Cat Ladies

[VerusParticipant 965]

Just for laughs I have a profile on a dating site. I’m not interested in finding dates, but I like to occasionally check out the dating scene out of curiousity. And for laughs. I’m in my 50s, so I get quite a few desperate women in my age range contacting me to no avail. Something I’ve noticed about the women on dating sites, particularly the older ones – most of them seem to have cats.

To me, having a cat would make any woman a non-starter. I have a severe cat allergy. Years ago I dated a woman with a cat, and her callous attitude toward my suffering was one of the reasons I broke up with her. And cat allergies are very common. Cat owners will say that you can always take medicine to control allergy symptoms, and over time your immune system may adapt. But why would you date someone who puts a pet ahead of you, requiring you to suffer and take meds to accommodate her pet? In my view, if the relationship with the cat is worth making me miserable, it’s more important to her than me, and if I’m valued below the cat, it’s goodbye. Besides I hate having everything I own covered in cat hair, potentially being used as a scratching post, and the smell of cat p~~~ and s~~~ isn’t perfume to my nose.

I’m sure there are guys who love their cats too. And dogs. And my comments aren’t really applicable to MGTOW, because if you are avoiding relationships with women pets are great company. And your choice of pet isn’t going to be an issue if you aren’t interested in marrying or cohabitating. I have kids living with me – that’s an instant turnoff to a lot of women, and understandably so, but it’s not an issue because I won’t be dating and won’t bring a woman into my home. But it seems to me as soon as you decide to take on a pet you are already choosing that animal – in a woman’s case a furry substitute for a child -over any potential partner that would not want to live with that animal. They have already in a sense chosen the cat over a large number of men in the dating market who are going to see that as an immediate swipe to the left. So how important is a man to these cat ladies anyway? Not as important as their fur babies. And knowing that, any woman who owns a cat is a red flag. It’s an indicator that she isn’t serious about a relationship with a man.

You’re never going to come before a single mother’s kids (understandable), but the same goes for a single woman’s cat. That’s a bitter pill no man should be willing to swallow.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

I guess I don’t take it QUITE as seriously as you do. We all make choices in our life. And each of those choices limit other choices. The opportunity cost of making a decision is all of the other decisions that now can’t be made because of one you did make.

If you make the decision to have a cat, you are going exclude dating people with cat allergies. And (here’s the tough part for some people) you don’t get to complain about the person with the allergies if they don’t want to hang out with you. But again, when you take away all reason and accountability then you get the crazy part of the crazy cat lady.

Order the good wine

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

Women with dogs can be just as annoying. Notice the key is multiple dogs, for some reason they act differently than women who are dedicated to only one. It’s like having a pack of 5 year olds who never grow up, and the women are too old (and/or lazy) to keep up with them. It is also usually dependant on the breed, women tend to like little yappy neurotic useless lap dogs with hereditary health issues.

Sovereignty above all else.

[VerusParticipant 965]

Knights Templar Rising wrote:

Women with dogs can be just as annoying. Notice the key is multiple dogs, for some reason they act differently than women who are dedicated to only one. It’s like having a pack of 5 year olds who never grow up, and the women are too old (and/or lazy) to keep up with them. It is also usually dependant on the breed, women tend to like little yappy neurotic useless lap dogs with hereditary health issues.

I’ve noticed the same thing. Including the tendency toward lap dogs.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22523]

Verus wrote:

Just for laughs I have a profile on a dating site. I’m not interested in finding dates, but I like to occasionally check out the dating scene out of curiousity. And for laughs. I’m in my 50s, so I get quite a few desperate women in my age range contacting me to no avail. Something I’ve noticed about the women on dating sites, particularly the older ones – most of them seem to have cats.
To me, having a cat would make any woman a non-starter. I have a severe cat allergy. Years ago I dated a woman with a cat, and her callous attitude toward my suffering was one of the reasons I broke up with her. And cat allergies are very common. Cat owners will say that you can always take medicine to control allergy symptoms, and over time your immune system may adapt. But why would you date someone who puts a pet ahead of you, requiring you to suffer and take meds to accommodate her pet? In my view, if the relationship with the cat is worth making me miserable, it’s more important to her than me, and if I’m valued below the cat, it’s goodbye. Besides I hate having everything I own covered in cat hair, potentially being used as a scratching post, and the smell of cat p~~~ and s~~~ isn’t perfume to my nose.
I’m sure there are guys who love their cats too. And dogs. And my comments aren’t really applicable to MGTOW, because if you are avoiding relationships with women pets are great company. And your choice of pet isn’t going to be an issue if you aren’t interested in marrying or cohabitating. I have kids living with me – that’s an instant turnoff to a lot of women, and understandably so, but it’s not an issue because I won’t be dating and won’t bring a woman into my home. But it seems to me as soon as you decide to take on a pet you are already choosing that animal – in a woman’s case a furry substitute for a child -over any potential partner that would not want to live with that animal. They have already in a sense chosen the cat over a large number of men in the dating market who are going to see that as an immediate swipe to the left. So how important is a man to these cat ladies anyway? Not as important as their fur babies. And knowing that, any woman who owns a cat is a red flag. It’s an indicator that she isn’t serious about a relationship with a man.
You’re never going to come before a single mother’s kids (understandable), but the same goes for a single woman’s cat. That’s a bitter pill no man should be willing to swallow.

