Article: UK heading for no-fault divorce

[MoreSkyParticipant 4865]

Looks like the UK may be heading for no-fault divorce.

“Should it be easier to get a divorce in England and Wales?”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43882061

Under current divorce law in England and Wales, a couple have to prove in court that their marriage has irretrievably broken down.
At least one of five specific reasons must be shown:
adultery
unreasonable behaviour
desertion after two years
two years’ separation (if both parties agree to the divorce)
five years’ separation (if one party does not agree to the divorce)

Tini Owens desperately wants to divorce her husband.

She says she’s been unhappy for many years and she feels locked in a loveless marriage.

For her, after four decades together and with their children now grown up, it’s time to formally end the relationship.

But her husband, Hugh Owens, does not feel the same way. He says they still have a few years to enjoy together.

Mrs Owens, who is in her 60s, cited 27 allegations about her husband’s “unreasonable behaviour” – including that he was “insensitive” in his “manner and tone”, she was “constantly mistrusted” and felt unloved.

But a family law judge refused the divorce, saying her allegations were “of the kind to be expected in marriage”. The Court of Appeal agreed that “in law” the marriage had not broken down.

The bloke in this article looks like he has quite a bit of money and almost certainly knows what’s coming and doesn’t want to give his assets to her because she’s “not happy”.

So it’s gone to the supreme court for a judgement.

What the article doesn’t mention is any changes to financial arrangements, likely because there won’t be any.

If the no-fault divorce eventually happens it will be much easier for women as they will be able to divorce on a whim and still get all the cash and prizes in the settlement.

The Lords in the Supreme Courts are generally liberal f~~~wits, pussies or women (Baroness Hale is one of the judges for this case), so it is likely this is going to go through.

This will be a total win for the feminists.

The system is terrible as it is, but this will make it even easier for women to lie, cheat, whore, and ultimately divorce-rape at will.

Stay away from them. Do not get married and give them the opportunity.

"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.

[experiencedParticipant]

The injustice will be when “no fault divorce” is made law in the UK, BUT the LAYDEEZ will insist that it not be talked about among men, UNTIL they are hog tied with their head on the chopping block.
The men should hire a hitman and state that they thought it was no fault murder and that they’d get half the sentence.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

Waste of time, it is already incredibly easy and you don’t even need to go to court. Download the forms, fill them in and hand them to a county court with your marriage certificate and a cheque for £550.

The majority of people put unreasonable behaviour down and this can be anything from not having sex anymore (Which is all married couples, it stopped a year after you got married and the monthly handjobs stopped once she started f~~~ing chad), to not supporting you emotionally to not even wanting to visit her family.

Just goes to prove that marriage is just a government supported wealth transfer scheme between men and women. A break from the carousel while the woman steals a house and an income for life. Of course the government support it, they don’t want to pickup the bill when there are an infinite number of beta wallets waiting to be scammed.

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[MoreSkyParticipant 4865]

Won'tGetFooledAgain wrote:

The majority of people put unreasonable behaviour down and this can be anything from not having sex anymore (Which is all married couples, it stopped a year after you got married and the monthly handjobs stopped once she started f~~~ing chad), to not supporting you emotionally to not even wanting to visit her family.

The point of the article is that unreasonable behaviour is not always accepted and this takes away any requirement for justification, generally meaningless as it is.

The system is f~~~ed up as it is, but this makes it even more so.

I believe the majority of people go the two year separation route as it is (currently) the closest to no-fault.

Agree with the rest of your points.

"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

MoreSky wrote:

Won’tGetFooledAgain wrote:

The majority of people put unreasonable behaviour down and this can be anything from not having sex anymore (Which is all married couples, it stopped a year after you got married and the monthly handjobs stopped once she started f~~~ing chad), to not supporting you emotionally to not even wanting to visit her family.

The point of the article is that unreasonable behaviour is not always accepted and this takes away any requirement for justification, generally meaningless as it is.

The system is f~~~ed up as it is, but this makes it even more so.

I believe the majority of people go the two year separation route as it is (currently) the closest to no-fault.

Agree with the rest of your points.

My experience was it didn’t really matter what I put as reasons for unreasonable behaviour, the only thing they were interested in was that the forms were filled in correctly.

To me it felt no different than filling in forms to get a passport.

Nobody ever questions the reasons why someone wants a divorce, there is no point contesting it as it is a waste of time and money.

Oh and the decree Absolute is just a printed piece of A4 paper, very dissappointing as I was expecting some sort of a certificate I could frame.

The guy in the BBC story is dragging this out as much as possible to avoid having to give her any money. She sees divorce as a way of getting 60% of his wealth and is p~~~ed off she can’t just take it and that he is stopping her from “being happy”.

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[MoreSkyParticipant 4865]

Won'tGetFooledAgain wrote:

My experience was it didn’t really matter what I put as reasons for unreasonable behaviour, the only thing they were interested in was that the forms were filled in correctly.

To me it felt no different than filling in forms to get a passport.

Nobody ever questions the reasons why someone wants a divorce, there is no point contesting it as it is a waste of time and money.

My experience was pretty much the same. Just a form filling exercise.

