rape”. Naturally he gets a ton of likes/shares on social media by the same gullible social justice idiots and feminists alike who according to “reasoning” should be crucifying him for “committing a crime” (well 2 crimes, because apparently it’s “emotional rape” too) but naturally the bag of condemnations are rationed for the males that don’t agree. Apparently a woman can’t be held responsible for HER verbal admission to sex, and according to this embryonic moron, men should hold accountability for it.
    The simp that shared this (who for some reason I always envision cutting his 3.5 mm headphone jack sized scrotum with a formidable blade) was awarded a tongue lashing from me. I concluded to him with “…so much for the caricature of a strong independent responsible bold woman you and ACTUAL FEMALES strive to personify. Don’t put your libtard s~~~ again on me feed until you get up and find your Y chromosome” The last s~~~ I remember him triumphing at was a documentary of two female pastors getting married. What a f~~~ing c~~~ cuck-hole. Anyway, I can imagine that the SJW fringe mentality has found something new to victim blame about….its pretty sad that they had to officiate the buzzword from a dubstep instrumental created in 2011.

    #611766
    +12

    Anonymous
    3

    Why are you wasting your time looking for this stuff and arguing with people? You’re not going to change their minds. They’re not going to be affected by your words. It’s a total waste of time.

    #611783
    +8
    Xanthine
    xanthine
    Participant
    4903

    Honestly, they might as well just make sex illegal.

    #611797
    +6
    Secret Agent MGTOW
    Secret Agent MGTOW
    Participant
    22548

    Feminists already think all sex is rape.

    They all want to be victims. They all have rape/dominated fantasies. And they all want to screw up mens lives.

    Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

    #611801
    +3
    Secret Agent MGTOW
    Secret Agent MGTOW
    Participant
    22548

    This is false rape. It is attempting to be created to give women who regret sleeping with someone yet another way to blame shift, guilt shame, and screw over, the men they regret voluntarily sleeping with, later on.

    And they wonder why men stay away from women like themselves.

    Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

    #611811
    +2
    743 roadmaster
    743 roadmaster
    Participant

    stop giving the dog a bone

    mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

    #611821
    +3
    Genesis
    Genesis
    Participant
    420

    I suppose you’re right Phoenix, but when people try hard to conjure ways of “being raped” It p~~~es me off and it sends me to a very dark place where jail, therapy, lost work, no sleep, 2 instances of scholarship tuition taken away and other hardships were prevalent before finally being able to look the neighboring band of opportunistic false sexual assault complainants in the eyes without the irrational desire to fling a plethora of rocks at them.

    Ridiculing or having a laugh at supporters of bogus socialjustice ‘rape’ ideologies is one of my less frequent ways of dealing my daily doses.

    #611943
    +4

    Anonymous
    43

    wait until just being a man is conspiracy to commit rape.

    #611950
    +2
    Surfdude12
    surfdude12
    Participant
    4103

    Dudes logic in video:

    She said “yes” but didn’t mean it cause she felt forced cause it was only THIRD TIME she came over voluntarily to my place after me trying last 2 times

    #611953
    +4
    Surfdude12
    surfdude12
    Participant
    4103

    Dude just posted a RAPE CONFESSION video. Any bitch should get a lawyer and sue this dips~~~ right now and just say it was her. He’s so f~~~ing dumb he’d deserve it

    #612121
    +3
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    Consensual rape cannot exist since women cannot consent to sex.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #612126
    +2
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    Feminists already think all sex is rape.

    Nope, that applies just when it’s man+female.
    If a woman force another woman into lesbian sex then it cannot be rape since both are victims.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #612129
    +3
    IRuleMe
    IRuleMe
    Participant

    There is no such thing as consensual rape. Either it was consensual, or it was rape. If the one being “raped” agrees to be “raped”, then it’s not rape is it? Obviously not.

    #612213
    +3
    Ever5
    Ever5
    Participant
    1008

    This is going to be extremely controversial. So first let me say, I’m not interested in being with a woman who is not interested in being with me. Now I’m going to say some stuff that is controversial and doesn’t correlate to my personal perspective on morality and what is healthy and all that. But I think it’s worth consideration.

