Can Anyone Make Sense of This?

Topic by Governor Megachris%

Governor Megachris%

Home Forums Blue Pill Hell Can Anyone Make Sense of This?

Tagged: 

This topic contains 5 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by Skeptisk  Skeptisk 4 years, 3 months ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #132532
    +1
    Governor Megachris%
    Governor Megachris%
    Participant
    3584

    Read this post. It’s regarding Sandman’s most popular video, “Why Women Hate MGTOW.” You have to scroll down quite a ways because his headline is so huge, but the post starts right after the Sandman video. I know most of us aren’t in complete agreement with Sandman on this, but is this guy right in his analysis?

    (This is the same guy that told me calling women land whales wasn’t a nice thing to do after he and I agreed on how horrible women can be. I posted on him a couple of months ago, I think.)

    http://lejacquelope.tumblr.com/post/131902839511/igorbloodscene-lejacquelope-this-video-is

    #132555
    +6

    Anonymous
    42

    The dude is still as blue as a smurf, He’s still in blue mode, Where are these alleged “not toxic” women??? He’s still intoxicated on 197 proof White Knightning, I can smell his foul breath from here! He doesn’t encourage a man to run free and refuse the mental binding and torture that always accompanies the modern relations~~~! Once a MGTOW leaves the plantation he NEVER RETURNS! He works for our adversary, he’s an uncle tom! He’s asking birds to return to the cage! Does that sound like genuine MGTOW advice? My negotiating chair is smashed to pieces! I WILL NOT NEGOTIATE MY FREEDOM! NOT F~~~ING EVER! Let him wear the ball and chain and drag it through his life! My wings will never be clipped! FKN JINA BREATH!!!

    #132561
    +4
    Untamed
    Untamed
    Participant

    The guy can’t see past his nose it’s no wonder he cannot perceive Sandman’s videos as his own and characterises MGTOW from there. It’s obvious he hasn’ t done his homework and is merely comenting on half-ass articles and opinions pretending to have us pegged. Their wildest dreams couldn’t get them close to the reality that is MGTOW. They turn their false notions about us every which way they can to make it fit into some cerebral exercise more destined to put themselves on imagined pedestals than to truly understand what goes on with men these days.
    F~~~ ’em, let ’em ramble on about “Masculinity” all day while I go fishing in the morning, have a business lunch at noon and a no-strings-attached date in the evening.
    MGTOWs do while menginas talk about it.

    Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
    Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
    #GenderSegragationNow!

    #132616
    +1
    K
    Hitman
    Participant

    CRAZY DON’T MAKE NO SENSE !

    #132712
    +4

    Anonymous
    1

    Ok, I shall play devil’s advocate once more, cause reasons. 😀

    I agree with this guys analizis when he says this:

    The idea of reducing women to poverty is so silly and counterproductive it’s hard to imagine this Sandman dude even mastered the concept of self awareness. Why do I say that? Because if this cartoonish plot was even possible, it would mean women coming back to us for their survival. That means FULL. THROATED. HYPERGAMY. By sheer necessity. Thus completely erasing any other benefits he could imagine coming from such an event.

    For me, this is, indeed, what drives me away from women. The fact that the reason they assossiate with men is for resources/utility and nothing more. ENFORCING poverty on women would be severely counter productive.

    HOWEVER, that is the only thing I agree with him.

    Enforcing RESOURCES TRANSFER through the goverment, like the feminits are pushing, or through MARRIAGE like the TradCons wants, is equally detrimental. That is why I don’t trust MRA’s, in the end, their objective is closer to what Sandman described, in keeping women “dependent” to men financially so men work “harder” and women “don’t cheat”.

    As Chagdud Tulku Rinpoche said:
    “If someone needs religion in order to be good, (s)he is not a good person, (s)he is a trained dog”

    That applies to behaviors ENFORCED by law, or necessity. If women needs LAW not to commit DESPICABLE ACTS against men, than they really are lesser than men.

    Give them equal OPPORTUNITY, and let them EARN their money/resources/whatever. They are free to decide their destiny, and we should be free to decide OURS.

