Hillary more likely to start a war then Trump because Vagina

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

So the story goes that women have a pacifying effect on men.

Feminists have been using this canard for any excuse to do men out of any position of power since there were feminists.

The truth is that women when leaders are 27 percent increase in wars of aggression throughout recent history 1480-1913 with the record of a total of 28 queens examined.

Hillary is a known militarist who fully supported sending out troops into the disaster that is Iraq. She was one of the crowd that included the President, some senators and some congressman that pronounced that going to war was so necessary that we deposed a sitting president. She shown that she is a military incompetent by not overprotecting our most dangerous embassies and instead cut the funding for military assistance.

The rest of the article blames it on the menz because, according to this paper, female monarchs have too much time on their hands as their husbands are put to work to do the dirty work leaving her majesty time.

And you know what busy bee’s do with their time and neither do I but, according to the article, it gave women time to plot these wars.

After sifting through historical data on queenly reigns across six centuries, two political scientists have found that it’s more complicated than that. In a recent working paper, New York University scholars Oeindrila Dube and S.P. Harish analyzed 28 European queenly reigns from 1480 to 1913 and found a 27 percent increase in wars when a queen was in power, as compared to the reign of a king. “People have this preconceived idea that states that are led by women engage in less conflict,” Dube told Pacific Standard, but her analysis of the data on European queens suggests another story.

http://archive.is/oIXmp#selection-793.0-811.73

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Women starting violent and destructive wars & conflicts, threats, hostage holding, can be seen in every household, marriage and personal relationship.

Imagine that on a national level.

A female commander and chief of a nation’s military is as unspeakable as her willingness to charge head first into battle wielding an epee – herself. If she’s not willing to do it herself, she should have no ability to send soldiers off to slaughter.

Puffin Stuff wrote:

27 percent increase in wars when a queen was in power,

Interesting! But not all that surprising. One may think it would be higher. After all, who initiates the conflicts, 72% of all divorce and dramas when a woman lives with you?

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

I’d be surprised if she isn’t locked up or dies from being an old ass goat.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Women are the kind of people willing to start a war with you if you call them ugly. Iran will say that america has a bitch as a leader then it will go up in flames the next day. Of course hillary will never go into battle nor does she even have a major threat of drying (secret service puts up bulletproof class during every speech and even at elementary schools).

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[Anonymous 24]

I guess none of you saw her at the AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee, one of the most powerful lobby groups in the country) summit recently. She is and has been a pawn of Israel her entire career (s~~~, all our presidents are, but she takes the cake). So yea, she wants war for sure against anybody Israel wants destroyed. She was rattling the sabre pretty hard against Iran, and was making fun of Trump for being “neutral” on the Israel/Palestine situation. Trump rolled back his very intelligent statements at the summit and said he supported Israel, when he had previously said something to the affect of “I need to be neutral, how else can I help facilitate a deal”. This drew the ire of many Zionist Jews. Interestingly, Sanders did not go to this latest summit. I think he may truly not be about catering to special interest groups as he says. Hillary is just going to be a continuation of the establishment that I can see has been going in the same direction since Bill. Expect more and more B.S. in the Mid East followed by more and more terrorism. She will win, and that f~~~ing sucks on so many levels.

[Maraudrz1Participant 2250]

I totally agree with you, brother. You said that Trump catered a bit to the Jewish lobby. I don’t have a problem with that. Trump may have to cater a bit to certain lobby groups to get in office and I really don’t care about that. He needs to get in office to start doing what needs to be done to set this country back on the right course.

I don’t understand the fear of people of Trump getting into office. We have a check and balance system of government that is supposed to prevent any tyranny or monarchy. I believe that Trump has the best interest of the country at heart. But it has to have good people in all three Branches of Government to be maintained and operational to be good for the people. What we have now are people in Government that are undermining our system of government. It is my belief that Trump will at least partially if not completely restore the integrity of our government. We need someone like that in office. This is why the Establishment is so terrified of him. They have their own system that allows them to suckle at the teat of our governmental budget and reap a great deal of money. They don’t mind giving crumbs to welfare beneficiaries to get their votes. This is a huge part of the deficit and goes to a huge amount of people who get a miniscule amount compared to what the “elites” get per person. The hard working taxpayer and their children and grandchildren and so on will have to pay this but the elite doesn’t care about anybody but themselves and their own.

BTW, I did see the speeches and was disgusted for the most part by that witch. I could go on but my hands are tired. MGTOW!!!

Women's brains and vagina have one thing in common. There is nothing in there until a man puts something in there.

[Anonymous 24]

Yea, I agree with most of that. I am not so sure much would change even it Trump won though. Obama said a lot of s~~~ in 07′ then did basically the exact opposite. I am not so sure how much our presidents get to do their own thing, especially in regards to foreign policy. I do feel that Trump’s ego, and b~~~~, may make him the type of guy to say F’ YOU! And actually make some changes. One can hope…

[Anonymous 11]

Hillary is the neo-con establishment’s pet hence the propaganda campaign against Trump. Endless war is the establishment’s bread and butter. Plenty of money to be made making more terrorists than there were before.

My prediction is that for every RINO that votes for Hillary. 250 fed up Democrats will cross the line.

Look at the facts. Everything Hillary has touched has turned to s~~~. Except for trading cattle futures, she’s really good at that. A 100% perfect success rate occurred across all of her trades. Even professional futures traders cannot accomplish that. Hillary is the fetid corpse pulled from a sunken car after a month.

The fact this criminal c~~~ is a serious contender for President shows how far the US has fallen. Yes, cause Vagina….

[Author]

Posts