Candidates Who support Israeli Aggresion

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Here’s a list of Presidential candidates who will speak at the Israeli American Political Action Committee Convention in support of the Israeli fascist policy which has gotten us in so much trouble in the Middle East. Cruz, Kasich, Clinton and Trump. The only candidate who has the b~~~~ not to attend – Sanders. Just passing on the information.

[CaliParticipant 753]

Here’s how I see it: Is Israel oppressing Palestinians? Probably to some degree. Are the Palestinians attacking Israel? Yes. In fact, they are routinely using human shields, to the best of my understanding. Also, they purposefully attack civilian targets on a regular basis. I understand that Israeli forces have caused collateral damage against civilians, but I know for a fact that if you gave the most Palestinians the chance (and most Arabs, for that matter), they would gladly annihilate every Jew they could find, even if those Jews did not participate in any oppression of Arabs.

Besides, it’s not as if the Jewish people have not endured great threats during their time. I personally am certain that the Holocaust happened, but even if it didn’t, that would simply mean that the majority of Jews in Israel are acting and voting on the belief that there have been and still are people who want to see them and their children completely exterminated. In either case, I can see why Israel would be a little uptight about their trigger-happy neighbors.

On top of all this, we already know that there are multiple parties and schools of thought among the Jewish people, as there are among nearly any race or religion. The groups who want to be peaceful would only be strengthened if the terrorist groups attacking Israel disbanded and attempted to achieve victory without violence.

On the other hand, we can be certain that because Israel is superior militarily to the resistance movements, it will prevail in that regard as long as they continue fighting, and that the Israeli parties advocating increased anti-terror and “anti-Palestinian” measures will simply grow in number as long as the violence continues.

I can tell you right now that the surest way to ensure Israel’s collapse would be if the Palestinians became peaceful feminists.
As long as they continue fighting, the Israeli regime will only gain support. I for one am still partially sympathetic to them due to my belief that the Jewish religion is superior to the Islamic religion, but because I am a Christian, I believe I can judge between the two rather fairly…

Just a misogynist virgin hiding away in his mother's basement. Nothing to see here...

[CaliParticipant 753]

Oh! And I almost forgot!

bobphilo wrote:

The only candidate who has the b~~~~ not to attend – Sanders. Just passing on the information.

Even if you are right about your remarks about Israel, I don’t believe I will be heavily disputed if I claim that the surest way to cause AMERICA’s collapse would be if we elected a Socialist as POTUS. By the way, today’s modern liberalism is usually just “Socialism-lite” if you will. The only difference is that hardcore socialists usually don’t give two forks about safe spaces, women’s issues, feminism, or the like once they are in control.

Just a misogynist virgin hiding away in his mother's basement. Nothing to see here...

[Mister Man SmithParticipant 285]

Here’s a point of view from someone that saw how things are done there first hand:

Also, I’d be careful with Sanders if I were you, he basically wants to take away all the money of people that work and give it to people that don’t wanna lift a finger, his promises are laughable at best, free college? Really? Who’s gonna pay for the “free college” unicorns?

Sanders is a communist, now look at communist countries like Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea for example and tell me they’re doing aright.

mistermansmithmgtow.blogspot.com

[Anonymous 24]

Firstly, I do agree 100% about Israel being a facist, agressive, all around douche-bag entity. Most of the American public is unaware of what has/is going on over there, even though their tax dollars fund it. However, just because they are going to speak at the convention, does not mean they all support Israel to the same degree. Clinton would be hands down the most supportive based on her history. The Clintons are easily the most tied to Jewish money, s~~~, even Chelsea married a Jewish billionaire. The Clintons are pro-banking deregulation, pro-media deregulation, pro-corporate, pro-war against those Israel wants destroyed and have oil to be pilfered… The sheer amount of tax dollars our relationship with Israel costs us is absolutely astounding. And this is a very small and very wealthy country…Sanders is a bit of a wildcard to me, I am not so sure what he would try to do about any of it. Trump is the only candidate to say this regarding Israel/Palestine “I would approach it neutrally, how else can you make a deal?” That is far more than can be said for any other candidate. I thought Kasich says he is against wars as well though??? Not that any of what any of them says matters…

In reality I feel Israeli/Jewish influence is so strong behind the scenes that the agenda in the Mid East will continue as planned regardless of who gets elected. Just look at what Obama said in 07 to what he has actually done…

Here is an ex general Wesley Clark being interviewed by Amy Goodman on Democracynow! years ago.

