Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › C4 call in security following Peterson debate
Tagged: Jordan Peterson
This topic contains 21 replies, has 14 voices, and was last updated by Ranger One 2 years ago.
- AuthorPosts
Following the interview discussed here:
Channel 4 have apparently called in security protection for Cathy Newman following abuse and threats against her.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5291581/Channel-4-gets-security-Cathy-Newman-abuse.htmlSurely a sign of the times that my thought process was:
“Why the hell would anyone need to make threats against her? Peterson already comprehensively destroyed her position during the debate, surely such threats just serve to make a martyr out of her and distract from… oh, of course”Such transparent bulls~~~, but the sheep as always will lap it all up.
Timely I literally just watched this interview every minute of it.
She was beyond transparent with her method of questioning him and demonstrated an unwillingness to separate his direct and unemotional presentation of facts and research from her obvious agenda Weakly refuting his answers supported by emotions.
He completely got her at the end, that hamster wheel spun so fast it was sending smoke signals to eject.
Putting being female aside, she demonstrated that as a journalist she does not operate professionally, to possess the ability to approach a subject rationally, unemotionally, or impartially.
We are the awakened. We are MGTOW
I wouldn’t be surprised if the “threats” are an inside job to make red pill men look “dangerous”. Take a look at how dishonest the media is. Could be wrong, but you never know when we’re talking about the corrupt media.
http://register-her.net/web/guest/home
I watched that debate. He ate her lunch and left her with the dishes.
I have been looking at different sites to get their take on the interview and apparently not one commenter on any site has yet to see any threat posted, anywhere. Lots of criticism and the usual troll crap calling her a bitch etc. but that is not the same as a threat. Looks like Channel 4 may want to be deflecting the conversation away from “our presenter Cathy Newman is an incompetent interviewer” to “Cathy Newman is a victim”
Anonymous0They are using REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY to make men look DANGEROUS!
This is how they MANUFACTURE their VICTIMHOOD.
Using FALSE FLAG ATTACKS to gain public support.They are using REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY to make men look DANGEROUS!
This is how they MANUFACTURE their VICTIMHOOD.
Using FALSE FLAG ATTACKS to gain public support.Bingo !
http://register-her.net/web/guest/home
Here are the horrible f~~~ing s~~~ people have been saying about this c~~~ as quoted in the article. And if you listen to the interview, she’s really is a ball breaking f~~~ing idiot.
Twitter trolls had called Newman a ‘c***’, a ‘b****’, a ‘f***ing idiot’ and said she was ‘not attractive to look at’.
F~~~ing slag.
Notice the job opportunity boys. Internet security risk assessment is a profession according to the article.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
There seems to be widespread reaction to this interview right across society judging by the reaction posted on many websites correctly identifying that newman came across as an bombastic feminist ideologue and not a journalist and that peterson calmy won the debate by conversing politely and rationally in comparison to newman.
Its pretty obvious the security risk story is an double down attempt to turn newman into a victim and distract from peterson clearly winning the socalled interview.
Regardless of whether i agree with all petersons points its refreshing to see feminist bulls~~~ being exposed on live TV.
Feminism was funded by bankers/politicians to create more taxpayers. MGTOW IS FREEDOM https://archive.org/details/mgtowisfreedomblurayready
She is a victim. She was mansplained in a clear sign of misogyny by Peterson right in front of every one on tv.
She has her “lived life” reality and there is no excuse for him to use the patriarchal rules of logic and reason to alienate this women’s views.
Via her ownership of a vagina, her opinions are just as valid as Peterson’s and add to the discussion by bringing in the female point of view.
-Brought you you by N.O.W. the organization that will f~~~ your government, boss and husband for you.
A must have for a modern woman.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
Anonymous42He completely got her at the end, that hamster wheel spun so fast it was sending smoke signals to eject.
I knew I smelled burning hair!
Any guy ever wanting to “FIX” the problem.. Just watch this. And you will see what the solution really is.
I really hate to be the one to say this, But I have this really bad suspension that all these women are going to look at some very hard lives in the future. What I mean by that, I think you know what I mean.
You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home
Given the BBC’s behavior towards this site, those “threats” made against Cathy Newman were nothing but a false flag action by the BBC intended to divert attention away from the fact that she got her ass handed to her by Dr. Peterson.
Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.
The interview was on Channel 4 not the BBC.
http://www.leavemeansleave.eu
The interview was on Channel 4 not the BBC.
Channel 4, BBC, it’s all Fake News Britain…
And calling somebody a bitch isn’t a threat, but an assessment of a person. Besides, threats are useless, so I think the MSM needs to work more on their false-flag operation to be more credible. It’s all lies, of course, like that muslim c~~~ in Canada.
"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain
The interview was on Channel 4 not the BBC.
That’s like saying ABC and ESPN are different.
I’m surprised that a rabid conspiracy theorist like yourself doesn’t perceive BBC1, BBC2, and Channel 4 as different fingers on the same glove.
Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.
’m surprised that a rabid conspiracy theorist like yourself doesn’t perceive BBC1, BBC2, and Channel 4 as different fingers on the same glove.
I do.
http://www.leavemeansleave.eu
’m surprised that a rabid conspiracy theorist like yourself doesn’t perceive BBC1, BBC2, and Channel 4 as different fingers on the same glove.
I do.
The BBC is actually a governmnet department although they try to disguise it.
Technically Channel 4 is independent as is ITV, Channel 5 etc
http://www.leavemeansleave.eu
That’s like saying ABC and ESPN are different.
No, I was just pointing out you were factually incorrect about which channel it was.
http://www.leavemeansleave.eu
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678