BBC Sports reporting is now total Feminazi

Topic by Thaddeus

Thaddeus

Home Forums MGTOW Central BBC Sports reporting is now total Feminazi

This topic contains 13 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by Branched off  Branched off 2 years ago.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #727649
    +10
    Thaddeus
    Thaddeus
    Participant
    71

    So, the Greatest of All Time, Roger Federer, won his 20th Grand Slam tourney, beating Marin Cilic at the Australian Open 6-2, 6-7, 6-3, 3-6, 6-1. The guy is amazing even at 36: he is THRASHING guys in their 20s and only dropped ONE set in winning the whole Aussie Open. What a legend.

    But get a load of the SJW-converged/feminazi BBC’s take on this:

    “Federer, 36, becomes only the fourth player after Margaret Court, Serena Williams and Steffi Graf to win 20 or more major singles titles.”

    Yup, that’s right, that’s exactly why he’s so well-regarded… Because he’s the fourth-most-accomplished tennis player in tennis history….after a bunch of women he could beat one-handed, all at the same time.

    "And I find more bitter than death the woman, whose heart is snares and nets, and her hands as bands: whoso pleaseth God shall escape from her; but the sinner shall be taken by her."

    #727652
    +2
    PuniShredder
    PuniShredder
    Participant
    2268

    Typical. Delete the c~~~s from all vantage.

    Be professional be polite but always have a plan to kill everyone you meet.

    #727661
    +4
    Suggestius
    Suggestius
    Participant
    3312

    “Federer, 36, becomes only the fourth player after Margaret Court, Serena Williams and Steffi Graf to win 20 or more major singles titles.

    Feminazi will end up like their predecessors Nazi.

    Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

    #727663
    +3
    Secret Agent MGTOW
    Secret Agent MGTOW
    Participant
    22546

    So, the Greatest of All Time, Roger Federer, won his 20th Grand Slam tourney, beating Marin Cilic at the Australian Open 6-2, 6-7, 6-3, 3-6, 6-1. The guy is amazing even at 36: he is THRASHING guys in their 20s and only dropped ONE set in winning the whole Aussie Open. What a legend.

    But get a load of the SJW-converged/feminazi BBC’s take on this:

    “Federer, 36, becomes only the fourth player after Margaret Court, Serena Williams and Steffi Graf to win 20 or more major singles titles.”

    Yup, that’s right, that’s exactly why he’s so well-regarded… Because he’s the fourth-most-accomplished tennis player in tennis history….after a bunch of women he could beat one-handed, all at the same time.

    He could beat all those women easily. Plus men play five full sets, women only three sets. The girls would be destroyed utterly playing five sets.

    Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

    #727668
    +4
    MoreSky
    MoreSky
    Participant
    4865

    “Federer, 36, becomes only the fourth player after Margaret Court, Serena Williams and Steffi Graf to win 20 or more major singles titles.”

    Typical BBC feminist bollocks. They can’t stand a bloke getting attention and being so much better than anyone else.
    Women’s tennis is not really even the same game. Federer is a legend.

    Reminded me of the Aussie women’s national football team getting thrashed by a bunch of 15 year old lads:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3609949/Matildas-lose-7-0-Newcastle-Jets-15s-Rio-Olympics-warm-up.html

    "...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.

    #727670
    +6
    Call Me Winter
    Call Me Winter
    Participant
    141

    Don’t feed the BBC, no one needs to watch their s~~~, refrain from paying the licence fee, watch all your stuff online via a pc, choose your viewing preferences and don’t be force fed utter garbage, there is so much real news on the internet and you can decide what you want to read or watch.
    It really is that simple!

    As soon as I heard a clucking hen commentating on a football match some years ago I instantly switched off and have never gone back.

    God created man...........then he fucked up! Female empowerment only lasts until you reach the cash till.

    #727690
    +2
    Monk
    Monk
    Participant
    17038

    They never miss any opportunity to push their agenda.

    Feminism, homosexuality, mass immigration, climate change, barely concealed support for paedophilia. It’s all there.

    Blatant Bias Corporation.

