China’s Divorce Law Favors Men

[RoyDalParticipant]

News: China Did A Thing!
Turd Flinging Monkey

China got the whole divorce settlement terms fixed right: She can’t take it away from him if he paid for it, and the same goes for him if she paid for it. Good!

This actually old news from 2011, but it is the first I’ve heard of it.

The West has a lot to learn from China’s growth and economic success. They are so good at some things, it’s positively scary. Well, what is really scary is how short sighted the “leaders” of the West are by letting feminists rule the roost.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Anonymous 26]

wow goes to show that in the communist country of China…. the law is as it should be: blind and balanced to logic instead of being weighed by greedy lawyers!

The western courts could learn a lot from the east!

Are you reading this lurkers…. China is light years ahead in equality and JUSTICE compared to the west!

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10909]

Nice video Sir. I’ve always found the Chinese culture interesting. It doesn’t surprise me that they got it right and understand the value of the men in their culture. If we ever see something like this in the West, we’ll have to provide proof of purchase. I can see a married man saving the receipts for everything he buys and putting them in a safety deposit box for fear that the wife might find them and destroy them. She would only do this in hopes of securing what she believes to be her fair share in a divorce. No receipt, no proof.
China’s divorce law doesn’t favor the men, it favors the individual that has the most INVESTED in the marriage. It’s not our fault ladies that it just happens to be the man.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Blue SkiesParticipant 15665]

in western countries, the citizens vote and 53% of population are women…the western society does not appreciate the value of men.

in addition, many rich corporations pour out money in support of feminism….one can speculate why they are doing this.

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Is anyone surprised? For all its enormous population, China’s one-child policy, and the social consequences they failed to take into account, now has the country staring down the barrel of demographic collapse, and that has them scared s~~~less. Here’s basically what happened over there:

Decades ago China decided to limit its population growth as a tool of long term economic growth. To do this they implemented the “One Child Policy” where each couple is limited to a single offspring, male or female. They failed to take into account the economic preference in China for sons as well as masculine and feminine natures. That preference exists not because of any preferences for penises on their children, but because in China it’s sons who are obligated to care for their parents, not daughters. Sons are their parents retirement plans. Daughters are just an economic burden. So female fetuses were aborted in staggering numbers, and the generation that grew up was overwhelmingly male. That generation also grew up with a serious sense of entitlement that comes from being an only child. The imbalanced sex ratio and only-child entitlement supercharged the hypergamous nature of multiple generations of female Chinese. Instead of finding one man when they were young and then settling down to have children, they spent their prime reproductive years playing the field as hard as they could for as much benefit to themselves as possible. They extorted rich gifts from prospective suitors. They repeatedly married, and then divorced, for money. And so on, until they aged out of their reproductive years and became too old to play that game any more, because an imbalanced sex ratio does not change the biological fact that a woman’s reproductive capacity peaks at around 20 and declines at 30. Meanwhile China failed to take into account the fact that a large number of men, when faced with a stacked deck like that, will simply refuse to play. And without wives or families to support they are significantly less productive as individuals. So China is left with a population of a huge number of self sufficient but non-surplus producing men and an equally huge population of non-reproductive “Leftover Women”. And since it’s wombs that limit reproductive capacity, with so many of their wombs aborted before birth or aged out of their reproductive capacity thanks to hypergamy run amok, they are looking at generational population collapse. In an economy that depends on teeming masses of low cost practically slave labor, that’s long term economic suicide.

So it should be no surprise they are trying to rein in hypergamy with legal reforms like this. I expect them to go even further in the future, I have my doubts that it will do them any good, though, because laws like this operate generationaly, and I don’t think they have the time.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

Good. About f~~~ing time. And of course, women always overvaluing their own contributions to a marriage. No, you’re not allowed to have it both ways. If you didn’t work for it, if you didn’t pay for it, then you don’t get half of it. Your services aren’t “priceless” they have value. You can tell that’s just a bitch grasping at straws. Besides, this is still a better deal than men have been getting, so I don’t wanna hear your crying. Suck it up, buttercup.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[Anonymous 1]

Hey, but remember, Gold digging is only a WESTERN women problem. Not all ASIAN women are like that… Oh, wait…

Yeah, the articles may be old, but the conclusions from it is even older. I wonder where all those guys that kept comming here to say: “Asian women know the value of men” are. This is just another article showing that AWALT. That women are only as good as the law permit them to be. So much for “love” and “empathy” from their part. At least the goverment over there seems to been doing something right.

However, that is more the reason for me not to get involved with women. I mean, if all that is keeping these c~~~s from stealing from me (not to mention trying to KILL ME. Did you hear the “prisons in China full of women that tried to kill their husbands” part?!?! WTF…) is the goverment, what guarantee do I have that they will not stab in the back (literally, in the case of a chinese woman) if the politicians change their minds. These guys (politicians) are known for not being the most consistent men breathing in ANY nation (NAPALT, maybe? “not all politicians are like that”).

So yeah, TradCons are more than welcome to keep a “fragile woman” (asian or otherwise) in their house. I rather have a good night of sleep without the fear of having my throat sliced open during my rest because my “not like that” partner decided she is bored with me and want my stuff.

Cheers.

[Wolf redpillmanSpectator 1658]

Off to china i go.i always. Feel attracted to chineses females,that chinese female at that chineses restaurant in.my area always giving that look as saying to me f~~~ me but then.i think.and said no this.is usa she.probably one.of that princess that feel entitle to everything

[BeerParticipant 11832]

RoyDal wrote:

China got the whole divorce settlement terms fixed right: She can’t take it away from him if he paid for it, and the same goes for him if she paid for it. Good!

This is how it should be here as well. Nobody should “win” in a divorce, they should look at what you both contributed and split it up based upon that. If I’m earning 100k a year and she is earning 30k a year why the hell is it a 50/50 split if it doesn’t work?

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

China has thousands of years of history to draw knowledge from. Their rules in freedom of speech leave a little to be desired but, as we can see in the west, people freely give that up anyway.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[narwhalParticipant]

I see that as a step in the right direction, but it doesn’t go far enough in my opinion. The more I think about it, the more I’d like to see a marriage treated more like a corporation in many ways. In this modern age, it would be no problem for bank account(s) to be created that keeps track of the money deposited from the 2 individuals in a marriage. Money can be withdrawn only from the account with the signed consent of both individuals. Assets purchased with the account would be owned by the marriage, not by the individuals. In the case of divorce, liquidate all assets and divide the cash according to the percentage of contributions to the account. Retirement accounts are excluded from consideration as they were never owned by the marriage.

Heck, she still even comes out ahead with her lesser salary as the interest and asset appreciation on the marriage account is likely to be greater than what she could get on her own.

Ok. Then do it.

[Author]

Posts