    I remember reading something, it was old, it was an old law book, like 1700’s, 1800’s, and I don’t remember which one it was. It was talking about what constitutes rape. Basically what it said was if the woman didn’t fight back, scratch, bite, etc. then it wasn’t rape. And also, everything I’m about to say doesn’t seem to apply in our modern reality, especially on this subject.

    Consent is a strange concept for most people. They think it’s about being “happy”, including after the fact. We’ve all bought something and had “buyers remorse”. Either, O I shouldn’t have bought that. What if …. was better. Like I just bought a van. I had done all the research, been set on this particular van for over 6 weeks. Went and bought it, I come home and all I can think of is yeah… it’s nice but that other van would have been more convenient in these particular situations. Like I bought a high top. I know I wanted a high top because I want to be able to stand up inside the van and cook. Then I get home and all I can think of is, yeah but what if I want to park in a parking garage. I can’t park in a parking garage with a tall van, yet I can’t stand up in a normal van and be comfortable as I want. Buyer’s remorse. It’s common. Xbox vs PS4.

    I consented to buying the van, however, I still have doubts.

    Now lets take another consideration. Someone joins the military. If you join the military, you are going to have to deal with people you don’t like and you are going to have to do s~~~ at times that you don’t like doing. However, you consented to joining the military.

    Same with a job.

    Lets say you are starving and the only job you can get is a really crappy job. If you don’t get the job, you starve and die. Well, that’s consent. You chose to go to work vs dying. It’s still consent.

    Consent has nothing to do with good feelings, bad feelings. It’s an agreement, expressed or implied. Expressed being spoken or in writing. Implied being in behavior.

    If a woman does not fight back, theoretically it could be construed as implied consent. Especially if she doesn’t speak up and “express” that this is not something she wants, with something like “I’m scared right now and I don’t know what to do”, just anything to state what is going on.

    Consent often occurs simply by impulse. It’s not even thought out if you get really really deep into the nature of consent. There’s no, I want or I should or anything. It’s simply an action, an impulse, a behavior. Like someone tells you to do something and you do it, and you don’t know this individual and they aren’t paying for you. Yet if you do it, it’s consent. Like “Hey you, pick that up and bring it over here.” Even if you don’t “want” to do it, but you did it anyway because you felt like it was the “right” thing to do… or you got “scare” because who ever said it was big and scary. It’s still consent.

    People consent to stuff all the time because they are afraid or feel shame or guilt. But if they don’t speak up and say, “Why are you asking me to pick that up?”, “Do I know you?”, etc. it’s still consent.

    Same with a dare. Someone dares someone to do something, and they don’t want to do it but they succumb to peer pressure. That’s consent.

    Now all that said. When it comes to women in the modern time. He said she said kinda stuff. All this crap I just said, throw it out the window. The modern world is not rational, it doesn’t make any sense. You are taking your chances. It’s getting to the point where people are literally signing pieces of paper, consent papers, and then having secret audio recording in the room, taking pictures of text messages on their phone to keep a record.

    it’s really gotten out of hand. And false claims, or a woman regretting it the next day and then making up a story, all these things are certainly something to be paranoid about. But I wanted to share my thoughts, my opinions, on what I “believe” the nature of consent really and truly is, past all the modern day confusion and double speak and just all out insanity. And this perspective on consent, it doesn’t seem to apply in modern society. Though, this makes sense. While the other stuff, like this guy’s video make no sense.

    She probably had sex with him, and he sucked in bed. That’s why she didn’t call the next day. Or she felt it was gross. Or she just wanted some new D. Or maybe she regretted it and had buyers remorse. I don’t know. I wasn’t there. But to call that situation “rape”, which is a crime where people get hurt and violated, is a real disservice to the people out there who actually have been raped.

    Truth has no place to live in the mind of a woman.

    #612268
    +2
    Puffin Stuff
    Puffin Stuff
    Participant
    24979

    The charge of rape shouldn’t be laid upon a man unless there is physical evidence of sexual assault such as cuts and bruises.

    Otherwise it’s he said she said. Period.

    Logic must prevail in civilized society no matter how much we want to coddle women and how much they demand we do.

    Women have abused our trust in them. They have run roughshod over the rights of men once they had the slightest ability to do so. When feminists are given power their final solution is to decimate men and leaver the rest destitute and suicidal.

