Breaking News: London Bridge Terrorist Attack

[Back in BlackParticipant 1732]

Just read an article on this situation on Reuters. They use the term “militants”. F~~~ing cowards. What the f~~~ is wrong with MSM?

The correct term is “Muslum terrorists”. Also correct”Islamic terrorists”.

They also reference the bombing at the Ariana grande concert that killed 22. They only say he was a “suicide bomber”. Again the correct term is either “Muslim terrorist” or Islamic terrorist”. WTF is this s~~~.

Towards the end of the article they obliquely refer to the Islamic state but don’t make any direct connection between these events.

Only in the final sentence of the article do they use the term Muslim and not once in the article do they ever say Islam.

This is the kind of cowardly s~~~ that is going to inflame some very serious backlash with the real people with boots on the ground. At least I can hope.

It is mind boggling. I probably sound like an old codger but when I was a kid it seemed people had national pride and were not afraid to offend people.

Islam is very very bad s~~~. (religions as a whole is f~~~ed up – in my humble opinion).

Round up these f~~~ers and send them ALL back. I don’t give a f~~~ if they are citizens of the country in which they reside. SEND THEM BACK!!!!

"Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted—in a word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word. Consider how a young girl will toy day after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then consider what a man, with the very best intentions in the world, could do in her place.” Quote from Arthur Shopenhauer, 17th century philosopher

[Back in BlackParticipant 1732]

Pedal,

WTF man, you’re a smart dude…. CNN? Really?

I know you know better.

BIB

"Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted—in a word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word. Consider how a young girl will toy day after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then consider what a man, with the very best intentions in the world, could do in her place.” Quote from Arthur Shopenhauer, 17th century philosopher

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Back in Black wrote:

Pedal,

WTF man, you’re a smart dude…. CNN? Really?

I know you know better.

BIB

I have a morbid curiosity to see how they twist, downplay, and just plain act stupid over events like this. It is a sight to behold, actually.
They are really trying to push some lone wolf type of thing without any facts. The do not dare lay it at the feet of ISIS, or extreme Islamic terror etc. Just 3 bad apples, that is all…

[Anonymous 6]

Back in Black wrote:

Pedal,

WTF man, you’re a smart dude…. CNN? Really?

I know you know better.

BIB

Sometimes you gotta watch it if you want a good laugh. I mean it could almost pass as comedy and not news. I remember a couple weeks ago, CNN had an entire panel on talking about how Trump eats two scoops of ice cream and everybody else eats one scoop. When you dissecting what the man had for dinner, you know they have nothing.

And for real comedy, go on Youtube and watch election coverage from NOV 8, 2016. It should be 10 hours long or so. Watch it in the beginning when Hillary got off to a good start, then watch that map slowly turn red, and watch the comedy ensue. It’s a good stress relief.

[Back in BlackParticipant 1732]

And for real comedy, go on Youtube and watch election coverage from NOV 8, 2016. It should be 10 hours long or so. Watch it in the beginning when Hillary got off to a good start, then watch that map slowly turn red, and watch the comedy ensue. It’s a good stress relief

I get it. I have seen the youtube videos from after the election and it is some entertaining s~~~ for sure.

I just had to give Pedal some s~~~.

"Women are directly adapted to act as the nurses and educators of our early childhood, for the simple reason that they themselves are childish, foolish, and short-sighted—in a word, are big children all their lives, something intermediate between the child and the man, who is a man in the strict sense of the word. Consider how a young girl will toy day after day with a child, dance with it and sing to it; and then consider what a man, with the very best intentions in the world, could do in her place.” Quote from Arthur Shopenhauer, 17th century philosopher

[BritGHOWParticipant 2566]

March 22nd, 6 dead, 49 injured at Westminster, the attacker was “a peripheral figure” in an MI5 investigation but it was determined he did not pose a threat.
May 22nd 22 dead, 120 injured at the Manchester Arena, the attacker was “known to the security services” but not regarded as a high risk.
June 3rd, so far 6 dead 48 injured, no information yet as to the backgrounds of the three attackers other than the fit the image and were yelling ali ackbar during the rampage so smart money is on at least one of them being on the radar.

So, at least 34 dead and 217 injured in the space of three months, murdered on the streets of their own country by fanatic adherents of the so called religion of peace who at least in the case of the first two attacks were known to the security services and still allowed the freedom to plan and execute their attacks.

