Breitbart Covers the War on Men

[jack reacherParticipant 751]

Article on the War on Men from Breitbart, we will see how much traction it gets. I like Breitbart because it is self consciously anti-left wing/liberal.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/10/the-war-on-men-males-bear-brunt-of-global-violence/

Some of it I agree with, some not so much, but good to see the story covered and some discussion.

[Anonymous 3]

I like some of Breitbart, and it used to be pretty good, but now they’ve sold out and gone hilariously super right wing. I use drudge and the breitbart articles lately all seem to be about Pamela Gellar and her brand of attention whoring idiocy. Instead of calling out the government, bankers and feminists, it seems like breitbart and its readers are now more interested in just complaining about Muslims and making racist remarks towards several races.

 

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

I like the guy who pointed out the inherent culture of male disposability.  I’m seriously thinking about making up a bumper sticker that says “Men are not disposable.”  Not sure that even the MEN in Seattle would get it.

 

 

 

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Anonymous 12]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

I like the guy who pointed out the inherent culture of male disposability. I’m seriously thinking about making up a bumper sticker that says “Men are not disposable.” Not sure that even the MEN in Seattle would get it.

Male lives matter too?

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Check this out from the Economist article cited in the primary:

 

In popular films fewer than a third of the characters who speak are women, and more than three-quarters of the protagonists are men. Yet the fact that the highest rungs have male feet all over them is scant comfort for the men at the bottom.

Thank Christ somebody said it. It is a HUGE sore point for me that because a few males dominate the institutions of economic and political power that that somehow justifies any and all things done to put the rest of males at a disadvantage. Just sickening.

However bad women think they have it from the males “at the top,” they seem completely incapable of realizing that the males on the lower end of the totem pole have every bit as bad or worse.

Pay gap my ass. You’re paid exactly what you’re productivity is worth to your employer.  The true test of whether or not you’re underpaid in a free market economy is whether or not someone else is willing to pay you more.  In which case of course, you should accept their offer.

 

 

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[jack reacherParticipant 751]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

However bad women think they have it from the males “at the top,” they seem completely incapable of realizing that the males on the lower end of the totem pole have every bit as bad or worse.

We in the west live in a culture that demonizes wealth of that 1-5% if a man is making it, but calls for pussy pass quotas to get women that wealth. Women in the west have it better than most males on the planet. They have access to the highest levels of income, education, health care, political pandering, legal system pandering, that most males on the planet could not even dream about. Yet these continues will continue to whine until they are just screaming at each other, continually demanding someone acknowledge their special presence. Because nothing says structural patriarchal oppression like the ability to manufacture rape stats and have the white house parrot them, inventing false pay gaps stats and having the white house and media parrot that too. feminists can flip any s~~~ around to prove oppression, with any challenge to the assertion being further proof of oppression. They will get feature articles in the mainstream media of this oppressive system. You can get a f~~~ing degree in this bulls~~~, yet the patriarchy is oppressing them.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

Check this out from the Economist article cited in the primary:

In popular films fewer than a third of the characters who speak are women, and more than three-quarters of the protagonists are men. Yet the fact that the highest rungs have male feet all over them is scant comfort for the men at the bottom.

Thank Christ somebody said it. It is a HUGE sore point for me that because a few males dominate the institutions of economic and political power that that somehow justifies any and all things done to put the rest of males at a disadvantage. Just sickening. However bad women think they have it from the males “at the top,” they seem completely incapable of realizing that the males on the lower end of the totem pole have every bit as bad or worse. Pay gap my ass. You’re paid exactly what you’re productivity is worth to your employer. The true test of whether or not you’re underpaid in a free market economy is whether or not someone else is willing to pay you more. In which case of course, you should accept their offer.

Women dont think about the guys at the bottom …. because women are ALWAYS looking up. They dont think about what they have, they think about what they can get.

There is no bottom for them

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

I like the guy who pointed out the inherent culture of male disposability. I’m seriously thinking about making up a bumper sticker that says “Men are not disposable.” Not sure that even the MEN in Seattle would get it.

Unless a man looks after himself, gets skilled up and is able to negotiate and foster useful networks, the world will exploit him, and make him disposable.  So, women enter this world and start to whine about its nature and blame men for it, because they have to blame someone.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

So many awesome points. The question is how can we effect change? So many groups have “protected” status and special advocacy via legal and political/lobbying groups.

What the common man needs is his own lobbying group. I really think it’s time.  Now that we’re educationally disadvantaged, clearly disadvantaged in the courtroom, I think it’s time we get our own slogan.

The MRA groups don’t seem to be cutting it.

This is BTW why I peripherally support some women’s causes kinda sorta. Or at least I see a silver lining. The further women go with their BS, the harder and harder it will be to ignore or cover up the way the common man is treated.

Once we hit a critical mass, I think the whiny panzy protesty types that always need a cause to have meaning in their life may start to get behind it, especially since a lot of them are men(ish).

Brucelyn Jenner is the perfect example of how if you take it far enough, pretty soon popular support will be with your cause. 10-20 year ago it was unthinkable that a tranny would get this much support and attention.  Pretty soon the people that play that game will have nobody left but the common man to get behind and effect “change.”

 

 

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[chirParticipant]

Yep put in a few cents myself on how men are just f~~~ing exhausted.  Women are running around bats~~~ crazy and its too much work.  I would rather herd cats….  with a cattle prod.  Heh.

It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

[Author]

Posts