    MGTOW needs to focus on freeing men from gender roles imposed upon us by nature and by the men and women around us who are hopelessly indoctrinated by and enslaved to biologically-influenced social conditioning. First and foremost driving this means eliminating the entire concept of defining manhood by arbitrary standards.

    Mgtow doesn’t have to do s~~~! Mgtows need to watch their own backs, and that’s it. Everything else that a man decides to do for his brothers is profit and comendable, but shouldn’t be MANDATORY. Once again, the quote I mentioned previously can also be applied to MEN. You do what is right because you WANT to, not because you are FORCED to. That is how civilization came to fruition, and that’s is why it will fall.

    Instead of defining MGTOW as “avoid all women” we need a reform movement that says “avoid toxic women.”

    Here we have the same NAWALT bulls~~~. Even though I don’t hold high excpectation to women anymore, when I intereact with them I always give them the opportunity to show me if they are, indeed, different. And I always get disapointed. So until I find ONE woman with the MINIMAL standard of decency regarding BOTH sexes, and not just HERS, I will avoid any contact with ALL women beyond the bare minimum.

    Again, Mgtow is not a movement, is more of a phenomena, a philosophy and it doesn’t have to do S~~~ to anyone. You follow if you want to, and if you don’t agree you can go away.

    As an African American man my people suffered this much repression and worse, and we didn’t say “stay away from white people.”

    This is the hive mentality that governs feminism. Since this dude is arguably not a racist, and black, that means that ALL BLACK men are not racist, which is bulls~~~. There are a LOT of black men that are racist. Should I demand from this guy action because of all the black people that are racist? No. Then why should some individuals from Mgtow enforce upon other individuals an acceptance of “all women”. Not your wallet, protector and sperm bank. How each one of us go about this is our own business. If some mgtow, or all mgtow, decides that NO WOMEN are worth that time, it is not anybody else’s job to try to convince them otherwise, except, maybe, the WOMEN THEMSELVES if they wish to assossiate with us. Of course, you take away the pussy power, and not much is left for men that is worth the risk to assossiate with their gender. We are not advocating violence against them, we just are not CARRYING THEM anymore.

    MGTOW could learn from that, rather than continuing along the path of a male separatist group which by the very nature of separatism engenders extremism and hatemongering.

    Here we have a variation of the “man up” argument. We should give women a chance because… reasons. F~~~ off. If assossiating with them gives no benefits and only offers risks, than I will stay the hell away. I don’t have to, neither I want to, become the “sacrificial lamb” for the “greater good”. Being a WHITE KNIGHT is detrimental to men, women and the community. Either women start to learn how to pull their own weights, or they can keep f~~~ing the Gangsters and f~~~ing players. Just don’t expect us to be responsible for THEIR ACTIONS. This is not extremism, this COMMON SENSE and SURVIVAL. He is welcome to carry one of many single mothers and her offsprings, while she bangs the neighbour while he is working his ass off. I am not going to do that.

    Which is to say, MGTOW needs to abandon separatist thinking. We do not need to become like radical feminists.

    We are not. We are not a movement, for starters.

    Feminism wants female “ascention” on the cost of MALE’s labor and lives.

    MGTOW wants Men’s liberation, and ability to keep what we EARNED through OUR OWN WORK. We want to live our lives for ourselves, not sacrificing our lives for women.

    This guy is more than welcome to “do the right thing”, I… will go my own way.

    Cheers.

    #132969
    Skeptisk
    Skeptisk
    Participant
    3679

    Which is to say, MGTOW needs to abandon separatist thinking. We do not need to become like radical feminists.

    Nope. No no no and no!!! MGTOW is defined by self-government; separatism if some want it. So it’s the opposite, to embrace separatism if that is what you want. Separatism isn’t an end-all solution, but one of many strategies one may employ for ones own benefit.

    When it comes to Sandman; if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and look like a duck, it’s probably a duck. In Sandman’s case, he’s just a peculiar MRA business-man making money on creating videos. He uses the MGTOW-label as a brand-name to peddle his products.

    "Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.