Apologies for absence & Vikings Sn.4 Ep.1 Lagertha

Topic by Bob Bashbosh

Bob Bashbosh

Home Forums MGTOW Central Apologies for absence & Vikings Sn.4 Ep.1 Lagertha

This topic contains 11 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by Bobphilo  bobphilo 3 years, 11 months ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #196901
    +6
    Bob Bashbosh
    Bob Bashbosh
    Participant
    160

    Hi guys,

    Just wanted to apologise for my prolonged absence, one of the side effects of adopting my particular MGTOW philosophy is that I tend to become less receptive to all trivial compulsions, not just the futile quest for a compassionate and loyal partner.

    Actually, I confess, I was starting to feel distinctly optimistic when I found a new focus for intellectual stimulation in the form of theosophical philosophies and alternative chronology.

    But then, wouldn’t you believe it, whilst indulging in a bit of long awaited season 4 ‘Vikings’ viewing on Amazon, I was suddenly and shockingly confronted with this..

    I don’t understand why the character of ‘Lagertha’ is hailed as a heroine amongst so many passionate advocates of the series. For me, she encompasses all that is wrong with the post-modern feminist ideal. I was hoping she’d have been unceremoniously written out of the franchise three seasons ago but somehow, no doubt at the behest of certain misguided segments of the subscribership, she has managed to endure. I just hope she meets a suitably sticky end this season.

    Anyway, hope you’re all well and that MGTOW continues to attract more disillusioned brothers. I’ll be sure to indulge more of my time here in the MGTOW bunker in future. ๐Ÿ™‚

    #196927
    +2

    Anonymous
    0

    Hey Bob Bashbosh,
    Good to see ya back!!

    #196937
    +2
    Tiga K
    Tiga K
    Participant
    1693

    Glad to have you back!

    #196945
    +2
    Bob Bashbosh
    Bob Bashbosh
    Participant
    160

    Hahaha, thanks guys, I’m touched by the warm welcome! ๐Ÿ™‚

    Actually, just working my way through the ‘Why women destroy society’ thread.. quite astonishing really.

    I’m no academic sociologist but the vid certainly made a pretty convincing argument. I can’t deny a certain sense of apprehension at the thought of such a hopeless situation coming to fruition but even now I find it hard to believe the situation is untenable. I’ll have to think on it for a while before producing a solution and being hailed as Europe’s greatest emancipator! hurhur

    Oh, and lets not forget the forthcoming EU referendum, I really hope we can muster the support necessary to get ourselves out of the fix we’re in. Damn, so many contentious issues I need to commit to forum inches.. it’ll be a fun weekend!! ๐Ÿ˜€

    #197017
    +1
    Bobphilo
    bobphilo
    Participant
    1772

    Welcome back Bob. I also cannot stand the bitch. I don’t even like the broad who plays her, Catherine Winnick. She’s a mainstay on the rabid anti-male LMN movie cable channel.

    #197037
    +2
    Bob Bashbosh
    Bob Bashbosh
    Participant
    160

    Hi Bob!!! hahaha

    Yes, her character is just so distasteful. No doubt hailed as a model ‘independent’, empowered, woman and a testament to purely fictional historical female personages in a Hollywood revisionist retelling of life in 9th Century Northern Europe.

    All I see is a vindictive, sadistic, opportunistic and really rather feeble cretin devoid of any maternal instincts whatsoever. Can you imagine if that scene was reversed? It would be unconscionable.

    As for the actress, that’s very interesting, I had no idea. Perhaps that’s why she makes such a convincing c~~~ on screen. I really ought to boycott the series but I’m weak willed, I want to see Rollo rise to prominence. ๐Ÿ˜›

    #197053
    +1
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    BOB…. Brosus! Welcome back. Thanks for dropping in and bringing something for all in the house. Great to see you.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #197062
    +2
    Bob Bashbosh
    Bob Bashbosh
    Participant
    160

    Hahaha KM!!! Even a welcome from the grande fromage, this really is a red letter day! ๐Ÿ˜€

    My pleasure KM and thanks for keeping up the hard work, the site has never looked more slick. It’s great to be back in the Abbey.

    #197065
    +1
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    Hahaha KM!!! Even a welcome from the grande fromage, this really is a red letter day!

    ( Rubs toe in dirt.)

    Happy you like the new curtains and tiles. They just went up the other day.
    Picked them out personally, and we didn’t need a woman’s touch (or a note from the wife) after all.

    No man ever does. Beers for everyone.



    โ€“โ€“โ€“โ€“

    I don’t know which is more upsetting to watch. Publicly carving a man’s genitals out (video above), or publicly carving a man’s genitals out (image above)…. by telling every man he can’t even make a decision on tiles he is required to pay for and install without a permission slip from a control freaking bitch.

    It’s the same s~~~ to me.

    The feminists hold Lagertha up as shining example because they don’t have any problem with how leading women are portrayed as petulant, hateful, brats. Women find that hilarious. Even centuries later. That’s how a woman can SMILE all proud of herself when she says “i have his b~~~~ in my jar and purse” – like it’s some kind of accomplishment. They get a real sick & creamy satisfaction out of it, but not a goddam one of them will be able to lay tiles for s~~~.

    They just want the “right” choose and walk all over them.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #197419
    +2
    Hellraider
    hellraider
    Participant
    2837

    Yup, feminists and women in general this days have male castration fantasies all the time.

    Imagine if the scene was reversed, a man castrating a women.

    Do you think the scene would be on tv?

    yah, right. but when a woman does it, its fine.

    #197512
    +1
    Bobphilo
    bobphilo
    Participant
    1772

    Yup, feminists and women in general this days have male castration fantasies all the time.

    Imagine if the scene was reversed, a man castrating a women.

    Do you think the scene would be on tv?

    yah, right. but when a woman does it, its fine.

    So true. A TV and movie staple is a woman kicking a guy in the b~~~~. It’s so common that it’s a source of humor in sitcoms. Have you ever seen a guy kicking a woman in the groin on TV? Even if she’s coming at him with an axe or gun, men cannot defend themselves against women under any circumstances. The message is clear, women are sacred and always right while men are all rapists and it’s alright to castrate them, in fact it’s funny.

    #197515
    +1
    Bobphilo
    bobphilo
    Participant
    1772

    Hi Bob!!! hahaha

    Yes, her character is just so distasteful. No doubt hailed as a model โ€˜independentโ€™, empowered, woman and a testament to purely fictional historical female personages in a Hollywood revisionist retelling of life in 9th Century Northern Europe.

    All I see is a vindictive, sadistic, opportunistic and really rather feeble cretin devoid of any maternal instincts whatsoever. Can you imagine if that scene was reversed? It would be unconscionable.

    As for the actress, thatโ€™s very interesting, I had no idea. Perhaps thatโ€™s why she makes such a convincing c~~~ on screen. I really ought to boycott the series but Iโ€™m weak willed, I want to see Rollo rise to prominence. ?

    I also find the series hard to watch when she’s on screen. The only reason I watch it is I’m a big military history buff and the battle scenes are very accurate.
    Oddly enough Winnick usually plays a “sweet young innocent” in the LMN movies who somehow defeats the “big bad man” in the end – a very common theme on this network. In either case she’s a total turn-off

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.