All well explained and understandable. And i agree certain pets would be no-go for me. But you cant make any pet owner face an ultimatum, either me or the pet. You dont abandon pets once you have them, thats a responsibiliy you took on when you bought/adopted them. If a gal said the dog or me, the gal would be gone. If you cant take a person as they are, with what they’ve got, you just dont get involved. Period.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[MonkParticipant 16994]

Verus wrote:

… in a woman’s case a furry substitute for a child …

You often hear neurotic, childless females referring to their pets as ‘my baby’. A couple of days ago, I saw a late twenties female pushing a puppy along in a childs pushchair.

I recall my father saying to me that if they haven’t had child by 30, they go insane.

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10911]

One thing I have noticed is the amount of women who need “emotional support” animals. While I believe these animals do a great deal of good and help a lot of people such as say, soldiers with PTSD, I have noticed that these women prance around with these pets (usually dogs) and the pets are supposed to be vested and identified as emotional support pets. The women with these pets don’t seem to have the proper vests and I am wondering if they really do need them or are they making the claim so they can justify the need to go in every public place possible and take their pet with them. You know, they feel they are special and the rules don’t apply to them. Anyone else notice this?

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Nags4CashParticipant 1163]

I’ve thought about the animal problem a lot. It’s not only cats, but some ladies have 10 cats, 4 dogs, 3 birds, 2 turtles and a partridge in a pear tree. It gets more than a little stupid. There’s a bit of a contradiction in the fact that they even do this and it comes down to one comparison.

Women love animals that must be taken care of by performing work like cleaning up after them and feeding them, paying for their expenses, and showing them affection and being generally friendly, and they do it without complaining. Funny enough, when a cat greedily wants to snuggle at night for it’s own selfish reasons, they’re happy to comply.

Women offer none of that to men without something in exchange. That’s usually money by means of marriage or whatever.

Why are they willing to give all that to animals, but generally speaking, offer nothing to men and instead try to take everything from them. Just to solidify this idea, imagine that you come home from a long day of work to your jobless wife and she starts bitching about things you need to do. She then picks up the cat that you pay to feed and says to it, “how’s my baby kiss kiss kiss”. I’m confident that this has happened to people here, because as far as i can tell it’s pretty common.

I don’t actually have an answer for this nonsensical logic, but it has certainly given me a different view of women that live in such a way. I have some kind of theory that it has to do with animals being unable to talk to them and that they do stupid(cute) things, but i’m still working out the details. Hard for me to gather information on that since i avoid situations where that information is available. At any rate, if a woman will treat an animal better than her man, she’s doesn’t really deserve a man. It’s a shame that most of them seem to prefer animals.

Murph ~ There is nothing brave or manly about entering into a contract with somebody which allows them to take your money, assets, children, and decades of your future income on a mere whim.

[VerusParticipant 965]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Verus wrote:

