Australian Federal Government introducing 'Divorce Tax'

[Solid SnakeParticipant 255]

Our silly conservative Government is attempting to introduce a ‘Divorce Tax’ at the moment:

‘Divorce tax’ in budget as fees to rise significantly

Unhappy couples who are planning to get a divorce or families experiencing a breakdown will be hit by a “divorce tax” as federal court fees will dramatically rise under changes in the government’s new budget.

The changes, which Labor derided as “mean-spirited”, will result in an $87 million increase in revenue from the Family Court, Federal Circuit Court and Federal Court of Australia.

Fairfax Media understands that the fee to apply for divorce will “significantly rise” under the new fee schedule. It is currently $845.

A spokeswoman for the Attorney General George Brandis confirmed the fee increases, but said the full details would not be available until July 1.

“Court fee changes have been announced to assist with streamlining and improving the sustainability of the federal courts,” she said.

Labor’s family law spokesman Graham Perrett described the increase as a “mean-spirited tax on family breakdowns”.

“Senator Brandis should be ashamed that he is taking advantage of a vulnerable sector of society to line the government coffers,” Mr Perrett said.

“Only last month a Family Court judge publicly apologised for the year-long delay in delivering judgment due to an over-worked and under-resourced Family Court.”

Budget papers say changes to the fee structure of the the Family Court and Federal Circuit Court will bring in revenue of $66.6 million, while the Federal Court of Australia will raise $17.8 million.

Of the $87.7 million revenue from the increased fees, $22.5 million will go to streamlining the three courts, while $30 million will be channelled towards refurbishing the Court buildings. This means $35.2 million will return to the Abbott government.

The Family Court primarily hears cases of family breakdowns, child custody, property settlements and spousal maintenance. According to its website, it allows Australians to resolve their most complex legal family disputes. The Federal Circuit Court was established to relieve the workload for the Federal Court of Australia and the Family Court of Australia.

According to the Australian Institute of Family Studies, 40 per cent of marriages end in divorce in Australia.

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/divorce-tax-in-budget-as-fees-to-rise-significantly-20150514-gh1kvm.html

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

I still like one of the lads ideas here where a marriage licence should cost $150K or have an expiry date every 3-5 years (cost $10-15k a pop). That would definately make people think hard.

[Solid SnakeParticipant 255]

DeepInThought wrote:

I still like one of the lads ideas here where a marriage licence should cost $150K or have an expiry date every 3-5 years (cost $10-15k a pop). That would definately make people think hard.

Hell yeah! Then our fellow brothers would be driving around R35 Nissan GT-Rs instead of popping the question and buying stupidly expensive circular pieces of shiny metal left, right and center and then selling his pride and joy for some bulls~~~ slow as f~~~ SUV.

I could dig it, I reckon even the biggest blue pill motherf~~~er would be weighing up the Nissan GT-R or wedding ring.

[HunterParticipant 44]

DeepInThought wrote:

I still like one of the lads ideas here where a marriage licence should cost $150K or have an expiry date every 3-5 years (cost $10-15k a pop). That would definately make people think hard.

I ABSOLUTELY agree.

However, it has been said that divorces are expensive, because they are worth it.  LOL

[MgtowWaveParticipant 4352]

Make marriage , i mean getting  married much more expensive. And prospective couples go thru  some real counseling and psychoanalysis to know themselves and who they are about to sign their lives over to outside of the fog of lust and neurotransmitter induced idealization .

frankly my dear i don't give a damn

[narwhalParticipant]

Increasing the marriage license fee exponentially would never work.  People would simply co habitat and not official marry in greater numbers then they do now.    I would like to see ‘lease marriages’, or at least marriages that come with different terms then we have right now.  Wouldn’t it be great if there was a marriage contract variation where upon divorce, assets were split according to average earnings over the contract term instead of 50/50 (for no default cases)?  If the woman really wants it to be forever, and isn’t looking for an excuse to stop working, then there shouldn’t be any issue with this.

Ok. Then do it.

[The DeletedBlocked 7]

meh.

While this might deter some women from filing for divorce, there are just too many problems. Getting married in the West and other countries with westernized systems is folly, if you ask me.

[Author]

Posts