Breeding

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Gnostic wrote:

I apologize if my wording sound harsh

Harsh? Not at all. It wasn’t your wording.
In fact it’s not even what you said. It’s the entire mentality that exists.

The idea that men are responsible (and should pay) for women’s mistakes, s~~~ty/bitchy/cheating behavior, and lousy choices is preposterous – but we see it every day. And everyone still points to the man and says “he should have known better”…

Is that because they know a woman never will?

Interesting question, isn’t it.

THE MESSAGE: “you can’t expect a woman to know right from wrong. So it’s his fault and he’s an idiot”.

You know those stereotypical scenes where a man walks in a catches his wife in bed with another man? What everyone’s first instinct? To go after the GUY, beat him up or threaten him with a fist and a shotgun. But the s~~~ would never happen if she didn’t willingly spread her legs. It doesn’t happen unless the WOMAN WANTS it to.

She’s just “the victim of it all”, a total non-participant and nobody expects her to know any better. Like a f~~~ing toddler.

Gnostic wrote:

The guy paid $50K so a fence is put up to protect him from the lion while he can wave a steak around and doing a naked dance in safety. Dating and living with the lion is akin to cutting down the fence built to protect himself, so he is partly responsible for being eaten by the lion.

If you let a girlfriend live with you for two years, someone could call you “stupid” because in some places that makes her you “wife” on paper – and the ex can collect alimony and you didn’t even MARRY her. Some places are actually trying to change this to ONE year.

Now what if you’re living with a woman for 14 months when they change it? Are you and idiot because YOU should have known better?

You put up a perimeter and concrete wall around your house, and a black mamba poisonous snake finds a crack and slithers in. Were you the “moron” who LET the snake in??

You see the point.

He’s a good man, a great father, a hard worker, and takes good care of his kids.
And SHE is a poisonous snake. Full stop.

Just look at Chaff’s reaction…..

Chaff/Flare wrote:

You’ve got to be s~~~ting me

It’s f~~~ing UNBELIEVABLE what women will do without limits to get her f~~~ing greedy claws into your wallet.

• You could officially and legally divorce her 30 years AGO and THEN go make a success of yourself, and your bitch ex-wife will think she has the “right” to your f~~~ing money.

• Janice Trainwreck Dickinson deliberately went out of her way to “seduce the most famous men in Hollywood“… and had self-induced alcoholic blackouts that she couldn’t even remember meeting Steven Spielberg. And she brings up a case against COSBY????

• You could write your ex-wife a check for $975 million dollars and she will send it back and say “that’s not enough”.

Absolutely morally bankrupt.

…… but all the MEN should have “known better”.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 18]

Keymaster wrote:

You know those stereotypical scenes where a man walks in a catches his wife in bed with another man? What everyone’s first instinct? To go after the GUY, beat him up or threaten him with a fist and a shotgun.

Apologies for derailing the topic but now that it is said I must say I have serious issues with men going after other men for f~~~ing their gfs/wives.

The other man owes the married man jack s~~~. He didn’t marry him, nor made vows to not cheat. She did. Go after her.

The husband must shake the hand of the dude with b~~~~ deep in his wife’s anus – and thank him for showing her true colors. And plan an exit strategy.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Anonymous wrote:

The husband must shake the hand of the dude with b~~~~ deep in his wife’s anus

… and let him keep her.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Anonymous wrote:

The caveman didn’t particularly give two f~~~s about society or if they even had the concept of society.

Have you even studied human evolution. We evolved as social creatures for a very good reason – to survive. Can you imagine a man bringing down a woolly mammoth singlehandedly. How about fighting off a pride of lions without fellow tribesman. Those that were stupid enough to try were killed and are gone from our gene pool.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

It seems like breeding was a primitive imperative. When there were only a few million people on earth, it was imperative that you “do your part” for the species. Now there are too many people running around, an unsustainable amount. Hell there are about 7 billion people on the planet and many of them are starving now, so why make another 2 billion?

I’d rather be remembered for who I was and what I’ve done than my contribution to the gene pool.