He says that all this s~~~ has been planned for years. Notice the countries he listed and remember this was early in 07 when he said it. It is all about Oil robbery and Israeli interests and keeping the massive Military Industrial complex rolling. The fact is Presidents are puppets for the CIA/Mossad, end of story. Notice how foreign policy never changes no matter the rhetoric by presidential candidates? On the list he just stated we did in fact go on to destroy Libya under I’llbombya, and now we are funding and arming terrorists yet again in Syria. And Iran is in the sights for sure. Russia is the savior of any chance for peace in the region. I really wish Russia would give Iran nukes. Chomsky says that the real reason why Israel/U.S. does not want them to have nukes is because it would be a deterrent in the region. It would stop the rampage through the Mid East that is now going on 15 years of pillaging of countries who attacked NOBODY. S~~~, even the 9/11 guys were ARABS! Yet we won’t be going into Saudi Arabia anytime soon… They are part of the allegiance, they have certainly left their neighbors out to dry. Bush and Obama both should have been impeached for waging wars without congressional approval.

[Anonymous 24]

Mister Man Smith wrote:

Here’s a point of view from someone that saw how things are done there first hand:

Also, I’d be careful with Sanders if I were you, he basically wants to take away all the money of people that work and give it to people that don’t wanna lift a finger, his promises are laughable at best, free college? Really? Who’s gonna pay for the “free college” unicorns?

Sanders is a communist, now look at communist countries like Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea for example and tell me they’re doing aright.

Your link is Jewish funded propaganda and neo-con pro war bulls~~~.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Prager

The first sentence out of that clown’s mouth is a joke. Mainstream media doesn’t even tell the masses s~~~. Israel killed over 2k Palestinians in 2014, Palestinians killed 41 Israelis the same year. Who are the real terrorists? Those who took a country by force many decades ago and still haven’t given the people they conquered citizenship and continually steal their lands, or is it the oppressed who resort to guerilla warfare and “Terrorism”??? Here is the other side of the story that nobody ever gets to hear because Jewish billionaires like Denis Prager own most media outlets. It is the number one most eye opening thing I have ever seen. This is in 7 parts- Watch it people, and tell me if you like your tax dollars going to Israel… We armed fundamentalist rebels and destroyed by air Libya based on accusations of much less violence than Israel has been inflicting upon Palestinians for many decades now.

[Anonymous 24]

Cali wrote:

Here’s how I see it: Is Israel oppressing Palestinians? Probably to some degree.

My guess is you have only been fed half the story your whole life. Watch the documentary I linked and ask yourself why it is never on T.V. …

Also I guess you have no idea on the numbers of Palestinian deaths dating back many decades… It has been a slaughter and a robbery. S~~~ in 2014 Israeli military blew up Palestinian kids on a beach, the survivors scattered, they re-targeted and blew up the ones who ran… True story. A MSNBC reporter had just been playing soccer with the kids and was pulled from the region and was not allowed to tell his story. They of course did not run it on MSNBC or any other mainstream network…

They went on to kill over 2k to 5 losses. That is not a war, that is a slaughter. This has been happening year in year out. Israel keeps having the U.S. block Palestine’s bid for nationhood in the U.N. as well. They do not want a solution, they want to keep killing and stealing all the while yelling TERRORISTS!

[Anonymous 24]

I have been studying this subject for about a decade, and what we have is an example of what happens when a country is run by a religion, or under the guise of a religion. How would any of you feel if the U.S. was invaded by Muslims, and all non Muslims were pushed into one very small corner and not allowed citizenship for 50 odd years and counting? What if they kept stealing your lands and making your corner smaller and smaller??? What if they killed you at a rate of 50 to 1 and cried “TERRORISTS!” all the while they did it? May it push you to one day try to stab one in the streets even if it meant your certain death? There was no radicalism in the Mid East until Zionists took the holy land for themselves…

Zionism was a conspiracy dating back over 100 years. It is one that wanted control of the holy land for Jews. It is a conspiracy that came to fruition…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionism

Here are some incredibly awesome Jews speaking out against Zionism- Take note of what he says about nationalism. Nationalism is a strong attribute of Fascist nations. Let me know when PragerU has guys like this on, I will be sure to tune in if they ever present more than a one sided opinion. Some red pills are harder to get down than others, I would love to provide some of you with a tall glass of water if I could…

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Mister Man Smith wrote:

Here’s a point of view from someone that saw how things are done there first hand:

<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/tN1MkAGuVyY?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

Also, I’d be careful with Sanders if I were you, he basically wants to take away all the money of people that work and give it to people that don’t wanna lift a finger, his promises are laughable at best, free college? Really? Who’s gonna pay for the “free college” unicorns?

Sanders is a communist, now look at communist countries like Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea for example and tell me they’re doing aright.