    And it’s ahead of schedule and working better than the feminists could imagine.

    Make public spaces unsafe for men and men have withdrawn from society.

    Men have gone their own way.

    #icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

    #612495
    Deadly Raver
    Deadly Raver
    Participant

    I left a post in there with a solution to the problem. Let’s see how many try to argue against it.

    Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

    #612517
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    The charge of rape shouldn’t be laid upon a man unless there is physical evidence of sexual assault such as cuts and bruises.

    Otherwise it’s he said she said. Period.

    Logic must prevail in civilized society no matter how much we want to coddle women and how much they demand we do.

    Women have abused our trust in them. They have run roughshod over the rights of men once they had the slightest ability to do so. When feminists are given power their final solution is to decimate men and leaver the rest destitute and suicidal.

    And it’s ahead of schedule and working better than the feminists could imagine.

    Make public spaces unsafe for men and men have withdrawn from society.

    Men have gone their own way.

    I actually have argued (online) with a feminist alleging that a lesbian whore falsely accusing 15 different men (it happened in UK) in different places and times, should be considered (according her) a single case of false accusation and not 15…

    So, I’m going to quote someone else

    Funny women are focused on the sexual aspect of robots while chef bots their other replacement flies completely over their head. We can all clearly observe that even women now only see themselves as being good for sex.

    and

    Brutality! Finish her! Excellent!

    and

    In the future with sex robots women will become a rarity. As technology will allow men to have a son grown in an artificial womb. The only women born would be those for the few men who still want to reproduce the old fashion way. You may see women only make up 5% of the population and thus will be collectible like an antique car, but as demand for real women is almost 0, religious people will take most of them and the few women who are super hot may be included in the harem of some rich guy.

    In the future, only the poor and illiterate will have actual women. SEXBOTS ARE THE FUTURE!!

    It’ll be spiral to male-only society the moment artificial reproduction hits the market

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #612519
    +1
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    Consensual Rape……The newest SJW buzzword.

    Wait until they figure out . . . you can’t “rape” the willing.

    Give it time.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #612522
    +1

    Anonymous
    3

    The charge of rape shouldn’t be laid upon a man unless there is physical evidence of sexual assault such as cuts and bruises.

    Otherwise it’s he said she said. Period.

    Logic must prevail in civilized society no matter how much we want to coddle women and how much they demand we do.

    Women have abused our trust in them. They have run roughshod over the rights of men once they had the slightest ability to do so. When feminists are given power their final solution is to decimate men and leaver the rest destitute and suicidal.

    And it’s ahead of schedule and working better than the feminists could imagine.

    Make public spaces unsafe for men and men have withdrawn from society.

    Men have gone their own way.

    The charge of rape should really only be taken seriously if a man breaks into a woman’s home.

    Otherwise, and this is obvious to everyone, its clear the woman is taking steps to create that sexual tension and desires for sex to happen. That was the mentality before modern feminism. If you read a lot of books, it comes up sometimes. A woman visiting a man in the evening alone—it’s obvious why. There is no rape charge, even if the man speaks of forcing himself onto her. One example of this is in Dostoyevsky’s “Crime and Punishment” when Roskolnikov’s sister visits that “scoundrel”.

    Muslims require a woman to be accompanied by a male relative or husband when she is going out. And then she has power over the home, and a man can’t enter it without her permission. She is covered when she leaves her home as well.

    Women just can not function in public spaces, we have seen that. They always complain they’re women and so need special privileges, which are always of course at men’s expense and ruin everyone else’s experiences.

    Especially now with more automation and drones being able to deliver groceries and goods, there is even less reason for women to be out.

    Society is going to have to shift and it will going forward, because these current philosophies are unsustainable. There was some leeway given to women to make things easy for them, and they took complete advantage by making sure to f~~~ things up as much as possible, and they defended each other over it rather than saying “no, punish this woman for causing problems, we are not with her”.

    #612524
    +1
    Ghost
    ghost
    Participant

    Muslims require a woman to be accompanied by a male relative or husband when she is going out.

    99.99% of Muslims in the United States DO NOT follow the god damn Quran. The women pick and choose. I would be willing to turn in to a f~~~ing Muslim again if these bitches would actually follow their own f~~~ing religion.

    Someone please f~~~ing shoot me.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 23 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.