Can Trump's Election Be Overturned ?

[HitmanParticipant]

i want to ask if this is possible.
i was on a thread where Alex Jones had a guest,
and he was saying Trump’s win will be overturned..
Can hillary’s band of criminals actually do this”
Are the electoral votes already cast or is there time to f~~~ with that ?
help me out ,
i want clarification…
please,
thanks!!!

[Anonymous 54]

Pistol Pete explained it in some ealrier threads on this topic.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

I saw the same thing and Larry/Alex are wrong. The language of the 12th Amendment is clear. But lets game this out. Lets say some of the electors change their votes to the point Trump no longer has 270 or more.

Two things result:
A) Those electors bound by state law to cast their votes a certain way and then change will be prosecuted under the laws of their state–or replaced by alternate electors who will vote as they are required to do —and—or

B) the Election is thrown into the House of Representatives under the provision of the 12th Amendment. Is it possible that the House, controlled by a republican majority could elect Hillary? Yes, but is that a likely ooutcome? No and Hell no.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

The powers that be know this, so why are they pursuing a course they know will fail?

I suspect that they were hoping the “Russians stole it” troupe would gain more traction than it did. They were hoping there would be a public outcry and demand for either new elections to be held, or simply invalidate the election. Both of these are pipe dreams because the process is defined and controlled by the express language of the Constitution and neither course is permissible under the Constitution. So truthfully I don’t get it…They have to know this won’t go anywhere. No maybe they are doing it as mere theater to appease their base on the left, but is that really necessary? Its not likely the hardcore left to stand down and embrace Trump—so what is the point of this turmoil?

The thing I find amazing is how the media et al is unfamiliar with the language of the Constitution, and I wonder why Mr. “Constitutional Professor” Obama hasn’t stepped up and explained this.

Clearly the Globalists are in a panic but what can they do? I’m open to suggestions?

[<<>>Participant 435]

PistolPete wrote:

Clearly the Globalists are in a panic but what can they do? I’m open to suggestions?

^^^ Hits the nail on the head. In order to have New Word Order the Globalist Elite Cabal desperately needs WWIII. Blaming the Russians serves two functions 1) a last ditch effort to dislodge Trump, after slander, poll rigging, and a recount all failed miserably and 2) to further the cause of WWIII with Russia and China. Notice all of Hi_liar_y’s ch(br)est thumping Russian hacking and paranoid rhetoric has now transferred to the left entire. A blue pilled friend of mine was toting the media line a few days before the election “war is inevitable either America’s second civil war or the World’s third”, crazy times my brothers crazy times…

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

OK VOS-GOS you just scared me back to sobriety. Are the Globalists and their lackey Obama et al willing to burn down the world if they can’t have their way? I must concede the possibility, stranger things have happened.

[Anonymous 54]

Never let your gaurd down in life.

[Anonymous 0]

Hitman wrote:

i want to ask if this is possible.
i was on a thread where Alex Jones had a guest,
and he was saying Trump’s win will be overturned..
Can hillary’s band of criminals actually do this”
Are the electoral votes already cast or is there time to f~~~ with that ?
help me out ,
i want clarification…
please,
thanks!!!

No, the election won’t be overturned. The only reason you’re hearing about stuff like this in the news is because the period between the election (early November) and the inauguration (early January) is a slow news cycle. There’s nothing happening in the news. The old president is on his way out, but the new president isn’t in office yet.

The news media operates 24/7, and they have to have news. But there isn’t any news during this period. So the media focus on petty controversies about the people that the new president is appointing, or about the election results. For example, look at the recount effort by Jill Green, the head of the Green Party. Everyone knew that the recount wasn’t going to do anything. Everyone knew it was a total waste of time and money. But the news media made a big deal about it. Why? Because the news media needs news, and that was the only thing happening.

So until the inauguration, expect the news media to turn any little tiny controversial statment by ANYONE into a big controversy. Because until the inauguration, there isn’t s~~~ happening in the news, but the news media still needs the public to read the news and get fired up about it. So the news media MAKES the news.

After the inauguration, you’ll finally start seeing some REAL news, because then some legislation will start coming down from the new administration, and there will be controversy surrounding it. But right now? Forget about it. It’s just made-up news to kill time during the dead zone between the election and the inauguration.

[BlacqueJacqueShellacqueParticipant 6890]

PistolPete wrote:

Clearly the Globalists are in a panic but what can they do? I’m open to suggestions?

Are you familiar with Gerald Celente? He has a quote “When all else fails, they take you to war.” I do not think the power mongers will slip quietly into the night.

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

The Electors of each state will vote for a president and vice president on December 19th. Then Congress officially counts all the electoral votes on January 6th.

Theoretically, some of the electors could change their minds—but that’s highly unlikely considering Trump’s popular vote in most states. I seriously doubt that any of these Electors would be willing to ruin their political careers by voting against their majority.

I really wish Hillary Clinton’s supporters would stop their nonsense and let the process go forward. Yes, she won the popular vote, but her “blue states” didn’t give her enough Electors to represent her and her constituency.

I can sympathize with a person being upset with the election results (Believe me, I’ve had my share of disappointments), but being a sore loser (blocking freeways, smashing store windows) is just immature. It’s time for Hillary Clinton to retire from the world of politics. Lord knows she’s rich enough to forfeit her government pension.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[Anonymous 0]

Anonymous wrote:

No, the election won’t be overturned. The only reason you’re hearing about stuff like this in the news is because the period between the election (early November) and the inauguration (early January) is a slow news cycle. There’s nothing happening in the news. The old president is on his way out, but the new president isn’t in office yet.