There are three ways this can end.
1. The government and people of UK will collectively surrender, admitting that the country has been conquered without a shot fired and convert en masse to Islam
2. The government will finally start taking the concerns and safety of it citizens seriously and take control of the situation, deporting the islamist fanatics and preventing more from entering.
3. The people will realise the government is not going to act and instead take matters into their own hands, this has the potential to get very ugly very quickly especially if the government then tries to step in to protect what will most likely be ordinary muslims.

Between this and Brexit the election just got a hell of a lot more interesting.

[bladeParticipant]

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[Mr. SmithParticipant 686]

The spin of the British government now is to install a censorship infrastructure for the Internet to prevent Islamist radicalization. What a nonsense.

First those people don’t get radicalizes by using the Internet itself, but by content provided by other Muslims.
Second, most radicalization takes place in mosques by radical preachers and Muslims.
Third, as long as those thugs can hide and prepare inside the Muslim community terrorists have a safe harbor.
Forth, as long as citizens are unarmed they are unprotected.
Sixth, as long as we let in more and more people with Muslim background the problem will increase in quantity and quality.

The most hypocritical at all is to react with an attach of free speech to such an event. Nothing else is the establishment of a censorship infrastructure. It wont help anything against Islamistic radicalization, but it’s always handy to suppress opposite opinions, for instance to silence a political movement. All Governments here are afraid of the Nigel Farages or Geerd Wilders and call them extremists at any given occasion. It is just an instrument of keeping power, not protecting the citizens.
I wrote it in another post some time ago, this cannot happen if there is no support anywhere. The Muslim communities have to wake up. As long as they protect those thugs and open their mosques to them, they are as responsible as the attackers. If they don’t act, people will act on them and then things get ugly.
Police and the intelligence agencies obviously cannot protect the people. The only logical step is to allow people to have the means to protect them self. The ridiculous gun laws in most European countries have to be reviewed. If you have no criminal background or mental issues you are allowed to carry a gun of your choice. Period.

"I need men, real men, men with balls, certainly not sissies. I would never ask them to take an enemy position, but I insist that they follow me to that position. If you are one of those men, raise your hand." Napoleon Bonaparte

[Anonymous 6]

Mr. Smith wrote:

The spin of the British government now is to install a censorship infrastructure for the Internet to prevent Islamist radicalization. What a nonsense.

First those people don’t get radicalizes by using the Internet itself, but by content provided by other Muslims.
Second, most radicalization takes place in mosques my radical preachers and Muslims.
Third, as long as those thugs can hide and prepare inside the Muslim community terrorists have a safe harbor.
Forth, as long as citizens are unarmed they are unprotected.
Sixth, as long as we let in more and more people with Muslim background the problem will increase in quantity and quality.

The most hypocritical at all is to react with an attach of free speech to such an event. Nothing else is the establishment of a censorship infrastructure. It wont help anything against Islamistic radicalization, but it’s always handy to suppress opposite opinions, for instance to silence a political movement. All Governments here are afraid of the Nigel Farages or Geerd Wilders and call them extremists at any given occasion. It is just an instrument of keeping power, not protecting the citizens.
I wrote it in another post some time ago, this cannot happen if there is no support anywhere. The Muslim communities have to wake up. As long as they protect those thugs and open their mosques to them, they are as responsible as the attackers. If they don’t act, people will act on them and then things get ugly.
Police and the intelligence agencies obviously cannot protect the people. The only logical step is to allow people to have the means to protect them self. The ridiculous gun laws in most European countries have to be reviewed. If you have no criminal background or mental issues you are allowed to carry a gun of your choice. Period.

What happened to the fifth point??

[Mr. SmithParticipant 686]

Sorry, I forgot. It’s about the media. As long as our media censors itself and does not names the terrorists as what they are (Muslims) there will be no real public discussion about it. People know who did it, anyway and hate towards the media as well as Muslims will grow. Honesty is what we need!

"I need men, real men, men with balls, certainly not sissies. I would never ask them to take an enemy position, but I insist that they follow me to that position. If you are one of those men, raise your hand." Napoleon Bonaparte

[xlrsnbrgParticipant 1786]

Mr. Smith wrote:

The spin of the British government now is to install a censorship infrastructure for the Internet to prevent Islamist radicalization. What a nonsense.

