Bud Light Forced to Remove Label

[Governor Megachris%Participant 3584]

Apparently, Bud Light made controversy recently for having a label that said “The perfect beer for removing ‘no’ from your vocabulary for the night.”  It was SUPPOSED to mean “go and have fun, party, whatever”, but feminists and white knight men everywhere shamed the company with their stupid Twitter hashtags like “#NOMEANSNO” and such.

Here’s the link.  Laugh away, gentlemen.

[ExsliventxsParticipant 1067]

Haha that’s hilarious. Now even the word no is being censored. F~~~ these t~~~s are out of their minds.

Sadly, every chick I’ve ever met that drinks Bud light at parties is incredibly easy.

Everyone know feminazis don’t drink Bud light, they drink blue pill man tears and blood.

Rapist:: oh … no means no? Holy s~~~… I never knew this… I thought it meant yes.. wow.. all this time.. I just.. I just… I’m a bad dood…Damn…. —

*Muffled cries from woman tied to bed and gagged*

— Shutup bitch I’m trying to think here… I’ll finish with you in a second.  Man.. I’m just– oh well I’m in too deep now, just like I’m about to be in you. Giggity…

— SAID NO RAPIST EVER. 

These women are f~~~ing stupid.

[hankmoodyforuParticipant 16]

Lol that is crazy. Feminist are some bitches over a damn label.

your tears of regret cannot turn back the hands of time!

[KeymasterKeymaster]

You know, I am really looking forward the day when a feminist c~~~ tries to get away with that s~~~… telling me I can’t wear a shirt because it has pics of chicks on it, or asking me to “apologize” for … anything. The poor girl will be f~~~ing toast and left to stand there in her own puddle of tears and pussy juice. I hope there will be many witnesses.

A couple of days ago, we shamed “Abercrombie & Fitch” for cow-towing to feminists with their new “Abercrombie and Fat Bitch™” company image change… just to appeal and appease 10,000 of the ugliest bitches on Earth.

http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/abercrombie-reverses-course-welcomes-ugly-humans-with-open-arms/

Let’s just say, they were not impressed.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[experiencedParticipant]

Intentional, they knew it’d stormshower publicity. Besides it actually lets the whores de’ euvres know exactly what it does, and has Bud covered legally.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Governor Megachris%Participant 3584]

@keymaster – Seriously?  I never saw that before!  What a shame, really.  I’m not a huge fan of really any big name clothing brands besides a few that I find to be very comfortable, but knowing that A&F is basically giving into the feminists’ demands is one more reason I won’t shop there.  I already saw it as the perfect store to expose women, as they loved going in those places to get the bags with all the “hawt” guys on it.

I wonder what’s next, will Victoria’s Secret begin using models from Lane Bryant because they want to promote “body positivity?”

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

I thought it’s now ‘yes means yes’ not ‘no means no’.

So are we saying that fembots mean ‘yes means no & no means yes?’

Is that right please ….. yes or no?

[Anonymous 25]

well I say ‘no’ to listening to their whinging or any woman come within 10 feet of me unless I have given her express permission.

No means no so respect that women

[jack reacherParticipant 751]

Yes, today’s strong, empowered and capable womyn are absolutely destroyed, f~~~ing emotionally ruined by an ad campaign that suggests you could have a good time with beer. I am fully confident now these same bitches are able to handle high stress government, military, corporate and scientific positions.

These f~~~ing t~~~s ARE the rape culture and AB caved. Well it is a s~~~ beer anyway.

[– Deleted on Request –Spectator 936]

Feminists have been complaining about beer ads as far back at the Swedish Bikini Team campaign of a generation ago.  Then again, it doesn’t really bother me as I make my own brew and I can guarantee you that it tastes much better than Bud!

 

[MadScientistParticipant 131]

I just called someone out on this in Facebook, and despite me being very, very clear that I thought Rape was a vile crime, I thought that overusing the word Rape in situations where someone was not violently raped would water down the word, and cause violent rape to get less attention, and I was not in favor of that because I hate Rape so much.

Surprise! Apparently what I was saying ‘sickened’ them and such and so forth. And they provided scenarios which might be considered rape, so I provided ones that wouldn’t be, and would still be legally considered rape on just the word of a woman. I was arguing in their favor, made very clear, and of course..

Nope. Because I think differently than they do, somehow what I was saying was condoning rape culture.

Gotta love that … .logic.

PS: Anyone have a copy of that Sexual Consent form? 🙂

[MadScientistParticipant 131]

I forgot to mention, they equated, for example. “If someone agrees to hands and vagina but not anal, and then gets it put in her anus, that THAT is rape.” I mean, can’t you say no? Or I dont know.. ‘stop’? How the hell is it rape? It adheres to the STRICTEST definition of Rape via websters, but seriously? A guy gets all hot and bothered, loses control for 2 minutes and puts it in the wrong hole and BAM.. he goes to jail?

I cannot even begin to understand how they do not get this.. that this will hurt them, and their standing in society.

*sigh*

I suppose expecting even rudimentary logic from women is pretty stupid.

[Anonymous 11]

Stupid seems to be the general rule these days. I think Abercrombie and Fitch should start selling clothes that can double as circus tents otherwise they just might offend some sorry land whale that’ll need to be buried in a 53 foot shipping container box.

With women “No” does not always mean “No”, and that is a known fact. Again, they’re having it both ways.

[Author]

Posts