Aussie Woman's Bid To Spermjack Boyfriend's Corpse

Topic by Oz-Bloke

Oz-Bloke

Home Forums MGTOW Central Aussie Woman's Bid To Spermjack Boyfriend's Corpse

This topic contains 27 replies, has 24 voices, and was last updated by BrainPilot  BrainPilot 1 year, 7 months ago.

Viewing 9 posts - 21 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #829149
    +3
    Aposematic
    Aposematic
    Participant
    2671

    Straight up medicolegal endorsed necrophilia….

    Afinogyny.. from the Greek Afino {to abandon/ to set down/ to leave /to allow/ to let } + Gyny {Women} MGHOW’s philosophy to not engage women without “hating them”. Narcorca =Narcissistic Orca typically spouting to a bathroom mirror taking an arms length selfie ; Wallinate describes post wall females whose SMV is terminally negligible New Years resolution "To not make women happy" . Instadestitue: yet another Neologism for Men that cohabit with women that decide to pull the handle of intervention orders.

    #829150
    +4
    Fr Jack
    Fr Jack
    Participant
    926

    I just finished my post as this story came on the evening news.
    It took 2 years for a judgement to be made because he died without a will, so ‘ownership’ of the sperm was in question.
    The judge has ruled that the sperm can be considered as ‘property’, and as such she could take ownership of it.
    The world’s f~~~ed.

    #829153
    +3
    Grumpy
    Grumpy
    Participant

    Now, let us see if a similar judgment is made enabling the harvesting of ovum in favour of men.
    Equality dont you know.

    There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

    #829157
    +1
    Lurch
    Lurch
    Participant
    3866

    I thought Canada was the world’s most cucked nation, with our boy Justiiiiiiiiiiin! Well looks like Australia, the nanny state has finally knocked Canada of that hypergamous pedestal and now wears the crown of feminism.

    Either way, he should have been cremated.

    Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
    MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.

    #829202
    Gravel Pit
    Gravel Pit
    Participant

    Justice Martin Burns was called to a hearing at 4.30am the day after his death.
    A court order was passed at the time that allowed a surgeon to remove and preserve Mr Davies’ sperm.

    The Justice of the court and the Judge should be DISBARRED for violating human rights.

    If I were in his position I suppose I would have little to say on the matter.

    Bring new meaning to the term “stiffie”.

    LMAO

    She should see a head doctor not a fertility specialist.

    Exactly, this bitch is crazy and that kid is going to be retarded. HOPEFULLY sperms have died or they wont take.

    #829204
    Gravel Pit
    Gravel Pit
    Participant

    judge has ruled that the sperm can be considered as ‘property’, and as such she could take ownership

    That is just so wrong. absolutely no autonomy for a man, even his nuts can be cut off and given to a woman. I think they should look at his driver’s license, was he a DONOR? Still, we’re not talking about a liver or kidney. How did he die? Suicide? Those genes may not even be worth replicating. Did he by chance have any heritable diseases? How about the fact that you’re deliberately creating a son with no father. So f~~~ed up. The lady is mental

    harvesting of ovum

    There is no Judge in the world that would allow a man to OWN the postmortem uterus and eggs. No way. That would be great, just marry a girl, take out a life insurance policy on her. Go on a boat ride off the coast of Florida, oops….and put her uterus in a vat and grow a son. That is basically what they just did to that guy, under rule of law!

    #829267
    FrostByte
    FrostByte
    Participant
    19005

    He must have left something behind that she wants. A home, retirement, or a pension she wants to lay claim to. Every case of baby rabies is preempted by a case of gold digger syphilis.

    If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

    #829272
    +1
    BrainPilot
    BrainPilot
    Participant
    7640

    Why would anyone assume a dead man (who cannot protest) has any more rights in a gynocentric court than a live man who can?

    He’s lucky she only wanted sperm after he died, and not a heart or liver while he was still alive…

    Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

    #829379
    Oz-Bloke
    Oz-Bloke
    Participant
    3233

    The judge has ruled that the sperm can be considered as ‘property’, and as such she could take ownership of it.
    The world’s f~~~ed.

    Indeed the gynocracy’s f~~~ed the world, this female judge putting another nail in the coffin. Here’s a news link about the verdict –

    Toowoomba woman wins court bid to use her dead boyfriend’s sperm to have a baby

    Men’s rights are officially dead. The gynocracy can plunder your dead body for baby batter. Even if the spermjacker does return to work as a bank teller, this is going to cost the taxpayer hundreds of thousands of $$$$ if she claims Family Tax Benefit as a single mother.

    Australia Single Parent Welfare Family Tax Benefit MGTOW

    We now have court endorsed single motherhood, even if you die. WTF! One day these snowflakes will wonder why Australia is broke and there’s no more welfare money available to feed the children born of the Vagina Monetization Scam (VMS) –
    .
    Australia Foreign Debt Graph MGTOW

    #ManOut

Viewing 9 posts - 21 through 29 (of 29 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.