Oh, and that business about the Russians is just bluster. If in fact the Russians DID try to meddle in the elections, it will take months and years to work out the facts of the matter, not a couple weeks. They will have to coordinate the results between the various intelligence agencies, there will need to be meetings of committees and subcommittees to work out what kind of a response is needed, etc.

An issue like that has to be worked out to everyone’s satisfaction at the intelligence level, then move on to the discusssions about what kind of policy response is required. All of that takes time. A LOT of time.

Right now, the Russian thing is nothing more than people passing rumors and sniping at each other. It’s just non-news being inflated into news during the dead zone between the election and the inauguration.

*****************

[Added:]

By the way, practically every other country in the world tried to interfere in the US elections as well. At one point during the elections, Canada’s new prime minister Justin Trudeau called a news conference and announced that Trump was an imbecile, or something like that.

In other words, it’s not a big deal for other countries to meddle and have an opinion about which candidate they would prefer. The real question is: Did they actually do something illegal? That’s why the Russian thing would take some time to work out, if it’s even true. Policy-makers would have to work out exactly what the Russians did, whether it was actually illegal, what the intent was, and what kind of policy response is required. And all that takes time.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Canada’s new prime minister Justin Trudeau called a news conference and announced that Trump was an imbecile, or something like that.

Like anyone with any reasonable amount of intelligence actually listens to that camera whore (trudeau).

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Anonymous 0]

Grumpy wrote:

Like anyone with any reasonable amount of intelligence actually listens to that camera whore (trudeau).

Heheh. Agreed.

[<<>>Participant 435]

PistolPete wrote:

OK VOS-GOS you just scared me back to sobriety. Are the Globalists and their lackey Obama et al willing to burn down the world if they can’t have their way? I must concede the possibility, stranger things have happened.

I think we are experiencing quite a novelty in Trump. Everyone laughed, in the beginning then he went completely rogue and started saying things no one in/owned by the establishment would dare to. By the time they came up with a gameplan to redouble their efforts he had already mortified all takers and won the primary. By mid-campaign, they were throwing everything at him and at the end in utter desperation they were throwing everything and square blocks of kitchen sinks. America wanted change and smelled a rat the “doth protest too f~~~ing much” mainstream (globalist owned) media shot itself in both feet with a 12 gauge. WWIII has been a gameplan some would argue since before WWI. It has nothing to do with butthurt Dems even the publicly high ranking NEO-CONs and billionaire shakers think Soros/Rockefeller are draconian yes but still only pawns compared to their puppeteers. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. There is nothing new under the sun and these bastards will stop at nothing to build their Tower of Babble once again. Mark my words…

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

Here’s the problem with the dem’s narrative regarding Russians as I see it. Let’s assume the Russians are guilty of what the dems say, even though there is no proof that I have seen of Russian hackers and certainly no proof they were tied to the Russian government. What are they guilty of? Exposing the DNC emails and corruption? Isn’t that what journalists are supposed to do? The Russian hackers deserve a pullitzer prize for that. Influencing the election? Isn’t influencing an election exactly what lobbyists, mainstream media, alternative media, campaign contributors, intellectuals, celebrities, volunteers, foreign interests, corporations, etc all try to do? So why is Russia guilty of some heinous crime whereas these other groups doing the same thing are not? Could it be that the media is just p~~~ed because they lost the influence game?

It blows my mind how entitled Hillary is. She didn’t lose the election, it was “stolen” from her. It was her presidency so something criminal and nefarious must have robbed her of it. All of this is a distraction from the content of those emails. She must really be afraid of something to continue this sideshow.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Anonymous 22]

Anonymous wrote:

Oh, and that business about the Russians is just bluster. If in fact the Russians DID try to meddle in the elections, it will take months and years to work out the facts of the matter, not a couple weeks. They will have to coordinate the results between the various intelligence agencies, there will need to be meetings of committees and subcommittees to work out what kind of a response is needed, etc.

Just like they immediately ‘knew’ who the people behind 9/11 attacks were, it took no time at all for them to find out that Russia had something to do with the elections.

If they don’t have any proof, they should shut up. The world is watching… AND laughing!

[<<>>Participant 435]

They know they have nothing but they are trying to push and see how far the American people will go. If there were actual evidence and it was being taken seriously then we would have an act of War on the part Russia for undermining our republic at the highest level. Think of this as just the beginning, the globalists are desperate and they will not back down this is ROME 2.0 and the snowball is the size of Everest there is nowhere left to roll.

[HitmanParticipant]

Thanks guys!
I am relieved to read the replies. .I owe you all a beer!!!
Because if Mz.C~~~on is the president I will lose my mind.

[BadgerParticipant 2277]

Huh? What? I didn’t know I was supposed to ask a Russian before I went to vote. Why didn’t someone here tell me?

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Unfortunately, it probably can. the establishment do what they want USA is not a democracy and neither is the UK. They are doing everything they can to stop Brexit and they will succeed sadly. If Trump turns out to be true to his word, which I doubt, then an assasination attempt is probably on the cards. Although I suspect he will just turn out to e an establishment poodle who said things to get votes.

The media brainwashed sheeples will still believe the official story re JFK, 9/11 etc etc

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Author]

Posts