Chivalry is dead and this is why

[hdvrodParticipant 1109]

I can’t link the pic I wanted……

Anyway communication, real open communication, is not wanted or even required in a relationship. Women cannot handle fully open and honest communication, plus most perceive it as a weakness on the part of a man. All that is required is catering to her whims, and even then nothing is certain. There is no way to be sure of having a successful relationshit with a woman. MGTaoist

[X11Spectator 4520]

Just because you can’t link a pic does not mean chivalry is dead.

[ghostParticipant]

[Anonymous 6]

Let’s clear up a big misconception that the media will never discuss and the feminists don’t realize.

Chivalry has never had anything to do with women. NEVER!!! Chivalry was how soldiers and knights conducted themselves during battle. They practiced civilized fighting in war. They didn’t fight erratically and out of order. When guns came around, the soldiers would line up in a long line, fire their weapons, step back, another group would step up, fire theirs. By the time the second group fired, the first group should be reloaded and ready to fire again.

They repeated that process over and over. That’s why when Europeans came to America, and fought the Indians, they called the Indians “Savages” because they didn’t fight like that. The Indians fought in a manner that is now known as “guerrilla warfare”. The Indians were deceitful, and would do anything they had to do in order to win. They did no such thing as civilized war.

Again, “Chivalry” is about soldiers behavior during battle. It has nothing to do with women. So when you hear a woman talk about men being “chivalrous”, tell her what i just said.

[ghostParticipant]

X11 wrote:

Just because you can’t link a pic does not mean chivalry is not dead.

Fixed.

[IRuleMeParticipant]

[Anonymous 12]

Chivalry was about how wealthy men (Knights) treated other wealthy men (other Knights) in combat. A Knight was expected to be merciful to those below him but even then there were loop holes.

It was never about opening doors for women etc.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

I would open a door for some skanky old slag but only if the door was the gate to hell.

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

Chivalry and feminism: two sides of the same gynocentric coin.

While what Venom says about the word chivalry is true, the meaning of the word was co-opted a lot longer ago than you may think. I don’t see much point in debating the true definition of a word that’s been used a particular way for about 900 years (since Eleanor of Aquitaine).

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[SandalsParticipant 4253]

Can’t Stump Trump wrote:

While what Venom says about the word chivalry is true, the meaning of the word was co-opted a lot longer ago than you may think.

We’ll just add it to the list of co-opted words:

– There’s nothing chilvarous about Chilvary
– There’s nothing feminine about Feminism
– There’s nothing liberal about Liberalism
– There’s nothing conservative about Conservatism
– There’s nothing diverse about Diversity
– There’s no longer universal truth at a University
– There’s nothing gay about being Gay
– There’s nothing homosexual about rainbows (which are otherwise very beautiful)
– There’s nothing legal about Law

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

I don’t pay attention to the sex of the person. I try to hold the door if someone is following close behind me. To me it’s just social civility.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[SandalsParticipant 4253]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

I don’t pay attention to the sex of the person. I try to hold the door if someone is following close behind me. To me it’s just social civility.

I do. If it’s a man, I hold it. If it’s a woman, I let it go. Not just because women don’t deserve it, but’s it’s too damn dangerous. Women have no sense of balance, symmetry, or angular momentum. They always reach across their body with the wrong arm, twisting their body, and they don’t fully catch the door and are unstable, leaving the bulk of the torque on you as you’re forced to move closer to the hinge. And it’s usually a big glass door. Then you have to stand there and hold the heavy side of the door while the t~~~ takes forever trying to adjust herself, and it all just becomes a big mess.

They just can’t get the hang of catching a door, and I end up getting hit in the heal. F~~~ that. I look in the corner of my eye to see if it’s a girl, and then I let it swing and they’re on their own, while I pretend I don’t see them.

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

Men= trying to kill me

Women= trying to kill me.

Solved

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Anonymous wrote:

They repeated that process over and over. That’s why when Europeans came to America, and fought the Indians, they called the Indians “Savages” because they didn’t fight like that. The Indians fought in a manner that is now known as “guerrilla warfare”. The Indians were deceitful, and would do anything they had to do in order to win. They did no such thing as civilized war.

I’m with the Indians here f~~~ having a so called civilized war.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[DocParticipant]

When I am out and about in public or at work I treat women the same way I treat men. I don’t discriminate against them. If I hold a door for a man, I’ll hold a door for a woman. Purely because politeness keeps me focussed.

It’s possible to be polite to people and maintain the MGTOW mindset. Blending in, not standing out.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[Jim01Participant 6678]

Anonymous wrote:

Let’s clear up a big misconception that the media will never discuss and the feminists don’t realize.

Chivalry has never had anything to do with women. NEVER!!! Chivalry was how soldiers and knights conducted themselves during battle. They practiced civilized fighting in war. They didn’t fight erratically and out of order. When guns came around, the soldiers would line up in a long line, fire their weapons, step back, another group would step up, fire theirs. By the time the second group fired, the first group should be reloaded and ready to fire again.

They repeated that process over and over. That’s why when Europeans came to America, and fought the Indians, they called the Indians “Savages” because they didn’t fight like that. The Indians fought in a manner that is now known as “guerrilla warfare”. The Indians were deceitful, and would do anything they had to do in order to win. They did no such thing as civilized war.

Again, “Chivalry” is about soldiers behavior during battle. It has nothing to do with women. So when you hear a woman talk about men being “chivalrous”, tell her what i just said.

Never knew that and an interesting of trivia! Thanks for posting

[Author]

Posts