Are women only ride sharing services discriminatory?

Topic by Prefer Peace to Piece

Prefer Peace to Piece

Home Forums MGTOW Central Are women only ride sharing services discriminatory?

This topic contains 15 replies, has 15 voices, and was last updated by RealityBites  RealityBites 3 years, 9 months ago.

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #224448
    +4
    Prefer Peace to Piece
    Prefer Peace to Piece
    Participant
    10809

    Are women only ride sharing services discriminatory?

    Have you gentlemen heard about “Chariot for Women”, a ride sharing service exclusively for women that will start in Boston on April 19th?

    Chariot for Women will not service men.

    Drivers and riders are women only.

    Michael Pelletz, the founder, states, “Women are across the world being harassed and assaulted by male drivers.” His wife is the president of the company.

    I’ll bet ladies flock to a women only ride sharing service.

    Do you think this is discriminatory?

    #224473
    +3
    Lurch
    Lurch
    Participant
    3871

    Do you think this is discriminatory?

    I think it is, but I bet the company will come up with some legalese about management retaining the right to refuse service.

    I guess the old No Shirt, No Shoes sign will have to be updated to:

    No Shirt,
    No Shoes,
    No Vagina,
    NO SERVICE!

    Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
    MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.

    #224487
    +3
    Bobphilo
    bobphilo
    Participant
    1772

    Check out the “New Sexist Uber Car Service for Women” topic for more comments on this issue. It is clearly discriminatory but, as usual, they may get away with it because women are allowed to discriminate against men, like with female only gyms.

    #224488
    +3

    Anonymous
    42

    That’s Boston, who gives a s~~~ about anything in Boston? It’s the third point on the feminist triangle; Toronto, California, and Massachusetts, you’ll see it here before anywhere else!

    #224494
    +5
    Orlando
    Orlando
    Participant
    833

    It is absolutely discriminatory, and illegal!

    From the EEOC.gov website:

    Application & Hiring

    It is illegal for an employer to discriminate against a job applicant because of his or her race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. For example, an employer may not refuse to give employment applications to people of a certain race.

    The entire United States is covered by the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination by privately owned places of public accommodation on the basis of race, color, religion or national origin.

    The fact that there are numerous female only taxi services in existence screams loudly of female privilege. I wonder if there are any man only services anywhere.

    #224497
    +3
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22567

    Are women only ride sharing services discriminatory?

    Simple, if the male equivalent is consider discriminatory, then the female equivalent is discriminatory.

    But, at this point, I am just walking away. The sexist women that push such policies don’t realize they are harming themselves, as well.

    Given MGTOW are being driven from the system, when the system collapses, MGTOW will be one of the groups most likely to survive.

    #225011
    +4
    The Laughing Man
    The Laughing Man
    Participant
    1020

    Things chariot likely didn’t think about;

    1. Drunk ass women are prone to puke in cabs

    2. Uber can add a gender preference feature to its app

    3. If it succeeds they pave the way for a all male service for everything.

    Feminism will eat its self alive and the nonsensical rhetoric they spew will become the ammunition of their demise.

    I thought what I'd do was I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes...or should I?

    #225033
    +3
    Dr. Sable
    Dr. Sable
    Participant
    1064

    Are women only ride sharing services discriminatory?

    Yes, but I bet a large proportion of men would be happy with it.

    Zero Tolerance

    #225191
    +2
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    Guys, in Italy we have 3 months paid leave for women who are victims of domestic violence but NOT for men who are victims of domestic violence.
    The law granting such paid leave says “WOMEN”, not “PERSON” or “PEOPLE” or “CITIZEN”.
    Domestic violence shelters accepts just only women, and nobody gives a f~~~ about it.
    Really.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #225193
    +2
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    It is absolutely discriminatory, and illegal!

    From the EEOC.gov website:

    Application & Hiring

    It is illegal for an employer to discriminate against a job applicant because of his or her race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. For example, an employer may not refuse to give employment applications to people of a certain race.

    The entire United States is covered by the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination by privately owned places of public accommodation on the basis of race, color, religion or national origin.

    The fact that there are numerous female only taxi services in existence screams loudly of female privilege. I wonder if there are any man only services anywhere.

    Constitution is worth nothing against discrimination against men: gynocentrism is stronger. Gynocentrism appeals to our lower, basic, instincts, and it’s also reinforced by the mainstream feminist narrative.
    Here 50.3% judges are women, within the younger judges it’s 66% women.
    Do you think they’ll rule against themselves?
    Just add to it that an half of the male judges are brainwashed by the mainstream feminist narrative, and you’ll get the picture.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #225264
    +4
    Jackinov
    Jackinov
    Participant
    5229

    Yes, of course, BUT the type of women to take that sort of service are the types who shouldn’t be interacting with anyone else anyway.

    are you a chia pet in man drag

    #225277
    +2
    Rennie
    Rennie
    Participant

    That’s fine, they’re self segregating. Removes them as a threat to us.

    #225295
    +1
    Varun
    Varun
    Participant
    2981

    This is something like the red bus serviuce in India. The top deck is reserved only for females.

    I will quote what one of my friends who experienced a ride on one of those buses said:

    “Dude, its f~~~ing amazing. Now you don’t have to watch your step every time you get on the bus. You don’t have to watch which side you’re facing while standing up (in overpacked buses, because even staring towards the layddez’ sides in norma buses was kind of sexual-harrassmenty). Best of al, everything is quick and fast; the women just make it slower to get on and get off.”

    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

    #225347
    +1
    RayBandaku
    RayBandaku
    Participant
    888

    This will help men in the long run in having men only business ventures. It’s good for mgtow men.

    #225354
    +1
    MgtowWave
    MgtowWave
    Participant
    4352

    Heres one.A discrimiatory woman only service.

    SUCKING MY DICK!!

    Ill discriminate against her.

    Every time i see a damsel in distress i keep right on going.

    frankly my dear i don't give a damn

    #225444
    +1
    RealityBites
    RealityBites
    Participant
    2198

    How about Men Only Uber Service and Men Only Gyms and Men Only Clubs?

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.