Briffault's Law

[Anonymous 12]

I had never heard about this man before but I and I am sure all of us know his philosophy on women, probably from personal experience.

Briffault’s law maintains that “the female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.” Today we would say “relationship” rather than “association.”

An interesting article. I am amazed it got published.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/au/blog/machiavellians-gulling-the-rubes/201610/briffaults-law-women-rule

[MACHOParticipant]

Funny how silly how this has been interpreted!

Was obviously written by a Blue pill individual that got brainwashed! A woman that seeks a specific man to mate with can get rejected the same way as a man seeking a female of his liking! This is bulls~~~!! Obsolete !! There’s an old saying that goes something like this … Men propose women dispose! I have had probably over 10 average women in the last couple years who tried to mate with me (have sex to be Very clear) And I cleverly dismissed each and every one of them! Bulls~~~!

We already know, of course, that women wield the ultimate veto power in the mating game. It is women who give thumbs-up or thumbs-down to any advances or proposals from men.

You must own a better Crystal ball than I

[AwakenedParticipant 35200]

LOTS of things have changed about Women since this was written EXCEPT THEIR NATURE.

Briffault’s Law has Always been in existence, he was just the first to actually name it.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[MACHOParticipant]

Awakened wrote:

LOTS of things have changed about Women since this was written EXCEPT THEIR NATURE.

Briffault’s Law has Always been in existence, he was just the first to actually name it

Men were simply too soft brother!! I was born with a Solid character, even as a teenager girls couldn’t make me do s~~~! Sure my hormones were off the charts but my mind kept my dick in my pants! Today I stand even more solid than ever.. I had No children from my only marriage since I married when I turned 41! Caught my wife cheating after 2 yrs in such aggravated circumstances that she offered No resistance whatsoever in court! Lesson learned!

You must own a better Crystal ball than I

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22506]

MACHO wrote:

Funny how silly how this has been interpreted!
Was obviously written by a Blue pill individual that got brainwashed! A woman that seeks a specific man to mate with can get rejected the same way as a man seeking a female of his liking! This is bulls~~~!! Obsolete !! There’s an old saying that goes something like this … Men propose women dispose! I have had probably over 10 average women in the last couple years who tried to mate with me (have sex to be Very clear) And I cleverly dismissed each and every one of them! Bulls~~~!

We already know, of course, that women wield the ultimate veto power in the mating game. It is women who give thumbs-up or thumbs-down to any advances or proposals from men.

They read too much into briffaults law, thats why you correctly call it bulls~~~.

The law is, women do not associate with men they cant easily get some form of value or utility from. It covers all male/female associations, sexual or not. Briffaults law is why office flirting from a sexy guy is wonderful and whynthey call human resources when a guy they arent interested does the very same thing.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[AwakenedParticipant 35200]

MACHO wrote:

A woman that seeks a specific man to mate with can get rejected the same way as a man seeking a female of his liking! This is bulls~~~!! Obsolete !!

A Woman can get rejected just like a man can get rejected, but a Woman can EASILY find another man that WON’T reject her.

MACHO wrote:

I have had probably over 10 average women in the last couple years who tried to mate with me (have sex to be Very clear) And I cleverly dismissed each and every one of them

And, they each went out and found another Man probably rather easily. You were just going to be there “next”, and maybe a baby day as well, but if not you then it’s “next”, and the beat goes on.

MACHO wrote:

Men were simply too soft brother!!

MOST Men are simply too BLUE !!

MACHO wrote:

I was born with a Solid character, even as a teenager girls couldn’t make me do s~~~! Sure my hormones were off the charts but my mind kept my dick in my pants!

You have ALWAYS been an exception to the “rule”

MACHO wrote:

Today I stand even more solid than ever..

Today, you stand a lil Redder Every Day !!

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[MACHOParticipant]

Awakened wrote:

A Woman can get rejected just like a man can get rejected, but a Woman can EASILY find another man that WON’T reject her.

