California actually passed the law mandating women on corporate boards.

[Ja[H]xParticipant 193]

I s~~~ you not.

I posted about this a few months ago. I guess I’m not red pilled enough because I thought it was a publicity grab.

~Insert witty comment here~

[StealthParticipant 5352]

“Having more women on boards will make companies more successful, said state Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, who authored the bill, SB 826.

“Women tend to be more collaborative and are better at multitasking, the Santa Barbara Democrat said. She believes having more women in power also could help reduce sexual assault and harassment in the workplace.”

Wow.

– Claiming cognitive superiority by a race of beings.
– Have you ever worked with a woman? Are they more collaborative? Better organized? Even if they were, that’s still no reason to impose this new rule. Nor would it mean the specific individuals appointed to a board embodied these traits. I could go much further on this point.
-Women create sexual harrassment, not prevent it. Let’s also not forget #Metoo is a passing facebook fad. Is it even ten months old?

And…
– Imposing this blanket adoption by law.

The new law sounds like a new low.
Corporations organize themselves based on what is good for business, and the market. They don’t need the government assigning their leadership for them.
These quotes make the creator if the law sound quite bubble headed.

"Once you’ve taken care of the basics, there’s very little in this world for which your life is worth deferring." -David Hansson. "It’s not when women are mean or nasty that anything is out of the ordinary. It’s when they are NICE to you that you have to be on high alert..." -Jackinov.

[Nags4CashParticipant 1163]

it says fined 100k for first violation and 300k for afterwards. Depending on the frequency of the fines and the size of the company, they might just choose to take the violations.

Murph ~ There is nothing brave or manly about entering into a contract with somebody which allows them to take your money, assets, children, and decades of your future income on a mere whim.

[StealthParticipant 5352]

“A fourth of publicly held corporations with headquarters in California don’t have any women on their boards of directors. These companies have not done enough to increase the number of women on their boards despite the Legislature’s urging, making government intervention necessary, Jackson said.”

A flawed view of the role of government, IMO. The private sector doesn’t do what the government (lobbyists) want, so they force it by law. I mean, that is why laws exist… but something like this? The governor acknowledged there are problems with this new law.

The motivation/goal…..
Ready?
“This is one of the last bastions of total male domination,” she said. “We know that the public and business are not being well-served by this level of discrimination.”

They simply want to take over. Bust up the boys. Divide and conquor.

I’m being red-pilled by the second too, JaHx.

"Once you’ve taken care of the basics, there’s very little in this world for which your life is worth deferring." -David Hansson. "It’s not when women are mean or nasty that anything is out of the ordinary. It’s when they are NICE to you that you have to be on high alert..." -Jackinov.

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10911]

Multitasking? Anyone can start dozens of projects at the same time, finishing them successfully is another story. Well when all the companies move out of California, that will be the last nail in the coffin for the Golden State.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

As if California wasn’t bleeding out on businesses enough already.

I only expect to see more companies bail out of the state after this.

That economy is going to be completely hollowed out soon.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

………….“Women tend to be more collaborative and are better at multitasking, the Santa Barbara Democrat said. She believes having more women in power also could help reduce sexual assault and harassment in the workplace.”

F~~~ing up 10 things simultaneously is not my definition of multitasking.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[MorpheusParticipant 2177]

$100000 fine is over how many period? Better to give a fine than to give an equal amount of salary to some useless member.

Upon reading the article, they need 3 not just 1 woman on board by 2021. What a joke.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22555]

Morpheus wrote:

Upon reading the article, they need 3 not just 1 woman on board by 2021. What a joke.

If one thinks about it, this law is the ultimate betabux cuck law. Instead of passing a law where government places government appointed individuals on a company’s board of directors, like the variation of this concept being done in China, the cucks in the California state government pass a law to given unnamed women, not directly connected to the state government, to be appointed to a company’s board of directors.

In other words, instead of creating a law to give power to themselves, the those in the California state government pass a law to give power to female strangers.

[SESQUI ano estParticipant 2535]

Disgusting. Why would you deliberately hamstring businesses like this. Oh wait, it doesn’t have to make sense just as long as we give women free s~~~.

Everyday above ground is a good one. Everyday above ground while single...better still.

[AutoliteParticipant]

I don’t understand how this can even be legal?

Canadian Feminists in Alberta have been pushing for the same thing. They wanted the large oil companies to be forced to hire more women as senior executives or suffer tax penalties.

It’s interesting that there was no mention of more women needed to be hired as ditch diggers or rig pigs…

[NerdTunnelerParticipant]

People on the board should bring something of value to the company. Just having a vagina does not cut it…

But if that is what they want, then its a good experiment to see again that socialism “works”…/s

I am looking forward to the number of businesses that fails or move to other places because of that law…Dont they know that a lot of people are working very hard to compete and earn a chair on the board only to be robbed of that chair not because of skill but because of vagina…

Equal opportunity my ass…I am going to enjoy the s~~~show that is going to happen…but then again…I dont give a f~~~ when I have challenges of my own to conquer that would better my life…

I stand with feet apart and let my balls hang free...Manginas dont have balls...See how they stand and sit at the whim of their masters...

[AutoliteParticipant]

So what are the gender identity rules in California? What’s to stop a male board member from legally self identifying as a woman???

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

This will never stand up in court. Nothing more than grandstanding by politicians, who fully know this will get shot down eventually. Because it looks like they did something for there lemmings, it’s a perceived win for those dummies.

Sovereignty above all else.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22540]

Ja[H]x wrote:

I s~~~ you not.
I posted about this a few months ago. I guess I’m not red pilled enough because I thought it was a publicity grab.

I sense that a new position will b created on company boards. “Board Concierge Manager.”

Well, shes on the board, nothing they can do about it. ILL TAKE A COKE, THANKS.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Knights Templar Rising wrote:

This will never stand up in court. Nothing more than grandstanding by politicians, who fully know this will get shot down eventually. Because it looks like they did something for there lemmings, it’s a perceived win for those dummies.

I hope you’re right! It’s so f~~~ing ridiculous that it’s surreal. You can’t determine an individual’s productivity based on their gender. That’s blatant discrimination. How is it that the governor even signed this???

[D.B.D.Participant 889]

Dinan Engineering moved from California to Alabama earlier this year…for some reason. Hmm.

[MorpheusParticipant 2177]

Missed one more detail, it is only for publicly traded companies. These companies do have enough money to pay the fines. If you decide to pay the dues, it will really create bad reputation leading to decrease in stock prices.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

I sense that a new position will b created on company boards. “Board Concierge Manager.”
Well, shes on the board, nothing they can do about it. ILL TAKE A COKE, THANKS.

I was thinking the same thing. Like women in the military. They’re there to simply fill a slot with no real responsibilities. Their male counterparts and subordinates will actually do all the work…

[SH3LLZParticipant 5569]

Utter bulls~~~. If I had a company in CA with this kind of mandate, my corporate HQ would be situated OUT OF STATE. Hell the science has already shown that “multitasking” is utter crap and makes you LESS effective. now their praising it as a virtue in women??? DAFUQ is the world coming to???

#ICETHEMOUT!!! #MANOUT!!! #HIDEYOURWEALTH #VAGINAISWORTHLESS

[Author]

Posts