Campaign Against Sex Robots

[olderwiserParticipant 65]

They hate it when they see they might lose the control over men. The only thing they can offer will be replaced and they might have to work on themselves and become better people so the fear is real.

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2015-09/15/campaign-against-sex-robots

Life consists of two days, one for you one against you. So when it's for you don't be proud or reckless, and when it's against you be patient, for both days are test for you.

[FrankyParticipant 2338]

Their critical mistake is that they can’t stop us from thinking freely.Men will find a way,
we always have.

[RoyDalParticipant]

I’m still holding out for a Stepford Wife. What I really want is something that will do the chores. The sex, if any, is merely an added plus.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Anonymous 1]

I am starting a campaign!

“Free the SILICONE nipple!”

😀

[RennieParticipant]

As usual out to eliminate all competition again, via unfair/unethical/underhanded tactics. Like clockwork.

[ScandinavianParticipant 590]

I visited the website of this campaign, and noticed a person from my former university was in on this campaign, so I felt compelled to leave a small footprint and see if and how they will meet my ponderings…

http://www.use.com/DV4f4

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

Anonymous wrote:

I am starting a campaign!
“Free the SILICONE nipple!”

LOL.

Of course, the normalisation of dildos, vibrators etc from grubby back alley sexy shops to every woman’s dresser drawer was empowering. And yet, if men suggest exactly the same thing…

[hmskl’dParticipant 6405]

The human women obviously feel they simply can’t compete with the androids. Their flight or fight response is to attempt to ban them.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

people generally get what they want. you can make drugs, alcohol, prostitution, gambling, etc illegal but people are still going to do it. they will always find a way. there is way too much money in sex robots. no std’s, no pregnancy, no pressure, complete privacy, won’t get fat, no drama, no false rape accusations, no false DV accusations, no “reverse” DV, no psychological abuse (feminists will still abuse though), cheaper in the long run, no divorce, no dating, and on and on. they won’t complain about “male” sex robots for women though because women are incorruptible.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[ChristovParticipant 85]

Scandinavian wrote:

I visited the website of this campaign, and noticed a person from my former university was in on this campaign, so I felt compelled to leave a small footprint and see if and how they will meet my ponderings…
http://www.use.com/DV4f4

That was a damning statement. I wonder if they’ll hear it?

[DDJParticipant 1880]

We should start an anti- dildo petition on the White House page,

Every woman is a slut, if you catch her on the right day.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Some people have WAY too much free time.

[binlinerParticipant 32]

And here’s what Feminist Hitler wants to do about sexbots:

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

Having actually had time to read the Wired article, I can’t help but remember that the Vatican made all the same arguments about IVF and artificial reproductive technologies.

Feminists screamed “RAAAAAAAAAAAAAPE!” and threatened to abort a child every 30 seconds* until they got their way.

Now it’s men, well, obviously that’s different. Because PATRIARCHY.

(* may not have happened).

[TheBardParticipant 974]

“A campaign has called for an outright ban on robots developed for sex. Leading academics in robot ethics have warned that their creation will only increase the objectification of women and children, further dehumanising those who are abused for sex.”

This makes no sense. Men are going to sex robots because they are tired of real women and their s~~~. What man is going to say “you know because I have sex with this robot that makes all real women objects too”. And why even bring up children? What does having sex with robots have to do with children? Leave it to women to have sick thoughts in order to protect themselves.

“I propose that extending relations of prostitution into machines is neither ethical, nor is it safe,” she argued. “If anything the development of sex robots will further reinforce relations of power that do not recognise both parties as human subjects. Only the buyer of sex is recognised as a subject, the seller of sex (and by virtue the sex-robot) is merely a thing to have sex with.”

That is because the buyer is the subject and the seller the object. A prostitute is merely a thing you are paying to have sex with. And women wonder why not many of them are in charge lol. I have to say though I do worry about AI getting to smart though. I would be fine just using those sex dolls that look real over robots.

[TransactionaryParticipant 45]

What’s next? The ban on pocket pussies?

[ScandinavianParticipant 590]

Christov wrote:

Scandinavian wrote:

I visited the website of this campaign, and noticed a person from my former university was in on this campaign, so I felt compelled to leave a small footprint and see if and how they will meet my ponderings…http://www.use.com/DV4f4

That was a damning statement. I wonder if they’ll hear it?

I doubt they will even let it through censorship, or maybe they will focus on the technology today not what it may lead to. Because truth be told; this is what they fear, not what we have today, where robots are ugly, mechanical and cold, a woman can still compete with that and be successful. But what if this evolve and the robot gets a warmer, more natural feel to it, can carry more than just a few word conversation (as in maybe discussing current events in the world together, or showing what would appear to be human emotions)? Then the woman would ultimately lose to the robot/android, and that is what they are scared s~~~less of! Therefore this is just an attempt to stop developement in it’s cradle.

As for my arguments, I’ve suffered through approximately 15 points of feminist rhetorics at uni and I know that what these future robots can supply is plenty enough to give the feminists their claimed Utopia; a world in which men and women can live side by side without infesting on eachother, without power struggle. But obviously their original words does not correspond with their actions. My intention is to get them to admit they are traditionalists, wanting women to live upon The efforts of man like a parasite, just like they did since the dawn of time. And when they do, I will run them over with the ‘official politically correct bulldozer of sexist oppression’©!

[Author]

Posts