Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Are women trying to infiltrate MGTOW?
Tagged: MGTOW
This topic contains 48 replies, has 31 voices, and was last updated by Eric Lauder 2 years, 1 month ago.
- AuthorPosts
Would not surprise me one bit. They like to go to places they are not wanted or restricted from.
Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.
“Nuh uh, Tom… I’m not like that……..Not only do I not believe there are women who are not like that, but so what if there were?
That’s where “NAWALT” is a massive failure:
Saying “I’m not like that!!!“….
• Shows “like that” is something SHE KNOWS most other women ARE.
She accepts it as a reality but not about HERSELF.• Does nothing to PROVE she is not like that. She merely expects you to take her word for it.
• Does nothing to DISPROVE most women are not generally “like that”.
• But Who CARES if you’re not like that. We are talking about the women who ARE “like that”.
She expects “I’m not like that!” to shut your entire statement down – by using herself as the example. But even the exception to the rule proves the rule. Not all women are like that is a cheap deflection (as you well know) and I have found it very effective to say “well we are now going to talk about the ones who ARE like that. Now step aside and STFU.”
And since NAWALT is a deflection … we will ALSO use http://notallwomenarelikethat.com as a deflection right back. It’s perfect.
The only conversation these women should be having is with cats! They can take their silly s~~~ somewhere else.
which thread did it happen in? It is annoying because being in the UK, I always miss all of the stuff that happens on here due to the time difference…
we should be smart enough to sniff that s~~~ out pretty easily, don’t ya think?
It’s only a matter of time. We see on youtube some c~~~s are trying to get into MGTOW issues, thinking they can hijack it, what they don’t understand is MGTOW is not a f~~~ing movement, it’s a lifestyle to each man their own, keyword being MAN, not goddamn woman …
Therefor they cannot hijack MGTOW, they can only try to sway MGTOW’s back to the plantation, and good luck with that, most of us are never going back to the plague known as relationships or cohabitation. If anything i think more MGTOW’s are going to be going “monk mode” in the future, and say f~~~ the whole damn system !
So yea, they’ll try, because they’re all starved for attention, and want to control everyone … but they will fail, because they fundamentally misunderstand what MGTOW is.
i agree, any account identified as a woman’s account should be booted.
the problem is tho that they’ll try again.
maybe rather than booting them stick their account in an echo chamber. they’ll never know they’ve been sterilized.
Ok if I wash that Red Pill down with some Red Rum?
Original topic is from 2015.
Still in 2017 they just won’t leave us alone…
Security needs to be upped.
What would happen if they organised a very large group to create profiles? I’ve seen this done elsewhere – it floods and effectively shuts down the site.
What does it look like to genuine prospective members? Posters rowing with and abusing crazy wimmin and mangina/SJW’s?
Actually, accepting a “woman against feminism” would be I-N-F-I-N-I-T-E-L-Y more dangerous and toxic than having a feminazi screaming “rape!” and “misogyny!”.
Because the latter woud be obiouvs and won’t fool anyone.
While the former IS a feminist, the subtle kind, the really dangerous kind, the kind who can manipulate men.There’s no such thing as “a woman against feminism”, since feminism is, simply, women’s nature brought into politics.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678