It confounds me to no end the way these people think. Their minds are in a world that existed centuries ago, that world no longer exists.

Don’t you want to have kids? Why, and keep overpopulating the world?

Don’t you want to marry? Why, and get divorced because marriage doesn’t mean anything anymore?

Have these people looked outside recently? My advice is to quit living in the past.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Keymaster wrote:

Gnostic wrote:

I apologize if my wording sound harsh

Harsh? Not at all. It wasn’t your wording.
In fact it’s not even what you said. It’s the entire mentality that exists.

The idea that men are responsible (and should pay) for women’s mistakes, s~~~ty/bitchy/cheating behavior, and lousy choices is preposterous – but we see it every day. And everyone still points to the man and says “he should have known better”…

Is that because they know a woman never will?

Interesting question, isn’t it.

THE MESSAGE: “you can’t expect a woman to know right from wrong. So it’s his fault and he’s an idiot”.

You know those stereotypical scenes where a man walks in a catches his wife in bed with another man? What everyone’s first instinct? To go after the GUY, beat him up or threaten him with a fist and a shotgun. But the s~~~ would never happen if she didn’t willingly spread her legs. It doesn’t happen unless the WOMAN WANTS it to.

She’s just “the victim of it all”, a total non-participant and nobody expects her to know any better. Like a f~~~ing toddler.

Gnostic wrote:

The guy paid $50K so a fence is put up to protect him from the lion while he can wave a steak around and doing a naked dance in safety. Dating and living with the lion is akin to cutting down the fence built to protect himself, so he is partly responsible for being eaten by the lion.

If you let a girlfriend live with you for two years, someone could call you “stupid” because in some places that makes her you “wife” on paper – and the ex can collect alimony and you didn’t even MARRY her. Some places are actually trying to change this to ONE year.

Now what if you’re living with a woman for 14 months when they change it? Are you and idiot because YOU should have known better?

You put up a perimeter and concrete wall around your house, and a black mamba poisonous snake finds a crack and slithers in. Were you the “moron” who LET the snake in??

You see the point.

He’s a good man, a great father, a hard worker, and takes good care of his kids.
And SHE is a poisonous snake. Full stop.

Just look at Chaff’s reaction…..

Chaff/Flare wrote:

You’ve got to be s~~~ting me

It’s f~~~ing UNBELIEVABLE what women will do without limits to get her f~~~ing greedy claws into your wallet.

• You could officially and legally divorce her 30 years AGO and THEN go make a success of yourself, and your bitch ex-wife will think she has the “right” to your f~~~ing money.

• Janice Trainwreck Dickinson deliberately went out of her way to “seduce the most famous men in Hollywood“… and had self-induced alcoholic blackouts that she couldn’t even remember meeting Steven Spielberg. And she brings up a case against COSBY????

• You could write your ex-wife a check for $975 million dollars and she will send it back and say “that’s not enough”.

Absolutely morally bankrupt.

…… but all the MEN should have “known better”.

Of course man are not responsible for the women mistake, but he is responsible for his.

If a man go to a war torn country for a holiday even though he have other more peaceful country to choose from. Then he get killed. Sure it is the killer fault, but said man is also responsible for going to a war zone.

I know there are a large segment of society that blame the man solely, but I am not doing that, I am saying both the women and men are to be blamed.

If you do a business contract with another man, and that man exploit a loophole in the contract to pull a fast one on you. Yes, the man is morally bankrupt, but don’t you also assume some responsibility for not reading the contract thoroughly?

You put up a perimeter and concrete wall around your house and do every thing possible to prevent intrusion, but a black mamba poisonous snake finds a crack and slithers in. Then I had done my best. There is no fault on my part.
However if I purposely break the wall to let the poisonous snake in, how is that not part of my fault?

Women are like poisonous snake, there is no argument in that. But if I already know the danger of the snake and still let it near me. Am I stupid? I have the choice of engaging the snake safely behind the cage, yet I choose to break down the cage. Am I stupid?

What’s this, are we now doing a reverse feminism that a man should have the power to choose, but not responsible for the choice he made?