Just for laughs I have a profile on a dating site. I’m not interested in finding dates, but I like to occasionally check out the dating scene out of curiousity. And for laughs. I’m in my 50s, so I get quite a few desperate women in my age range contacting me to no avail. Something I’ve noticed about the women on dating sites, particularly the older ones – most of them seem to have cats.To me, having a cat would make any woman a non-starter. I have a severe cat allergy. Years ago I dated a woman with a cat, and her callous attitude toward my suffering was one of the reasons I broke up with her. And cat allergies are very common. Cat owners will say that you can always take medicine to control allergy symptoms, and over time your immune system may adapt. But why would you date someone who puts a pet ahead of you, requiring you to suffer and take meds to accommodate her pet? In my view, if the relationship with the cat is worth making me miserable, it’s more important to her than me, and if I’m valued below the cat, it’s goodbye. Besides I hate having everything I own covered in cat hair, potentially being used as a scratching post, and the smell of cat p~~~ and s~~~ isn’t perfume to my nose.I’m sure there are guys who love their cats too. And dogs. And my comments aren’t really applicable to MGTOW, because if you are avoiding relationships with women pets are great company. And your choice of pet isn’t going to be an issue if you aren’t interested in marrying or cohabitating. I have kids living with me – that’s an instant turnoff to a lot of women, and understandably so, but it’s not an issue because I won’t be dating and won’t bring a woman into my home. But it seems to me as soon as you decide to take on a pet you are already choosing that animal – in a woman’s case a furry substitute for a child -over any potential partner that would not want to live with that animal. They have already in a sense chosen the cat over a large number of men in the dating market who are going to see that as an immediate swipe to the left. So how important is a man to these cat ladies anyway? Not as important as their fur babies. And knowing that, any woman who owns a cat is a red flag. It’s an indicator that she isn’t serious about a relationship with a man.You’re never going to come before a single mother’s kids (understandable), but the same goes for a single woman’s cat. That’s a bitter pill no man should be willing to swallow.

All well explained and understandable. And i agree certain pets would be no-go for me. But you cant make any pet owner face an ultimatum, either me or the pet. You dont abandon pets once you have them, thats a responsibiliy you took on when you bought/adopted them. If a gal said the dog or me, the gal would be gone. If you cant take a person as they are, with what they’ve got, you just dont get involved. Period.

Yes, I agree. I would never get as far as even considering such an ultimatum. I’d also never put myself in the position of having a woman make an ultimatum to me – “if you love me, love my cat(s).”

[Handsome VicParticipant 1613]

Origin of the crazy cat lady, good for a laugh:

Crazy Cat Lady

I'm going my own way. Maybe I'll see you there.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Mr. Spock wrote:

One thing I have noticed is the amount of women who need “emotional support” animals. While I believe these animals do a great deal of good and help a lot of people such as say, soldiers with PTSD, I have noticed that these women prance around with these pets (usually dogs) and the pets are supposed to be vested and identified as emotional support pets. The women with these pets don’t seem to have the proper vests and I am wondering if they really do need them or are they making the claim so they can justify the need to go in every public place possible and take their pet with them. You know, they feel they are special and the rules don’t apply to them. Anyone else notice this?

Spot on. And in my city all she has to say is that it is an emotional support animal and it’s against the law to question her.

Order the good wine

[Daryll55Participant 2950]

Nags4Cash wrote:

I’ve thought about the animal problem a lot. It’s not only cats, but some ladies have 10 cats, 4 dogs, 3 birds, 2 turtles and a partridge in a pear tree. It gets more than a little stupid. There’s a bit of a contradiction in the fact that they even do this and it comes down to one comparison.
Women love animals that must be taken care of by performing work like cleaning up after them and feeding them, paying for their expenses, and showing them affection and being generally friendly, and they do it without complaining. Funny enough, when a cat greedily wants to snuggle at night for it’s own selfish reasons, they’re happy to comply.
Women offer none of that to men without something in exchange. That’s usually money by means of marriage or whatever.
Why are they willing to give all that to animals, but generally speaking, offer nothing to men and instead try to take everything from them. Just to solidify this idea, imagine that you come home from a long day of work to your jobless wife and she starts bitching about things you need to do. She then picks up the cat that you pay to feed and says to it, “how’s my baby kiss kiss kiss”. I’m confident that this has happened to people here, because as far as i can tell it’s pretty common.
I don’t actually have an answer for this nonsensical logic, but it has certainly given me a different view of women that live in such a way. I have some kind of theory that it has to do with animals being unable to talk to them and that they do stupid(cute) things, but i’m still working out the details. Hard for me to gather information on that since i avoid situations where that information is available. At any rate, if a woman will treat an animal better than her man, she’s doesn’t really deserve a man. It’s a shame that most of them seem to prefer animals.

It is all about the “ID”
That spirit within a person drives their wants & emotions.

Why would an affluent business person walk by a bum on the street, yet go home to feed their pet gourmet pet food??
Why do Politicians tell you HOW to live * control your life through taxation,yet live a totally different extravagant lifestyle themselves??
Why does the guy right next to you at work get that promotion, even though you are TWICE as qualified for the position??

Women are no different…..
If you have a fat wallet,drive a nice car,and has a penis over 8 inches you are a “10” on their list !

Paradoxically, if a woman has good genes,a knock-out figure, a high IQ, and doesn’t BITCH; a MAN has a “10” too!

Marry again, Hell NO ! ( Even JESUS was hung on a cross just once)

[bladeParticipant]

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[bladeParticipant]

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[Author]

Posts