Where did you get the crazy idea that Sanders is going to take money away from people that work. He is the only candidate that is speaking out against the fact that the top 1% of billionaires are sucking up over 90% of the country’s money from the working class.
He is no communist. Please inform yourself of the difference between communists socialist and social democrats. When FDR introduced Social Security the right wing attacked it as socialist. Maybe you’d like to lose this “socialist” program. When we need protection from crime we pay taxes for a police department instead of making people buy their own security forces. That’s a social program. when you drive on roads paid for by taxes that is a social program. Perhaps you’d like to build your own private highway.
Sanders’ plan for free tuition in state schools would be paid for by taxing the reckless speculation of Wall Street which wrecked our economy. Plus the fact that college graduates earn much more would mean more income in taxes and less money on welfare.
Sanders’ plan for universal health care would actually save workers money. you might pay and extra $500 dollars in taxes but you would save $5ooo in co-pays and deductibles that the fat cat insurance drug companies use to rob people.
There is a big difference between communism, socialism and social democracy. The Soviet Union and Cuba were and are in no way true socialist countries. In socialism the workers control the means of production for the benefit of the working class. In communist countries the workers had no voice in anything. You may not agree with Sanders but there is no way you can call him a communist.
I urge you to learn more about a candidates stance before having a knee jerk reaction to political buzz words.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Joe, you are so right. No country should be run by any religion. That is why we have separation of church and state in this country. Many Israelis claim they have the right to steal the ancestral land of Palestinians because “God gave them this land”. Orthodox Jews once rioted because the government ran public transportation on the Sabbath.
The Palestinians are much like like the early Native Americans who were driven off their lands by the white settlers. Of course it’s too late to give the land back and Israel, like the US, has been their long enough to be allowed to exist, but that does not give it the right to commit genocide on its Arab neighbors with our support.
I do not condone terrorism in any way but we should not be surprised when desperate people resort to desperate means.

[bob__Participant 946]

Raising taxes always benefits the rich people who control the government at the expense of everyone else. Besides those same rich people also control the money printing presses.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

bob__ wrote:

Raising taxes always benefits the rich people who control the government at the expense of everyone else. Besides those same rich people also control the money printing presses.

Oh really? Is that why the super-rich who control the government are so against raising taxes – especially on themselves? They even got a big tax break from Bush. Trump hasn’t had to pay taxes on his billions in years because of tax loopholes. He even stooped giving money to charity because he doesn’t have to lower his taxes. Let the working middle class suckers who worship these billionaires pick up the slack.

[bob__Participant 946]

Donald Trump is poor compared to the owners of the Federal Reserve printing press. They can (and do) print trillions and give it to themselves. Why make billions when you can make trillions?

[UnicronParticipant 752]

I remember seeing a poll from a year ago that stated most politicians would put Israeli interests above the US.

That used to be called treason.

Aren’t Americans embarrassed by how much their ‘elected’ officials grovel and prostrate themselves to Israel?.

Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

bob__ wrote:

Donald Trump is poor compared to the owners of the Federal Reserve printing press. They can (and do) print trillions and give it to themselves. Why make billions when you can make trillions?

Where do you get this information? If the government printed all the money you claim the currency would be virtually useless due to inflation. Besides do you think they are stealing the money hot off the presses at the mint?

[Anonymous 24]

bobphilo wrote:

bob__ wrote:

Donald Trump is poor compared to the owners of the Federal Reserve printing press. They can (and do) print trillions and give it to themselves. Why make billions when you can make trillions?

Where do you get this information? If the government printed all the money you claim the currency would be virtually useless due to inflation. Besides do you think they are stealing the money hot off the presses at the mint?

Fact is, we have no idea about anything when it comes to the “Federal” Reserve central bank. It has never been audited a single time in it’s 103 years of existence. We do know that it is always a Jewish guy in charge of it though.

[bob__Participant 946]

If the government printed all the money you claim the currency would be virtually useless due to inflation.

Gold was $20/oz before the Fed started inflating.

Besides do you think they are stealing the money hot off the presses at the mint?

They don’t have to use an actual printing press. They can just make deposits for any amount they want from the Fed into any bank account they want. The Fed just changes a few numbers on a computer screen and it’s done.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Again, where is your source for this claim? You are providing no evidence. Do you really think that no one would notice with all this money going missing?

[Anonymous 24]

bobphilo wrote:

Again, where is your source for this claim? You are providing no evidence. Do you really think that no one would notice with all this money going missing?

bobphilo wrote:

Again, where is your source for this claim? You are providing no evidence. Do you really think that no one would notice with all this money going missing?

How can it go missing when it was never there? It is just numbers on a computer. Also, the fact that there has never been a single audit in 103 years is all you really need to know. And that is why nobody would notice that anything was “missing”. It is a private central bank, we know nothing. Iceland is the only country to break away from it after the crash in 08. They threw bankers in jail, forgave debts, nobody lost their homes, and sent all the citizens of the country checks after they dismantled the banks. They then nationalized their banking system. Ask yourself this question: Why does the power to create money out of thin air to then lend and profit from exist outside of government oversight? Should’nt interest from government created money that is lent out go to funding the government??? If the Federal Reserve is part of the government why do we owe it money? There should be no deficit if a government controls the money creation/lending.

[Author]

Posts