Book on male puberty to be destroyed.

[BlacqueJacqueShellacqueParticipant 6890]

The book was originally published in 2013 and is titled “Growing Up for Boys”.

In the book there is a line explaining the function of female breasts. Quote:

“feeding babies and looking grown-up and attractive.”

The article goes on to explain that the publishers were notified of the horrible contents of the book and now …

Usborne Children’s Books, the book’s United Kingdom-based publisher, quickly apologized for the passage and announced on Aug. 31 that it would destroy its remaining stock of “Growing Up for Boys.”

“We recognize that we have made a mistake. For this we apologize and reiterate that the material will be revised. Our remaining stock will be removed from the warehouse and pulped,” the publisher said.

Article here: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/06/books/puberty-book-pulped-growing-up-for-boys.html

What else are t~~~ for?

[foghornleghornParticipant 3449]

So these scumbags are like the nazi’s.

[BushidoParticipant 637]

God forbid offensive content be present in human society.

Taking it off the presses? Ok, I don’t have an issue with that – publishers have that option.

Destroying it? A) You only give it more power, more value. B) You look like Big Brother.

This is just a shot in the foot!

Logic guides your actions, emotion guides your morals. Only you may decide how you use them.

[Anonymous 42]

BlacqueJacqueShellacque wrote:

What else are t~~~ for?

Milk.

No doubt all the complaints came from the BUCA! (British Ugly C~~~s Association)

[Anonymous 43]

ummm truth be told. and truth be crushed.

[Anonymous 3]

Haha man, it’s a good thing liberals are too stupid to understand what “secondary sexual characteristic” means, or they’d be reaaaaally offended at science.

[Anonymous 7]

It is complete BS.

Can’t have a young man thinking anything other then the leftard group think, can we?

[HitmanParticipant]

Titties are for squeezing, and 101 other things. .
Burn the books in a big bonfire Nazi style.
Truth can’t be burned.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Titties are for making money and that’s all they’re good for. My ex wouldn’t breast feed because she didn’t want to ruin her money makers. Good thing too because she monkey branched to a millionaire so I don’t have to pay for my son’s college.

Winning.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

If is really true that breasts have no other purpose than breast feeding, then a woman who is past her child bearing years who is getting a mastectomy should get no more sympathy than someone getting an appendectomy. After all, for the woman who is past child bearing years, breasts would then be as unnecessary as an appendix.

If you are not trying to get some secondary benefit from the breasts that you have, then you would have no loss to complain about when you lose them…

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[BushidoParticipant 637]

BrainPilot wrote:

If is really true that breasts have no other purpose than breast feeding, then a woman who is past her child bearing years who is getting a mastectomy should get no more sympathy than someone getting an appendectomy. After all, for the woman who is past child bearing years, breasts would then be as unnecessary as an appendix.

If you are not trying to get some secondary benefit from the breasts that you have, then you would have no loss to complain about when you lose them…

It’s the side effect from putting so much power into the “idea” behind breasts that they signify such a strong part of femininity. Don’t get me wrong, breasts are both aesthetically pleasing and they serve a vital role in the nutritional development of infants.

Still, BrainPilot has a good point here. Why not remove breasts when they have fulfilled their purpose post-childbearing years? Sagging breasts as I understand are uncomfortable, inconvenient and unpleasant for the woman to look at – plus, you could donate the surface skin and/or the fat tissue itself to those women in need. How’s THAT for female pride?

Logic guides your actions, emotion guides your morals. Only you may decide how you use them.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Does Dolly Parton know about this?

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

BlacqueJacqueShellacque wrote:

“feeding babies and looking grown-up and attractive.”

I honestly can’t see too many lies here as that is the point of t~~~ even if the fat and fugly women do not like to admit it.

The fact is the women with t~~~ will use them to attract men in some form or another and the women with flat t~~~ or old t~~~ or breast cancer t~~~ will bitch about the young hotter t~~~ being sexist.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

Hahaha
Puff winning for sure.
Hahahaha

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[BigvernParticipant 1983]

foghornleghorn wrote:

So these scumbags are like the nazi’s.

Yep! FEMINAZI’S = AWALT.

"What made you think, there'd be a livin' in sheep?, Eat, Work, Eat Work and Sleep" - Mark Knopfler.

[Author]

Posts