Can economic pressures force women back into their traditional role?

[RomulusParticipant 4667]

SweetDaddyDom420 wrote:

I have a second date tomorrow night with one that claims to be ready to cook, clean, and f***. We will see how it goes. My house is paid for, I live debt free, I have had a vasectomy, and I ain’t getting married. Short of a false rape charge, there isn’t much she could do to me.

Hahahahaha. At first I didn’t get the joke………but now I see you meant to be ironic.

Good one.

How can a woman be expected to be happy with a man who insists on treating her as if she were a perfectly normal human being.

[narwhalParticipant]

SweetDaddyDom420 wrote:

So I wonder, will any of them realize what a great deal they had in the 50s?

Some do, but that does not mean they want the same deal. They will want many of the positives with removal of many the negatives, like have to follow your husbands lead, getting nothing on divorce, that sort of thing. The 50s were the 50s for a reason. You can’t relieve those days without rebuilding that environment, and that’s impossible.

SweetDaddyDom420 wrote:

Will any of them be willing to re-assume the role of mother, wife, sandwich maker, and blowjob giver?

I don’t think wives gave many BJs back then. And I’d say there are plenty that feel like they want that role (minus sandwiches and redefining wife), but they will not give up the ability to exit when they no longer want it.

SweetDaddyDom420 wrote:

Have they finally begun to realize that they can not, and will never make as much as a man, with rare exception?

The realize right now that they do not, but they will never see it as a ‘fault’ within themselves. It’s men’s problem for not treating them equally, and the government for not artificially shifting the scales. They will never need to accept the truth as long as there are tools to manipulate perception.

Ok. Then do it.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Why would any man want to “pressure” (i.e force) a woman into any supposed “traditional role”?
That just reeks of a value/asset/production loss, and unwinnable legal/moral/ethical battles in my mind.
What is in it (meaning what real benefit) for ME as a man?
Why would I want to be responsible for everything again? Especially when she can change at any given moment and still demand and get 50% of my assets at minimum.

When a man reaches adulthood (regardless of age), he is 100% responsible for himself, his actions, his advancement, and his lot in life, and surprisingly also for those around him .
He creates a support, social, and financial network himself, and ends up attracting dependents to himself that he also becomes responsible for.
Most women just assume it all will be there for them to access freely without personal accountability.

How stupid do I have to be to want to do that s~~~ again?

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[The man in the mountainParticipant 4102]

They are already one step ahead of what you said in this post.

The Tradcon women are feeding their flock to try and shack up guys who still believe marriage and co-habitation are still viable options, in this website we have discussed time and time again that they will eventually beg us to go back to the plantation, pretending to be the “good wives” the ones our mothers in some cases probably were, but its all an act because we haven’t seen women simply give up their rights and privileges.

It’s good these whores play pretend and tells us what we want to hear, that they “agree” with us with the men’s issues or marriage, but that boat sailed too late. all they can do now is play pretend and damage control what their other female friends are doing systematically.

[Author]

Posts