Arch feminist describes hating MGTOW and won't allow it

Topic by Puffin Stuff

Puffin Stuff

Home Forums MGTOW Central Arch feminist describes hating MGTOW and won't allow it

This topic contains 55 replies, has 44 voices, and was last updated by IRuleMe  IRuleMe 2 years, 8 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 56 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #490624
    +14
    Puffin Stuff
    Puffin Stuff
    Participant
    24979

    This debate between Maureen Dowd, Camille Paglia and very feminist woman who’s name I don’t remember said in opening monologue in a conference on whether men are necessary at all.

    It is well known and parts have been discussed here.

    I want to discuss the opening remark of the ultra-feminist.

    In it she says that not only does she think that feminism and taking care of men are necessary but that she is not going to “let men off” from their responsiblities.

    She doesn’t know it yet but she’s saying that going your own way is such a superior position that she, as a feminist, will not allow men to just “go their own way.

    Here’s the except from the ultra-feminist.

    Think about it. Do women gain anything from men becoming obsolete? If we are the only ones
    triumphing in work and education, and the economy and politics and business, but yet we still
    retain our old kingdoms of homemaking and child-raising, do we win? No. Because if that
    happens, then we will be doing everything! And I don’t know about you, but I’m quite
    knackered. The question is, are men obsolete? And my conclusion to this question is: “No, I
    won’t let you be, you f~~~ers! We are going 50/50 in this world, goddammit, or I’ll never have
    the chance to watch the Breaking Bad boxset!”

    https://www.munkdebates.com/MediaStorage/Debates/EndOfMen/Docs/EndOfMenTranscript.pdf?ext=.pdf

    #icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

    #490633
    +16

    Anonymous
    11

    She has no choice. MGTOWs don’t obey.

    #490636
    +6
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    They can’t really force us to stay. Taxes, yes.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #490639
    +9
    Blade
    blade
    Participant

    F~~~in aint going back to the plantation . My priest many others have tried getting me to put chains back on . F~~~ them and f~~~ society to . Society is paying for my destruction . Yep they can pay my f~~~ing pension i have earnt that .

    Yer try getting me to do s~~~ for ya cupcakes . My slavery days are long gone . Not going back , never . They would need a decent crew to get me back there .

    F~~~ that
    VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

    THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

    #490644
    +4

    Anonymous
    43

    I can’t heeeeeeeeeeere you. I’ve walked, no I got in a jet plane and am zoom climbing away from you!

    #490649
    +4

    Anonymous
    25

    Cpig beat me to it.

    She has absolutely no choice or say in the matter.

    My freedom my choice. I don’t swear very often, but “f~~~ you sister”

    #490653
    +7
    Awakened
    Awakened
    Participant
    35202

    HO’s are NEVER SATISFIED !!

    They wanted to Work, To have a Career, To be the Boss, ETC., The P.C. world GAVE them ALL of this PLUS MORE !!

    MGTOW are just Helpin to clear the path by LEAVING THEM the whole Mother F~~~in Plantation, and yet that’s NOT ENOUGH !!

    They still want to RETAIN US as Slaves to Keep doing ALL THE HEAVY LIFTING.

    Sorry HO’s, this is ONE Thing that you and your P.C. Cronies can’t get !!

    Enjoy your cats and boxes of wine !!

    Bottoms Up HO’s !!

    In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

    #490654
    +7
    Slayher
    Slayher
    Participant
    2074

    My response to feminist drivel: You’re boring and my feet work.
    (Start walking away)

    #490655
    +6
    Xlrsnbrg
    xlrsnbrg
    Participant
    1786

    she is not going to “let men off” from their responsiblities.

    The first 30 seconds of this video sums up my reaction:

    A man shouldn't make his life's objective to be on the side of the majority, but to avoid finding himself in the ranks of the insane. (Marcus Aurelius)

    #490657
    +4
    Chase Pesos
    Chase Pesos
    Participant
    2136

    I don’t see how homemaking is a factor of there are no men in the equation. They can keep that ‘skill’ for themselves.

    Chase a check, never chase a chick...

    #490661
    +7

    Anonymous
    42

    Never listen to women and NEVER OBEY A WOMAN! Just cut off you b~~~~ if you do!

    Make no mistake, we live in the aftermath of feminism, it shows in the moral deterioration that coincides with each wave after wave of feminism, there’s no more ground for men to stand on outside the ground he’s standing on! Everything else IS FLOODED! Just like Noah’s Ark, and guess what? NOW THEY WANT IN! Not by the way of invitation! Rather by cutting holes in the sides of the vessel! They’ll drown long before they get past the Oak timbers protecting vessel MGTOW, AKA IRONSIDES!

    #490665
    +6
    Trapper
    Trapper
    Participant
    2912

    Are men obsolete? Wrong question feminists.

    Are feminists and their opinions relevant? That’s what you need to ask. The answer is absolutely not in my life. I don’t mind doing 100% of the work. No 50/50 split needed. You’re all s~~~ty cooks anyway.

    #490670
    +7

    Anonymous
    42

    I don’t mind doing 100% of the work. No 50/50 split needed.

    50/50 split? Not hardly! They’re 100% TAKE! Then move onto the the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE, then move on the next guy and TAKE

    #490673
    +6
    Slayher
    Slayher
    Participant
    2074

    50/50. The illusion that everything in a relations~~~ is equally divided.

    It’s total bulls~~~.

    Guess who gets to decide what that 50/50 means? Not you.

    Added bonus: When she’s not happy with the 50/50 extorti…arrangement guess who is going to be blamed, shamed, and maimed?

    #490675
    +3
    Virgil
    Virgil
    Participant
    970

    But what about the strong independent women that dont need a man..?

    Either she’s completely full of s~~~ or they’ve all been lying, who’d have thought it…women lying.

    Course given the fact that many of us here that tried in the past to contribute got reamed in divorce court or some other gynocentric system. They made their choices, now they can live with them.

    Will give them a hint. First step toward being independent is take responsibility when you screw up. But we all know that will never happen.

    Hope that someday I may lead others the path I have learned. As Virgil led Dante through Hell.

    #490676
    +4
    Narwhal
    narwhal
    Participant

    I don’t think that your interpreting her statements correctly, because I don’t think she even understands what she means. She doesn’t even seem to have a clue about how the world works, what equality means, or the concept of action/reaction. It really isn’t worth trying to understand it.

    I understand that we don’t want to ignore the nonsense since it could come back to haunt us, but how does her claim, her desire to take half of this imaginary workload even manifest itself in reality? You might be able to force labor, slavery, at low level jobs, but you can’t do that in education, economics, politics, etc as she suggests. You must provide incentive for those career paths, and that incentive must allow for them to spend time and money as they please….which very well means going your way.

    Therefore, the only real weapons they have are shame and manipulation, which doesn’t work on anyone who doesn’t give a crap.

    Ok. Then do it.

    #490682
    +8
    Awakened
    Awakened
    Participant
    35202

    I don’t mind doing 100% of the work. No 50/50 split needed. You’re all s~~~ty cooks anyway.

    I have found that even with a Useless HO around, I still do about 90% of EVERYTHING, and am perfectly CAPABLE to do the other 10% as well !!

    In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

    #490690
    +2
    Big Boss
    Big Boss
    Participant
    4496

    Welp, she’s f~~~ed.

    #490693
    +5
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    Oh right. NOW they want to go 50/50 in this world.
    Thousands of years too late.

    Why didn’t women want to go ’50/50″ when men were battling the insurmountable forces of nature? Why didn’t woman claw their way to trying to break the sound barrier? Afraid they would crash and burn?? Why didn’t women offer to lay millions of miles of railway tie? Where were women when Hurricane Sandy blew through town?

    Oh right. Because men would “allow” it.

    50/50. That tickles.

    Men are pretty knackered and can now afford to take at least one century off. Here you go ladies. Here’s a shovel. Get to work. You can start by building London’s new super sewer.

    FLUSSSSSSHHHHHHHHH…..

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #490695
    +4
    Trapper
    Trapper
    Participant
    2912

    I don’t mind doing 100% of the work. No 50/50 split needed. You’re all s~~~ty cooks anyway.

    I have found that even with a Useless HO around, I still do about 90% of EVERYTHING, and am perfectly CAPABLE to do the other 10% as well !!

    Exactly, she brought up the 50/50 split in her article as if it was a real thing.

    In my defense, I was on the toilet when I gave my first response. I put the seat back up when I left…

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 56 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.