Chad Thunderc~~~ goes on a date.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Image credit: Captain Capitalism
http://captaincapitalism.blogspot.com/2015/12/every-woman-who-ever-voted-democrat-ever.html

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[The Skank SpankerParticipant 1372]

Chad is a confident, dominant, goal-oriented, forward man that takes what he wants.

And I get why women like that and why mangina’s are frustrated by this. In PUA terms: Average Frustrated Chumps (AFC’s).

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

In my experience, women like being treated like s~~~. Be a smart ass, treat her like dirt, and be a douche generally gets you a fair amount of pussy. And I don’t really have any “game”. It’s not really how I wanted to treat women, but that’s how I did back a few years ago. Even now I do it from time to time. They think it’s in a playful way hahaha

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Confident, dominant, goal-oriented and forward don’t have to mean sticking a woman with debt and a baby any more than they have to mean screwing a business partner out of his share of an investment.

I told a woman I started seeing recently “I have one request, one suggestion and one promise I will make you. I request that if you feel a problem, a doubt or a concern about anything we’re doing, that you sit down with me, look me in the eyes and tell me your truth. My suggestion is that you do it in a positive way, using positive language and tone, and hoping for a positive outcome. My promise is that if you fail to do this, I will drop you like a f~~~ing bad habit, I swear to god I will. You’ll be gone so fast you won’t even know what happened. Deal?”

Of course no woman would ever deny that communication is important in a relationship because that’s their excuse to talk about every damn thing ever. I made it clear “I’m not talking about communication… that’s too easy for anyone to define however they like. I mean literally go talk to your best friend and vent about it, take some time to sit in the dark and work it through for yourself, then come to me, look me in the eye and tell me your truth… whatever that may be. Do that and we’ll get along fine. Fail to do it and there won’t be any we.”

You can’t get much more confident and forward than that… and as soon as she violates that agreement, she’s out. I give it about three weeks.

[VeniversumParticipant 492]

Accurate summary

[Anonymous 11]

Chad naturally doesn’t have to do anything to have women turning flips for him hence he’s confident.

If you’re a Thunderc~~~, it really does not matter what you do or do not do.

Chad can live in a tent under a bridge and score. Chad can live in a trailer and score. Chad can live in The Hamptons and really, really score. Hell, Chad can even live in his mom’s basement having no car or job going without a bath for three weeks and still score.

Chad is only given life by the f~~~ed up nature of the thought processes going on within a woman’s brain.

I’ve been focusing more on Chads lately giving manginas a rest for a while.

@doc: I like your version of my cheat on me, and I’ll drop you like a hot rock spiel.

[narwhalParticipant]

Is there really a point to telling them what’s going to happen when they start behaving badly? Is a warning going to stop them from testing the boundaries? We they even be able to figure out an accept why they got dropped?

I have no doubt that, warning or not, they will behave the same as they do with any other guy, and will the next guy as well. They will not learn, they’ll go talk to their girlfriends who will lie to them and tell them they did nothing wrong. It won’t be exactly a lie either since they next guy will probably let them get away with it.

Honestly though, I think I tend to let them know what my boundaries are, either before or as they break them, just for my own satisfaction.

Ok. Then do it.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Look at doc peac~~~ing, demanding truth….lol.

Re-read what I said… I am not demanding anything and I am certainly not demanding truth. I requested “her truth”… not THE truth… her truth.

I specifically use the words “request” and “your truth” because I know for a fact am reasonably certain she will not honor the request nor does she have any idea what her truth is, if such a thing even exists for her.

At this point I’m starting to wonder what your motivation and intention are for your comments in this thread. How do you define “peac~~~ing”, for example? Are you implying that I am using PUA techniques simply because I have relations with females?

[JackinovParticipant 5229]

Stargazer wrote:

Survivor wrote:

Look at doc peac~~~ing, demanding truth….lol.

Re-read what I said… I am not demanding anything and I am certainly not demanding truth. I requested “her truth”… not THE truth… her truth.

I specifically use the words “request” and “your truth” because I know for a fact she will not honor the request nor does she have any idea what her truth is, if such a thing even exists for her.

At this point I’m starting to wonder what your motivation and intention are for your comments in this thread. How do you define “peac~~~ing”, for example? Are you implying that I am using PUA techniques simply because I have relations with females?

Survivor can’t imagine a world where men are actually straightforward with women and lay down base rules that both parties agree and stick to.

are you a chia pet in man drag

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

narwhal wrote:

Is there really a point to telling them what’s going to happen when they start behaving badly? Is a warning going to stop them from testing the boundaries? We they even be able to figure out an accept why they got dropped?

You’re making the mistake of assuming I’m telling them what’s going to happen in order to effect their behavior or understanding, I am not. I’m doing so in order to effect my own behavior and understanding,

I treat relations with females the same way I treat contracts with men. I state what I intend to do and what I desire to get for it, as well as what I see to be the failure conditions and what actions I will take if and when those conditions are met. And then I abide by those statements. They can and will behave however they want but I have clarity and they can choose to have it as well if they wish to, or not.

It’s the same as if I tell you my life strategy: 1) act first to create and exchange value 2) always exchange value fairly 3) if cheated, end the exchange and sever connections 4) rinse and repeat

Nothing about this is in any way intended to constrain or modify your behavior or enforce understanding upon you. I might make a request, a suggestion and even a promise if we were to engage with each other in some point of trade, but you are bound by nothing but your own strategy and your own choices and are required to understand nothing beyond what you are able and willing to understand.

I’ve done nothing but state my principles and standards and the conditions of my behavior and you’re free to take them to heart or ignore them as you choose. Make sense?

