CBC did an article on deadbeat dads, one sided of course

[sagebrushParticipant 1]

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/deadbeats-across-canada-owe-more-than-3-7b-in-support-1.2782955

CBC just did an article on deadbeat dads only one sided of course but it sounds like major trouble is brewing with very little of the facts known to the public, unfortunately men in general dont grumble or make a lot of noise about their situations so nobody knows. Somehow we have to make it known that the “guideline” amounts are ridiculous, and easier to get orders changed in this day and age of major job losses, pay cuts and sometimes just bad luck. Also we need visitations attached to support orders and maybe even enforced counselling of the primary caretaker to minimize the game playing for visitation. Anyway I liked a lot of the comment below the posted article unfortunately they cut off comments when too many went against the article

[KeymasterKeymaster]

OH yeah? Well anyone who uses the word “deadbeat dads” can go f~~~ themselves, because we already proved there is no such thing. And here is evidence:

/video/wendy-williams-teaches-women-to-trap-men-into-fatherhood/

Men don’t OWE those bitches a GODDAM. RED. CENT. They are FRAUDS. Just because it’s still legal in this country for a woman to allow herself to get pregnant without a man’s consent…. doesn’t make him “deadbeat dad” when she can’t extort his money.

Thank you for posting the link.
We will try and work it into the article (or another) somehow.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

This is all about the money for the bankers.  Why the bankers?  Because the government make payments to the bankers.  Not only the father have to pay the tax but the mother who receives the money so it’s more taxes.  Clearly the bankers need to go.  We can deal with real public finical institutions like the credit unions where the shares are owned by each individual account owner.  Credit unions do not get money from the government since they don’t loan any money.

 

If you are not dealing with a credit union it’s a good time to start.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[jambearParticipant 282]

In my mind (please feel free to correct me if I am wrong) if we want to achieve true equality we would have to do one of two things. If a woman got pregnant but the father did not want it that would be grounds for an abortion, just like a woman has the right to abort a fetus even if it is against the wishes of the father. But as a clause you could put in there is if the woman wanted to keep the pregnancy against the wishes of the father then it should be an automatic release of the father from any future support payments; as the mother had the child against the consent of the father and the same rights would apply to the mother if the father wanted the child but the mother did not want to keep the child. This was it gives both sexes a way out if it was an accidental pregnancy or if one of them wanted to keep the child. Thoughts?

[Author]

Posts