Which will most likely be used almost entirely to block bittorrent and kodi.

A man shouldn't make his life's objective to be on the side of the majority, but to avoid finding himself in the ranks of the insane. (Marcus Aurelius)

[Anonymous 6]

Yea this is gonna come to a head one of these days and the liberals will have no one to blame but themselves. I actually believe that the country is in a pendulum shift right now, the country has been so far left for the last 50+ years, it’s time to move to the right for some generations.

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8286]

Whenever a terrorist attack occurs in Europe from the “harmless” refugees and their offspring, President Trump is vindicated.

The social justice warriors will witness this and tell us we’re more likely to die from being attacked by bees than to be victims of terrorism. They want the USA to be like Miley Cyrus: legs wide open and ready to be f~~~ed. They want open borders and unlimited refugees to prove to everyone that we’re not a racist country.

I wish there could be a second secession in the USA for those of us who want to preserve Constitutional rights and use tax revenue to improve the lives of American citizens instead of babysitting dysfunctional people around the world. I’ll call my territory “Real America” while the Pollyannaish, open border folks can have their “Americanistan.”

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[ABParticipant 762]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

I don’t want to make the European countries look bad, but in a way, their leaders asked for what’s going on there. They should never of allowed those refugees in, but someone had to feel sorry for their situation and now there’s terrorism and murder in Europe.

I’m no apologist but there is truth to the comments that highlight all this terrorism as being retaliatory.

The reality is, there wouldn’t be any refugees if the West weren’t bombing the f~~~ out of the Middle East. We blow their country up including schools and hospitals and act surprised when our own children and innocents are targeted.

Foreign policy that includes funding and equipping terrorism and sanctions the simultaneous bombing of Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria etc. just whips up a s~~~ storm that blows back onto our own soil.

Sell someone a machine gun, then blow up their family with a drone strike – then wonder why they try to shoot you with the same gun you sold them.

No-one's yet explained to me exactly what's so great // About slaving fifty years away on something that you hate // About meekly shuffling down the path of mediocrity // Well if that's your road then take it, but it's not the road for me.

[xlrsnbrgParticipant 1786]

AB wrote:

The reality is, there wouldn’t be any refugees if the West weren’t bombing the f~~~ out of the Middle East.

I’m not saying whether bombing them is right or not. Just that the picture is a little bigger:

A man shouldn't make his life's objective to be on the side of the majority, but to avoid finding himself in the ranks of the insane. (Marcus Aurelius)

[Anonymous 6]

Make no mistake about it, alot of this s~~~ is our fault. Obama shouldn’t have pulled all the troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, that left the area wide open for ISIS, Al Quaeda, and other groups to just waltz right in and take over.

Obama shouldn’t have listened to Hillary Clinton when she told him to get rid of Gaddafi. All Gaddafi was doing was trying to move his economy to a gold backed currency and stop doing business with other nations.

We keep drone striking everything over there but somehow they keep coming back, how bout just get rid of everybody!!

But the big problem is, what we are going through right now with North Korea, we’re gonna be going through again in about 15-20 years with Iran. The problem in North Korea is that they have nukes with no way to send them anywhere. Their gonna figure that s~~~ out eventually. Iran is in the beginning stages of their nuke program, and their doing it with money THAT WE F~~~ING GAVE THEM!!! So eventually their gonna make some nukes, and figure out a way to put it on a missile and send it.

American taxpayer dollars funded an enemy getting nukes. Think about that when you think you’re having a bad day.

[Anonymous 6]

AB wrote:

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

I don’t want to make the European countries look bad, but in a way, their leaders asked for what’s going on there. They should never of allowed those refugees in, but someone had to feel sorry for their situation and now there’s terrorism and murder in Europe.

I’m no apologist but there is truth to the comments that highlight all this terrorism as being retaliatory.

The reality is, there wouldn’t be any refugees if the West weren’t bombing the f~~~ out of the Middle East. We blow their country up including schools and hospitals and act surprised when our own children and innocents are targeted.

Foreign policy that includes funding and equipping terrorism and sanctions the simultaneous bombing of Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria etc. just whips up a s~~~ storm that blows back onto our own soil.

Sell someone a machine gun, then blow up their family with a drone strike – then wonder why they try to shoot you with the same gun you sold them.