[OgreParticipant 5863]

Crystal clear Doc. I think Survivor was just ribbing you.

At some point you know that given every possible opportunity eventually most people, men included, would fail to follow a clear cut explanation of the boundaries.

If there was clarity and honesty between the sexes I think a hell of a lot fewer men would be here.

Your laying out the rules of engagement is a great benchmark for starting out honestly. Your assessment of a three week engagement shows the sad state of affairs in interpersonal relationships.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Ogre wrote:

Crystal clear Doc. I think Survivor was just ribbing you.

It’s hard to tell through text, which is why I tend to be wordy when it comes to explanations and comments. I feel confident that my statements here leave no room for doubt about my position.

Anyway, you’re right about clarity. We as MGTOW have little reason to believe that it will make any difference to females or have any effect on their behavior and choices, but we can still be clear for our own purposes and sense of personal value.

Standards, principles and honor aren’t for other people anyway, they are for us as individuals. If others see, respect and desire to emulate them or not, so be it.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Survivor, your continued engagement in personal insults and shaming behavior makes me wonder if you aren’t a “ho” yourself.

Perhaps it’s time this site implement an “unfollow” option so that people with poor attitudes and interpersonal skills can be more efficiently ignored.

[Honorable_Juice_BoxParticipant 591]

Stargazer wrote:

Survivor, your continued engagement in personal insults and shaming behavior makes me wonder if you aren’t a “ho” yourself.

Perhaps it’s time this site implement an “unfollow” option so that people with poor attitudes and interpersonal skills can be more efficiently ignored.

I agree that some sort of “downvote” option would be nice, though to be honest that opens the floodgates for more trolls.

Don’t forget that there are also those who believe that any MGTOW who still engages with females is a traitor and will never change that view so it’s hardly worth trying. I personally do not engage with women, but would never tell another man not to, such is the nature of choosing your own way.

In regards to the comic; women would certainly decry that these men never state their intentions so clearly, and are blindsided when they take such actions: “one day he just changed.”

At the same time however women almost never communicate their own intentions or thoughts, and are able to communicate with one another effectively.

[JackinovParticipant 5229]

Survivor seems to be like one of those people who make a bad song, and upon receiving flack for it, say, “HAH! The jokes on you! It was but a parody!”

are you a chia pet in man drag

[The Skank SpankerParticipant 1372]

@doc.

Being confident and forward in your way of dealing with women is a good thing. I actually like your way of dealing with women that way. Maybe I should start setting similar boundaries at the start for women too. This technique actually shows some inner Chad too.

But, after quoting me about what a Chad actually is. I would much rather read about your definition of a Chad if you -oppose- my argument. Because I still think a Chad is made by these character traits. Then again you have natural Chads and “made” Chads, I would describe the latter as self-learnt “PUA Chads”. Then we have the loser, druggie Chads, but also the “successful” Hugh Heffner type of Chads. BUT, admitting women would go for a loser Chad sleeping under a bridge, you would are implying women are not into money and status. Which is simply false.

But we can all agree that a Chad has an aura of direct, confident, forward, high-esteem, c~~~y-funny communication going on there besides having wealth, status, social value OR NOT

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Honestly I’ve seen people use the phrase “Chad Thunderc~~~” but I don’t know where it comes from or what exactly it’s supposed to mean so I won’t be using that term myself.

I’m going to assume that we’re talking about the kind of men that women claim not to like but typically give themselves to sexually… confident, powerful men with options… genetically superior and dominant over other men. It’s been my experience that these are the qualities that signal to a woman that a man meets her instinctual criteria as an ideal inseminator and protector/provider.

It’s also been my experience that most women are reluctant, at best, to openly acknowledge that this is what they prefer, but that’s irrelevant… we understand it to be true and, if we are intellectually honest, we must also accept it as their nature and embrace that nature the same as we embrace our own.

Going back to what defines a genetically superior and dominant male… do I really need to do that? The point I attempted to make earlier is that speaking of this type of man as though he must leave a path of misery behind him is disingenuous and smacks of sour graping. As rational men, we profess to understand the importance of good genetics and the valuable role that confidence and dominance have in our sex and species… so how can we then turn around and smear the men who embody those traits and, through them, successfully attract the sexual interest of women?

A strong, confident and dominant man does not, perforce, have to put a baby into a woman and leave her wallowing in debt and misery. Some subset of strong, confident men may do so, but these are not defining behaviors of the superset. Strength, confidence and sexual attractiveness do not necessitate irresponsible behavior any more than being wealthy requires that a man be a criminal… but it’s my opinion that the same types people who maintain that all wealth is the product of crime are the same types of people who would say all men that women find sexually desirable are assholes.

For a person who believes these sorts of things, I would borrow and use another phrase that I typically would avoid… “Methinks thou doth protest too much,”

[VeniversumParticipant 492]

The proper response for people who are being irrational, or who use ad hominem, straw man, and other fallacies like that is to first confront them about it, and explain to them the futility of their behavior. After that, if the behavior continues, the best response is simply to ignore them, and discontinue replying to their posts, no matter what they say. They will starve for attention. The speaker on a subject has no relevance; it is arguments that must be confronted in order to come to a mutual understanding and conclusion of the truth. No one can respect criticism of the speaker. Gone are the days of it’s effectiveness. We will no longer be manipulated.

[AttonParticipant]

Chad Thunderc~~~ a true gentleman who knows what a woman want.
18 inches of pure hell from behind

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[experiencedParticipant]

I agree with Doc.
Set the rules.
They will be positively impressed.
Be ready to dump them the same second they break the rule. The second they break it, it was already over, the dumping is mere formality.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Author]

Posts