YOU are Right that most men are way too blue! but being the exception, this allowed me in my life to have the woman of my choice. But AWALT!! alas They all sooner or later go flaky, berserk or 9-1-1 on men! So I doubt that I will ever consider one again. But… they don’t know it… Some probably think that I’m playing hard to get… which is the perfect place to have them.

You must own a better Crystal ball than I

[Anonymous 12]

MACHO wrote:

Funny how silly how this has been interpreted!
Was obviously written by a Blue pill individual that got brainwashed! A woman that seeks a specific man to mate with can get rejected the same way as a man seeking a female of his liking! This is bulls~~~!! Obsolete !! There’s an old saying that goes something like this … Men propose women dispose! I have had probably over 10 average women in the last couple years who tried to mate with me (have sex to be Very clear) And I cleverly dismissed each and every one of them! Bulls~~~!

We already know, of course, that women wield the ultimate veto power in the mating game. It is women who give thumbs-up or thumbs-down to any advances or proposals from men.

I would say that for a very long time the game was somewhat fair or fairer. Men and Women each played their part and as such men would be blue pill because it worked for the majority of them.

The game has changed now though. Men, especially Red Pill ones withhold resources, interest etc many avoid women altogether. Even some Blue Pill men will only engage on terms that suit them.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

The game has changed the women have changed the laws, and use the media to promote their agenda. The media crafts the story to look like men are the aggressive animals with out the part of women making the event. This used by the political class to make more laws.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22506]

If women run the world why women blame men for everything? Or need special proteted class status?

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[bstoffParticipant 4863]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

If women run the world why women blame men for everything? Or need special proteted class status?

Because they can and because they WANT it, not need it.
That proves that they actually do run the world.

[Anonymous 2]

Somes up every relationship I’ve ever had with a female. If they can gain from you i.e.; emotional, monetary, possessions. They will drop you like you don’t exist. It doesn’t matter what you did for her in the past. It’s about her right now! That’s why they cheat and give you the line “he made me feel good”. The chad didn’t give her a house car phone kids and food in her gut. It was an emotional feeling of being courted by some f~~~er that made her panties wet. A mans blood sweat tears and devotion didn’t mean s~~~. F~~~ them and their nature.

[Anonymous 12]

Anonymous wrote:

Somes up every relationship I’ve ever had with a female. If they can gain from you i.e.; emotional, monetary, possessions. They will drop you like you don’t exist. It doesn’t matter what you did for her in the past. It’s about her right now! That’s why they cheat and give you the line “he made me feel good”. The chad didn’t give her a house car phone kids and food in her gut. It was an emotional feeling of being courted by some f~~~er that made her panties wet. A mans blood sweat tears and devotion didn’t mean s~~~. F~~~ them and their nature.

Even before I ever had a relationship I knew on some level that it is how it worked. It basically comes down to a willingness to be exploited in some way. A willingness to put yourself second. I was even with a woman who criticized me because I wasn’t willing to bow down to her!

[Anonymous 1]

Anonymous wrote:

An interesting article. I am amazed it got published.

It got published in an era when First Wave Feminism was just getting a foot hold. It would never get published today.

Notice its called Briffault’s Law not Briffault’s Hypothesis. This is because all his scientific peers recognized the absolute truth in his observations and conclusions. This is absolutely true of female behavior all the way from Tribal Society to Civilization.

[AwakenedParticipant 35200]

MACHO wrote:

Awakened wrote:

A Woman can get rejected just like a man can get rejected, but a Woman can EASILY find another man that WON’T reject her.

YOU are Right that most men are way too blue! but being the exception, this allowed me in my life to have the woman of my choice. But AWALT!! alas They all sooner or later go flaky, berserk or 9-1-1 on men! So I doubt that I will ever consider one again. But… they don’t know it… Some probably think that I’m playing hard to get… which is the perfect place to have them.

Isn’t the Red Pill Grand ??

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Buller100Participant 2189]

Thanks to this site I read the Law before , the nature is worse back then they almost had no choice , now the do so their nature is there for all to see…

[Author]

Posts