This topic contains 25 replies, has 20 voices, and was last updated by narwhal 1 year, 1 month ago.
- AuthorPosts
The question requires an answer that is based on objective insight and perspective that is the result of actual field research.
Due to the fact that all of my ex-pumpkins that have re-initiated contact are between the age of 40-43 years old, I feel that I am qualified to answer.
(Note: In each case of clinical study involving a Sky-0 ex-pumpkin: All of them had bailed out on me in the decade prior to secure and lock onto what they percieved to be a beta-wallet)
So to begin: YES
Damaged beyond anything that most men could even understand or comprehend.
Damaged past a point where they could ever change.
Due to –
01: Years of pathological lying that has even altered their own ability to distinguish between deluaion & reality
02: Years of c~~~s. Aside from the physical wear & tear. There is the presence of an inability to no longer even be able to remotely bond with or care for a man
03: As time begins to run out for them in terms of their SMV hitting the wall – They realize it and that fact makes them extremely resentful and bitter towards the world
04: Existing psychological issue that went unaddressed in the prior two decades (BPD, Histrionic, Depression, OCD and / or alcohol use or abuse) will have become ingrained and part of who they are. Irrepairable and cannot be treated with any hope of improvement
05: Mentally, they are ticking time bombs. After avoiding reality for so long, they lack the ability to confront and accept it and it can and will lead to a host of other problems. None of which a man would want to subject himself to or deal with
The other creepy thing I have noticed: a disturbing percentage of these women had their kid 40-42, and have at least one small child even though they are 49….nasty.
Sovereignty above all else.
Another observation: most of the middle-aged women have no free time, it always becomes about working around to their schedule. Most have kids that live at home, which means you only get to see them every other week…and there is always a strong possibility that date might get cancelled due to something about the kids. Then there are the career women, who are either workaholics or own businesses…it ends up feeling like you are one of their clients being scheduled in. Middle aged women suffer from neurosis, they seem to have no capability to attain a “happy medium”.
Sovereignty above all else.
Next observation:
If they are 40+, they almost ALL use “filters” for their profile pics. Some do the goofy animal face ones, those are an automatic skip. But the new things are advanced filters that essentially remove their wrinkles etc, some of these dumb c~~~s use them on ALL their close up pics. Are these crones so arrogant as to think we don’t notice this? Do they realize that this wrinkle removal is just as pathetic as the animal ones, and that intelligent men will devalue them based on this? Are these sea hags expecting us not to run like hell, when they show up with hatchet face? As always, their hamster is furiously looking for new ways to inflate their SMV. The state of denial that 40+ women are in, is honestly baffling beyond words.
Sovereignty above all else.
Anonymous3You are spot on there mate,saved me some typing… Cheers
It’s not so much are they damaged, but are they more damaged relative to other age groups. As stated by others, everyone’s damaged in some sort of way.
I’d look at it this way, using a sports analogy. Women 40 + are in the second half of their lives. They went through the 1st half and had a lot of experience. Maybe they had a lead, or maybe they’re behind. Maybe they had some injuries. But they have all had ‘half time’. They’ve all had a chance to look back on the 1st half of their life and do some evaluations. If things worked in their first half, they may continue on, or change believe things can’t go on this way forever. If the first half was a loser, they’ll want to make some changes possibly coming out ahead or still being a disaster. Or, they’ll be stubborn and stick to the original game plan, falling further behind in the 2nd half. Either way, they are usually worn out for the second half.
So are they more damaged? I’d say their just different. Many seem to have made good corrections, but still carry the same old issues or have developed some new ones. To be honest, I prefer the older women, that are still relatively good looking, as I can’t stand the typical issues 20 somethings bring.
Ok. Then do it.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678