    #727694
    +1
    Won'tGetFooledAgain
    Won'tGetFooledAgain
    Participant
    3293

    In 1998 the Williams sisters played Karsten Braasch ranked 203rd in the world and he absolutely thrashed them. Federer could beat any woman 6:0 without even breaking a sweat.

    Another event dubbed a “Battle of the Sexes” took place during the 1998 Australian Open[51] between Karsten Braasch and the Williams sisters. Venus and Serena Williams had claimed that they could beat any male player ranked outside the world’s top 200, so Braasch, then ranked 203rd, challenged them both. Braasch was described by one journalist as “a man whose training regime centered around a pack of cigarettes and more than a couple bottles of ice cold lager”.[52][51] The matches took place on court number 12 in Melbourne Park,[53] after Braasch had finished a round of golf and two shandies. He first took on Serena and after leading 5–0, beat her 6–1. Venus then walked on court and again Braasch was victorious, this time winning 6–2.[54] Braasch said afterwards, “500 and above, no chance”. He added that he had played like someone ranked 600th in order to keep the game “fun”.[55] Braasch said the big difference was that men can chase down shots much easier, and that men put spin on the ball that the women can’t handle. The Williams sisters adjusted their claim to beating men outside the top 350.[51]

    For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

    #727771
    +2
    Awakened
    Awakened
    Participant
    35203

    I just took it for granted that EVERYTHING at BBC was total Feminazi. ??

    In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

    #727778
    +1

    Anonymous
    42

    Does Britten have cable TV?

    It’s my understanding that you pay taxes if you have an areal antenna and receive the “programming”, and that you are exempt if you’re not harnessing the open air broadcast and using CD or internet, as long as you’re not watching the BBC, is that correct?

    If so, why aren’t Britten’s men boycotting the BBC and forcing it into extinction?

    #727797
    +2
    Romulus
    Romulus
    Participant
    4667

    If so, why aren’t Britten’s men boycotting the BBC and forcing it into extinction?

    I wonder the same thing.

    ESPN in the US is trending the same way. The other day I flipped on NFL Live and was greeted on the screen by two women interviewing a third who was at some remote location. Three freaking women hosting NFL Live.

    Its not like it some sport, say soccer or tennis, where these female hosts actually had some time playing the game in actual competition, at what ever level. These three women haven’t played a down of competitive football at any level……ever.

    How can a woman be expected to be happy with a man who insists on treating her as if she were a perfectly normal human being.

    #727819
    +1
    Joetech
    joetech
    Participant

    Plus men play five full sets, women only three sets.

    That’s women’s idea of equality. If they made the matches even, say play four sets…for everybody. Then, they could do away with men’s and women’s tennis, and just call it tennis. I’ve been watching ABC news out of Australia because the feed shows up on youtube. Every anchor they have is a woman. So, it’s not just the BBC.

    "Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

    #727912
    MoreSky
    MoreSky
    Participant
    4865

    Does Britten have cable TV?

    It’s my understanding that you pay taxes if you have an areal antenna and receive the “programming”, and that you are exempt if you’re not harnessing the open air broadcast and using CD or internet, as long as you’re not watching the BBC, is that correct?

    If so, why aren’t Britten’s men boycotting the BBC and forcing it into extinction?

    Yes we do have cable TV. I can’t remember the last time I actually watched a programme on one of the BBC channels. Mostly watch Sky Sports and the documentary channels like Discovery, History etc.

    Still have to pay the TV licence fee regardless. It’s a total con.

    From the TV licence website:

    You don’t need a TV Licence if you:

    never watch or record programmes on any channel as they’re being shown on TV or live on an online TV service, and never download or watch BBC programmes on iPlayer – live, catch up or on demand.

    This could be on any device, including a TV, desktop computer, laptop, mobile phone, tablet, games console, digital box or DVD/VHS recorder.

    "...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.

    #727917
    Branched off
    Branched off
    Participant
    10969

    Yeah the reason the BBC are such c~~~s is that they have a state monopoly. They get our license fee and then they use it to ram their liberal agenda down our throats.

    I have to say I hate the feminist sports reporting on the BBC. Why do I even want to know that women play football at all, never mind hear them talk about it and worse still have to change the channel when they are playing it.

    A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.