Having a completely no-fault divorce takes away the one (very small) element of control remaining to blokes with “unhappy” wives which is time. If the bloke refuses to divorce, the bitch will have to wait 5 years.

It is a negotiating point only, to try and minimise the financial settlement.
The no-fault divorce takes this away.

"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.

[joetechParticipant]

They should make getting married as hard as getting divorced is. That would cut the number of divorces in half. Fat chance of that ever happening.

"Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

[MorpheusParticipant 2177]

joetech wrote:

They should make getting married as hard as getting divorced is. That would cut the number of divorces in half. Fat chance of that ever happening.

What?

Both getting married and getting divorced are easy.

[MoreSkyParticipant 4865]

joetech wrote:

They should make getting married as hard as getting divorced is. That would cut the number of divorces in half. Fat chance of that ever happening.

Marriage should come with a government health warning for blokes who can then make informed decisions, and perhaps more blokes could dodge the bullet and avoid being divorce-raped by entitled, narcissistic, diseased whores.

However, as Won’tGetFooledAgain says “…marriage is just a government supported wealth transfer scheme between men and women”, so we will have to do it as the government sure as hell won’t.

Morpheus wrote:

Both getting married and getting divorced are easy.

And are both very expensive and detrimental to a bloke’s health, wealth and happiness.

"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.

[JakeParticipant 908]

only married people get divoced

[Anonymous 42]

No fault isn’t gonna wash over the isles without examples like the US, and our endless controversy from that particular legal spike driven in marriage’s coffin, among all the other legal spikes driven into Western society since the restructuring began over 150 years ago, progressively marching lockstep into destruction.

A women killing her offspring, destroying her family, ruining her society, and sanctified by law, is about as destructive as it gets!

Lurkers, trust me, TURN AND WALK AWAY…

[WallyParticipant]

Picture all the married people and the government swimming around in a pool of crap, not only the stench but the weight pulling them down telling you to join them. That’s Marriage.

"what a waste of a life, to marry, give up your freedom, just for the hope of not dying alone. Don't get married Son."

[AwakenedParticipant 35201]

The Marital state is COMPLETELY F~~~ED Anyways. So, WHo Cares about the details !!

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

MoreSky wrote:

Morpheus wrote:

Both getting married and getting divorced are easy.

And are both very expensive and detrimental to a bloke’s health, wealth and happiness.

Spot on, if you are an average guy with an average income then divorce can totally ruin your life. You end up homeless with your entire possesions in the back of a car and little money and zero chance of buying another property. She will most likely keep the house and move Chad in while you get to pay the mortgage and live at your parents house. If you have been there you can see why the dark thoughts can get too much and some brothers do something stupid.

The whole point of this BBC article is that they want to make it easier and faster for women to get a divorce. The man in this article wants to delay his wife from getting her hands on his wealth so is doing the only thing possible, contesting divorce until 5 years is up. Now obviously this is costing a fortune but I assume he would rather the money go to solicitors than his gold digging wife.

The only reason the government is going to want to make divorce even easier is so that women can get their hands on the payout quicker so they don’t have to support the woman with benefits.

This is the crux of the story brothers, the government don’t care about men they just want the wealth transfer to be easier for women.

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant]

Won'tGetFooledAgain wrote:

She sees divorce as a way of getting 60% of his her wealth

I think if you look in your cold black heart, you will accept my gynocentric correction to your choice of pronoun.

Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

JustAnotherGuy wrote:

Won’tGetFooledAgain wrote:

She sees divorce as a way of getting 60% of his her wealth

I think if you look in your cold black heart, you will accept my gynocentric correction to your choice of pronoun.

Good point, in her eyes it is all 100% hers, the house, pension, savings and any future earnings he may have. After all, she had to endure having sex with a non Alpha so she should expect payment for the rest of her life.

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant]

Won'tGetFooledAgain wrote:

Good point, in her eyes it is all 100% hers, the house, pension, savings and any future earnings he may have. After all, she had to endure having sex with a non Alpha so she should expect payment for the rest of her life.

She enabled him to pursue the career that secured the resources, therefor she’s directly responsible for said resources and should be the sole beneficiary. It doesn’t matter that it resulted from his labor, his brainpower, and his time. She set him up, she gets the credit.

Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

Mother of God. I’ve seen the s~~~ty outcomes of so many divorces in Britain, that I just ASSUMED it was no-fault divorce there.

If its this bad BEFORE no-fault divorce, you Brits are f**ked!

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

Wally wrote:

Picture all the married people and the government swimming around in a pool of crap, not only the stench but the weight pulling them down telling you to join them. That’s Marriage.

I picture the marriage system more like Hell, with the Government hoping like Satan to snare a few more fools, and all the screaming damned reaching up from Hell with their rotting zombie arms trying to grab hapless fools to pull them in.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[AttonParticipant]

Under current divorce law in England and Wales, a couple have to prove in court that their marriage has irretrievably broken down.
At least one of five specific reasons must be shown:
adultery
unreasonable behaviour
desertion after two years
two years’ separation (if both parties agree to the divorce)
five years’ separation (if one party does not agree to the divorce)

“unreasonable behaviour” with a term that ambiguous no fault is effectively law. Nothing has or will ultimately change considering the language. This is all about money nothing more, not monies earned but cash and prizes.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Author]

Posts