Article shows proof the men are catching on,you go guuurrls!

[EskimospyParticipant 841]

Women can’t find a “quality” man huh? So I guess these women are looking for “quality” men as opposed to finding quality IN a man. Well it’s their criteria and therefore it is their problem.

[Robert HallamParticipant 696]

Beer

I compliment you. I have never ever seen where the essence of a “social phenomena” has been rendered down so succinctly. It was just so well said.

[Robert HallamParticipant 696]

I think it is high time that someone point out the fact that females dominate enrolment in higher institution of learning simply because by virtue of government policy such as affirmative action and it is much easier for females to qualify for loans, bursaries, grants, scholarships.

It should also be pointed out that in the majority of cases, these women are graduating / studying / acquiring expertise in absolutely useless fields of endeavour.

It should also be pointed out that women who think they are highly educated, empowered, career driven, independent, and think they are in high paying positions are not attributes that are attractive to men. They typically flaunt it, and out and out tell you that they qualify for better than you because of it. How attractive is that?

[Anonymous 3]

Spank The Misandrists wrote:

It’s funny how females still use college as some kind of universal measurement to determine how successful one is. Men are falling behind in education because most of them have realized it’s useless in the real world. And most of men who do take a college degree go for the hardcore ones, not some sissy ass mother f~~~er s~~~ty c~~~ bone worthless bulls~~~ degree covered with vagina cheese, such as gender study. Give me a f~~~ing brrrrr eak.

There are plenty of highly educated broke dudes out there, with no careers and usually no jobs. Including in STEM.

Are women interested in these men? Of course not. Hypergamy dictates money, and women add this “Status” thing to even further restrict themselves.

What they don’t want to admit, because they are so narcissistic, is the wealthy, highly educated men want nothing to do with their attitudes and age. Education doesn’t equate to intelligence, but those that are intelligent know that a woman’s money and education do nothing for them, and it is a woman’s youth, beauty, fertility and personality that are most important.

It is EASY to find a young woman possessing those traits, and those women quickly are off the market.

These 30+ year old highly educated women are in fact the low quality women that could not compete when they were younger, and certainly can’t compete when they’re older, and are just shouting sour grapes out. In truth, their value is dropping so much that even poor men would rather be alone than put up with them.

No man would choose to define his own self worth based on education and income, as men understand that devalues them entirely as human beings. But society doesn’t give us a choice. These women don’t want to define themselves with youth and beauty, but in fact that’s what society values in women. The only difference really is that poor men aren’t screaming that they are entitled to supermodel wives just by virtue of being poor, whereas these women demand high quality men by virtue of being old and obnoxious.

[DethklokParticipant 153]

The worst part is men are getting more and more educated against the injustices to them. Then there’s the media that wants to pretend like we are getting stupider, and the injustices are against the women.

There is no good end in sight

[Anonymous 29]

bigboy83 wrote:

Interesting article, but it’s still not getting to the route of the problem

Correct.
It is because the c~~~ who wrote that article is avoiding the issue of cause and effect of new inforced social dynamics.
F~~~ her and her article.

[ExsliventxsParticipant 1067]

Cap285 wrote:

Did you see the thing that wrote the article?

Another, “Quality men are gone” article. F~~~s given = 0.0

Enjoy your 12 hour days, lonely apartments, microwavable meals and boxed wine.

Pure gold because of its factual base. The last line gave me a good laugh. The truth is always funny.

The women never stop and think that maybe they’ve over priced themselves out of the market. That maybe their pussy isn’t worth all the s~~~ and risk. This would require them to stop and think, but we all know that’s got a snowb~~~~ chance in hell.

[MattNYCParticipant 2329]

Exsliventxs wrote:

over priced themselves out of the market

I didn’t make the connection until reading this just now, but this is *exactly* why the housing, subprime & related financial crises all hit. Everyone had houses, they wanted them to be worth a lot of money. But they weren’t worth a lot of money…

Economics 101 – X is worth whatever a buyer’s willing to pay for it. I don’t care if you bought the house for $200,000 – it’s only worth $75,000 to me…

Men, whether we’re buying a house, or “buying” a marriage contract with a woman, the price has to be right. And that price includes both cost & benefit. We already know the cost of marriage (including possible divorce) is high as f~~~. And what’s the benefit? F~~~ that noise. MGTOW.

[ExsliventxsParticipant 1067]

MattNYC wrote:

conomics 101 – X is worth whatever a buyer’s willing to pay for it. I don’t care if you bought the house for $200,000 – it’s only worth $75,000 to me…

Men, whether we’re buying a house, or “buying” a marriage contract with a woman, the price has to be right. And that price includes both cost & benefit. We already know the cost of marriage (including possible divorce) is high as f~~~. And what’s the benefit? F~~~ that noise. MGTOW.

Great point, and this cycles back to those annoying as songs, “Baby I’m worth it”, thanks, but I’ll be the judge of that…

Or my other favorite cop out.

“It shouldn’t matter how many sexual partners I’ve had”….. well guess what, since men are the ones proposing (Less and less) we’ll be the judge of that.

Since you can almost directly correlate pussy to money, the economic model makes a great deal of sense. Just look at all those videos of the gold digging whores (common women) willing to date a guy because he’s standing next to a nice car, only to find out it’s not his. Their demeanor quickly changes.

The simple truth is that due to the family court / divorce court system, even if marriage wasn’t just a statistical disaster, a woman would literally start out in the far red as a prospect from the start due to child support , mortgages, all-my-money (alimony), divorce settlements, child visitation rights (lack of) , cars , retirement funds being halved.

Literally the woman starts off roughly $500,000 dollars in the red and that’s assuming you make roughly $60,000 U.S a year.. This is not counting missing out on priceless moments with your own f~~~ing offspring. Single men are just laughing all the way to the bank. No thanks.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

The question should be not “where have the good men gone”. In fact – it’s not even a question, because they don’t want the answer. Because even if they knew where they went – they still wouldn’t consider them as men (unless they were rich simps)
The complete question/statement should say instead: “Where have the good men gone? Quick! Man up! – make some money, learn to simp and get back on the plantation before I hit the wall”

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Author]

Posts