And there also a theory out there that says, this s~~~ is planned by the European government as retaliation for Brexit. It makes sense. Can’t prove it, but it makes sense.

[ABParticipant 762]

xlrsnbrg wrote:

I’m not saying whether bombing them is right or not. Just that the picture is a little bigger.

I hear you xl – I’ve been reading and watching a lot of content about the Crusades lately. The war between the West and Islam has pervaded since forever. This is quite a good video I found recently:

My point however, is that the recent flood of refugees spamming Europe is a direct byproduct of modern day bombings. We bomb them, they flee their country, we accept them with open arms through a sense of guilt and responsibility because we’ve decimated their land.

The Syrian Refugee Crisis which has displaced 4.8 million middle eastern Muslims into Europe would have not even existed if we hadn’t literally bombed their country into a destabilised s~~~-hole. The same refugee crisis is allowing radicalised Islamist’s to filter into the EU under the guise of being asylum seekers. All I’m saying is, perhaps if we stopped trying to police other countries, and getting involved overseas in conflicts such as those in the Middle East which just exacerbates the situation, perhaps we’d have the resources and manpower to protect our own country. The only alternative to guarantee zero backlash is to level their entire country and leave no man or woman standing to exact retribution.

No-one's yet explained to me exactly what's so great // About slaving fifty years away on something that you hate // About meekly shuffling down the path of mediocrity // Well if that's your road then take it, but it's not the road for me.

[Anonymous 6]

AB wrote:

xlrsnbrg wrote:

I’m not saying whether bombing them is right or not. Just that the picture is a little bigger.

I hear you xl – I’ve been reading and watching a lot of content about the Crusades lately. The war between the West and Islam has pervaded since forever. This is quite a good video I found recently:

<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/dopQ1EcY3JM?start=2572&feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

My point however, is that the recent flood of refugees spamming Europe is a direct byproduct of modern day bombings. We bomb them, they flee their country, we accept them with open arms through a sense of guilt and responsibility because we’ve decimated their land.

The Syrian Refugee Crisis which has displaced 4.8 million middle eastern Muslims into Europe would have not even existed if we hadn’t literally bombed their country into a destabilised s~~~-hole. The same refugee crisis is allowing radicalised Islamist’s to filter into the EU under the guise of being asylum seekers. All I’m saying is, perhaps if we stopped trying to police other countries, and getting involved overseas in conflicts such as those in the Middle East which just exacerbates the situation, perhaps we’d have the resources and manpower to protect our own country. The only alternative to guarantee zero backlash is to level their entire country and leave no man or woman standing to exact retribution.

Stopping America from being the world’s policeman is exactly what Trump has been trying to do, and the liberals are all p~~~ed off at him. Hell he even went to the Middle East and told those leaders that they have to be at the forefront of this issue. America will help where we can, but we will NOT be leading the cause, because it is somebody else’s fight.

Hell he even said that NATO needs to be changed so that everybody pays their fair share. Right now America pays the bulk of the money and everybody else benefits from it.

[ABParticipant 762]

Anonymous wrote:

Make no mistake about it, alot of this s~~~ is our fault. Obama shouldn’t have pulled all the troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, that left the area wide open for ISIS, Al Quaeda, and other groups to just waltz right in and take over.

Obama shouldn’t have listened to Hillary Clinton when she told him to get rid of Gaddafi. All Gaddafi was doing was trying to move his economy to a gold backed currency and stop doing business with other nations.

We keep drone striking everything over there but somehow they keep coming back, how bout just get rid of everybody!!

You speak a lot of sense Venom, and I fully agree with everything you’re saying in the subject. The Iraq situation was even dumber because all the military equipment was left there for rebels to acquire and use in future conflicts against the West.

reuters – iraqi-equipment-losses-to-islamic-state-are-out-of-control/

I watched a documentary before about Gaddafi, and he was loved and admired by his people. Libya flourished under his reign, but as you rightly say, he tried to move away from FIAT currency and they decided he had to go. His Green Book makes for very interesting reading. Muammar Al Qaddafi – Green Book

No-one's yet explained to me exactly what's so great // About slaving fifty years away on something that you hate // About meekly shuffling down the path of mediocrity // Well if that's your road then take it, but it's not the road for me.

[Author]

Posts