No I am not condoning laws to screw the man that did nothing wrong, nor I disagree that most women are morally bankrupt. I am condemning man that already know the dangers and have protection in place, yet he choose to disable that protection and get eaten.

As for a wife committing adultery, in the olden days, people will beat the cheating man to death and ALSO STONE THE WOMEN TO DEATH. The problem now is not punishing the women at all.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[Joey AlfioParticipant]

Silverstone the Second wrote:

It seems like breeding was a primitive imperative. When there were only a few million people on earth, it was imperative that you “do your part” for the species. Now there are too many people running around, an unsustainable amount. Hell there are about 7 billion people on the planet and many of them are starving now, so why make another 2 billion?

I’d rather be remembered for who I was and what I’ve done than my contribution to the gene pool.

It confounds me to no end the way these people think. Their minds are in a world that existed centuries ago, that world no longer exists.

Don’t you want to have kids? Why, and keep overpopulating the world?

Don’t you want to marry? Why, and get divorced because marriage doesn’t mean anything anymore?

Have these people looked outside recently? My advice is to quit living in the past.

Agreed. I truly believe we got this genetic urge for sex or the need to breed because back then the life expectancy was much shorter and individuals and families struggled a great deal to get by. On top of that, wars and conflicts were a daily thing, especially in Europe, so it further instilled the appetite for lust, loot, etc. Most people lived a very short life and thus there was a lot of competition for the opposite sex but it also compelled men in their short, finite life to reach new heights of intellectualism(ie, the Greeks), conquest, exploration, and so forth.

Δεν υπάρχει τίποτε αδύνατο γι’ αυτόν που θα προσπαθήσει. - Μέγας Αλέξανδρος

[HitmanParticipant]

i remember the two brothers keymaster mentioned,
caught me off guard that it backfired..
when the one began a relationship with one of the women then it made sense..
they do it because they can.
morally bankrupt is really too kind a way to describe her behavior.
.
our world needs less people and better education for the ones here.
hordes descending across continents for “lack of new babies”,
is an outright lie.
.
the only person i love is my kid.
was it worth it all..?
i’m sorry, no.
.
a child needs two parents to set an example of what a relationship should or could be.
a child robbed of this is deprived.
THANKS FEMINISM !!!
the family is destroyed.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Wolfgang Ryder wrote:

You probably have heard something like this:

“So, you don’t want to marry and have kids? What will be of you when you’re an elderly man? Who’s gonna take care of you? Don’t you worry about your legacy? Won’t you leave nothing for this world?”

You’re more likely to hear this from a conservative man/woman than your everyday whore. To me, it’s like an excuse to convince you to breed without second thought (like most people do) and create a “family” (a broken one but still) just to satisfy the will of society to have you in the line and pay your taxes spent on education, food, pension, etc, etc, etc.

What are your thoughts when you hear this kind of speech coming from these people (specially these conservative ones)?

My son will very likely answer: “I don’t want to marry, but I want kids”.
Today men can have kids, their own kids, through surrogacy.
A day men will be able to have their own kids using artificial wombs, feminists will fight tooth and nail to reserve the use of artificial wombs to women.

How it could be a boy raised just only by the father?
I see the changes in my son since I divorced and, even if he spend most his time in his mother’s house, I spend way more time educating him, and I have an answer: AWESOME,
I think that surrogacy and tomorrow the artificial womb are the only legal battles worth fighting for MGTOW.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Juehue wrote:

Damn, my mom just single shamed me like 2 hours ago. Anyway, I said “F~~~ off”

I’m 43 yo, divorced, 2 kids, I even have a part-time partner.
STILL
There’s an ENTIRE ITALIAN VILLAGE (well, most of the women) trying shaming me and forcing me into another marriage: it beginned when I lived for 10 months in the house of my parents after the separation. It doesn’t matter if I live now far away from the village: every damn day I see my parents (and I have to do it quite often: my kids needs to see the grandparents sometimes) there’s a new effort. Their fantasy have no limits.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts