Apparently Women hate it when they have to pay alimony, Go figure

[Guardian-1Participant 35]

More Women Are Paying Alimony In Divorce Settlements & THEY ARE P~~~ED!!!!

To quote the video,
“They think that there’s no reason why their Ex-spouse cant be as equally self sufficient”
Hmmm…. really now? thease are the same women who have no problem whatsoever taking alimony from men in the divorce but they hate it when they have to pay? You’d think the feminists are going to protest this but no, know why? because that would take away one major stem of power they had in the family courts

[Soldier-MedicParticipant 2566]

When have women hated paying for anything but shoes?

Just so long as it’s with your money.

"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.

[Anonymous 3]

lol that’s women for you. Eve tried to argue that it was all Adam’s fault and only he should be kicked out of Eden and not her. God was having none of it and booted her out too.

[FermatParticipant 3478]

Money will be death of feminism.  When the economy tanks and the standard of living increases in the US women will be running around looking for men to save and sustain them. They will look for men to pay more to support their children so they can be free from responsibility. Their argument against alimony is only the beginning.  Women wanted to be primary breadwinners.  So now they have to face the consequences that they are no longer financial victims and must pay men. The future is both grim and bright.

I have discovered a truly remarkable list of reasons why women are not necessary for a happy life, but alas this margin is too small to contain it.

[UntamedParticipant]

Karma’s a bitch. Suck it up sweetheart

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[sidecarParticipant 35842]

Anonymous wrote:

lol that’s women for you. Eve tried to argue that it was all Adam’s fault and only he should be kicked out of Eden and not her. God was having none of it and booted her out too.

Just imagine all the trouble that could have been prevented if only God had turned Adam’s rib into video games and porn instead.

[J.D SilvernailParticipant 383]

Finally some true social justice. I hope this trend continues.

I'm married to the game,but she broke her vows.

[SilverstoneParticipant 133]

Oh no! They’re actually getting treated like equals! Equality means equal responsibility and consequence as well, you don’t get to get all the good and none of the bad. F~~~ing feminist hypocrisy, it’s about damn time. This is what you wanted ladies! Doesn’t feel so good does it? hahahahahahaha

[BritGHOWParticipant 2566]

Beware what you wish for ladies, there are only so many high paid jobs to go around, and if you’re doing them men can’t, the right to work said high paid jobs comes with the responsibility that you’re the main breadwinner and you pay the alimony in a divorce.

J.D Silvernail wrote:

Finally some true social justice. I hope this trend continues.

At the risk of sounding somewhat bitter and twisted true social justice would be when women start going to prison for not being able to keep up with alimony payments far in excess of their income, but something tells me laws will change far before we get to that point.

[mgtow_85Participant 752]

Women hate paying alimony?

Okay, I guess I’m supposed to show some sympathy, but I really don’t give a f~~~. Not when my dad had to pay 75 percent of his pay to my mom for c/s and alimony and she spent 300 dollars a week on clothes and feminine s~~~ while her 7 kids had to wear church-donated clothes and eating instant macaroni and cheese and Ramen. Not when my mom thought $1950 a month from my dad wasn’t enough and called him a “deadbeat” and threatened to hold the kids hostage from his visitation days. She had to get a job at the post office to further advance her spending habits. Luckily within a year, my dad got full custody and no longer had to pay that s~~~. I had joined the army by then, two of my sisters moved out early to avoid my mom’s psychotic, abusive behavior, and my mom got admitted to a nuthouse for 9 months.

She never did get full custody of the younger kids again. Sure, she bitched and moaned about the lost opportunities to exploit her kids as they got old enough to get jobs while under her roof and rules so she could confiscate our paychecks as well, but she never had to pay my dad a dime in child support like he had been court-ordered to before. Women’s privilege, right? My dad had to financially support the 4 remaining kids out of his own pocket while my mom was free to give out X-rated sex acts and blow jobs to upper-middle class guys in exchange for free rent on some apartment and other favors. In between that s~~~, she would try to move in with my sisters, promise to pay rent, and then wear out her welcome in no time flat once she realized my sisters were calling the shots, making the rules, and could evict her at any time.

And then her looks started to go once her fourth marriage went to s~~~. No one found her attractive and so she couldn’t sleep with men for favors.

She is now currently a homeless street urchin, unloved and unwanted.

But she never had to pay alimony or child support. Women’s privilege is really suiting her now, isn’t it???

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

So now gentleman …. can mgtow now get married? To the financially right woman?

Mgtow .. get married … get divorced … get alimony …. by bigger bike and truck.

EQUAILTY

[BDParticipant 1146]

ILiveAgain wrote:

So now gentleman …. can mgtow now get married? To the financially right woman

In theory it sounds good,

but… angry women do crazy s~~~, she’ll probably falsely accuse you of something and them you’re f~~~ed again…

I wouldn’t do it, it’s like sticking your hand into a bear trap.

Because in order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive.

[Mango IngawayParticipant 2264]

BD wrote:

In theory it sounds good, but… angry women do crazy s~~~, she’ll probably falsely accuse you of something and them you’re f~~~ed again… I wouldn’t do it, it’s like sticking your hand into a bear trap.

I’d rather not depend on a woman, to be honest. If you owe anything to one of the vaginas, prepare for some blackmail when she doesn’t get what she wants.

It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Let the trollops keep paying alimony.

Sounds harsh?  That’s tough s~~~!

 

Some men had no other choice but to pay.

 

 

[RoyDalParticipant]

Soldier-Medic wrote:

When have women hated paying for anything but shoes?

Just so long as it’s with your money.

Add in purses, dresses, and flashy jewelry and you’ve got me. Oh wait, let us not forget luxury cars, and wrist~~~ches that cost more than a luxury car.

Have a ball girls! I’m keeping my money to myself. Yes, I’m a selfish pig, but I’m a financially solvent selfish pig, and no thanks to you all.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[FrankOneParticipant 1435]

I don’t think women should have to pay alimony any more than men should have to pay it…  But shouldn’t the story instead, be about why 97% of recipients are men and only 3% women?  Also, since 97% of recipients are women, I prefer to call it ‘allhismoney’.

That said, it’s less common than in the past, with about 400,000 recipients of ‘spousal support’ across the US.  http://www.forbes.com/sites/emmajohnson/2014/11/20/why-do-so-few-men-get-alimony/

It’s great to see men commenting on alimony articles such as http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nina-boug-lichtenstein/why-i-resent-the-term-ali_b_7942922.html — my comment is the last.

[FrankOneParticipant 1435]

type in last post, obviously, should have read ‘97% recipients women and 3% men’!

[RoyDalParticipant]

FrankOne wrote:

type in last post, obviously, should have read ‘97% recipients women and 3% men’!

So … I have 97% odds of losing my shirt if I put on the yolk. Gee whiz! That makes me want to sign a marriage contract today! Let’s all sign! I ask you all, what could go wrong with only 97% odds against coming out with our capital estates intact?

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[BeerParticipant 11832]

RoyDal wrote:

Have a ball girls! I’m keeping my money to myself. Yes, I’m a selfish pig, but I’m a financially solvent selfish pig, and no thanks to you all.

Haha, its like you read my mind!  If a selfish pigs wants to label me a selfish pig because I won’t sign my life over to a woman, then so be it.  While they are busy crying about it, I’ll be busy enjoying my money lol.

[Anonymous 25]

Some men will become male chameleons, if there’s money to be made and the guy is smart enough and shrewd enough to pull it off then he’s living according to his own best interests and levelling the playing field. two can play that game and women deserve what’s coming. there will be an increase in men deliberately rinsing women. bound to happen. karma’s a bitch.

for the lurkers: equality is equality cupcake. suck it up.

[Author]

Posts