Anyone Feel Like Calling Out Some Women?

[Governor Megachris%Participant 3584]

I have several women arguing with me online that when the parents of a child split, the “mother is the only one left to care for the child.”

This was one response from a woman after I said how much of a financial bind the woman puts a man in:

“I’m sure the woman raising the child is in a bind for 18 years too…you know, since she lives with the child, does his laundry, cooks and buys his food, goes to school functions, cleans his house, runs him everywhere…God forbid you bind a man up writing a check for 18 years. Pretty stupid to have men pay for their children???  No, really…great argument though.”

Anyone care to tell me how to respond to this sort of thing?  I don’t have children and obviously don’t have the experience of marriage (just abusive women), so I’d like to know how you guys would handle it.  I know some say “there’s no arguing with women,” which I agree with.  I just tend to try to stand up for my fellow men in situations like this.

[Anonymous 1]

I think the best approach on situations like this is asking these women if they consider the father a human being or just an ATM. They are so focus on the father paying the bills that they forget that: a) depending on the father’s job he is sacrificing not only his TIME away from the child (since the kid is with the mother), but his life b) he has NO RIGHT to influence HIS OWN KID’s life without THE CONSENT OF THE MOTHER it doesn’t work the other around though.

Point them out to this video:

And this one:

And then shown them this piece of news:

http://mrconservative.com/2014/04/38047-video-texas-judge-strips-son-from-father-over-manipulative-mothers-claims/

And then ask how the f~~~ is it fair that the father pays child support when the mother can abuse HIS son/daughter and there is nothing HE can do. Is this this fair to the father? IS THIS FAIR TO THE CHILD? Ask her what she thinks about parent alienation, and then show her this video:

To sum up: bombard them with FACTS and VIDEOS and cut their fictitious crap.

I actually had a similar argument on youtube. The women was arguing that the reason mothers get custody is because FATHER’s DON’T WANT THE CUSTODY. I am no father, but despite this, this comment boiled my blood. My original comment to her got deleted somehow (it was a good one with TONS of links to videos and news), but the result of that exchange was she deleting ALL HER COMMENTS.

So yeah, that would be my suggestion, overflown them with facts and press if they consider MEN HUMAN…

Good luck!

[Anonymous 1]

Oh, and for arguments like this, another useful piece of advice is this video:

And, like Raging Golden Eagle said:

Fight like a Troll, win like a BEAST!

Cheers

[Vector VikingParticipant 413]

Bombarding a woman with facts in an argument is a waste of effort.

Men define facts as something that is backed up with empirical evidence and has been proven through testing.

Women think facts are anything that the herd believes and what she feels is right.

[Anonymous 1]

Well, it is a waste of time if your intentions are to actually convince her or reach an agreement. HOWEVER, if you just want to respond to her crap just for the sake of doing it, then I think that’s the way to go. Besides, the “fight like a troll, win like a BEAST” mentality helps A LOT. Since you are not arguing for her sake, but for the sake of argument, all you need to do is establish what are the winning conditions are FOR YOU and go for it. With the woman I was arguing in youtube, my objective was to establish that the family court is unjust to men. NOT to prove that all men deserve custody, NOT to prove that women are bad, just that the court is unfair towards men, EVEN WHEN HE IS THE RIGHT. So I hammered this again, and again, and again. She came with all this crazy things of how “men don’t seek custody” or how “her friend don’t exploit her ex-husband” and “NAWALT”, all irrelevant to the points I was making, which was: courts are unfair to men, EVEN when he has done everything right. It took me a while to set this goal to myself, but once I did, f~~~ it, I went with everything I got. The result: she deleted ALL her previous comments. I win. Did I convinced her? Most likely not. But that was not my victory condition. My victory condition was: be the last man standing, which I was.

So yeah, if you want a productive conversation with a woman, forget about it. However, if you just want to argue for the sake of arguing, then set up YOUR rules and UNLEASH HELL.

[KingOfTheSeaParticipant 1270]

Anonymous wrote:

Well, it is a waste of time if your intentions are to actually convince her or reach an agreement. HOWEVER, if you just want to respond to her crap just for the sake of doing it, then I think that’s the way to go. Besides, the “fight like a troll, win like a BEAST” mentality helps A LOT. Since you are not arguing for her sake, but for the sake of argument, all you need to do is establish what are the winning conditions are FOR YOU and go for it.

I agree; you can’t win an argument against a woman if your goal is to convince her. However, if this is a public argument (i.e. on social media/comment sections vs. Private messages and emails), there is an additional benefit to having a strong, facts-based response: other men may see it. That’s how it started for me; a couple of men out there didn’t back down and brought facts to the battle.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Governor Megachris% wrote:

”does his laundry, cooks and buys his food, goes to school functions, cleans his house, runs him everywhere” […]

Anyone care to tell me how to respond to this sort of thing?

If single mothers really bothered to do all that, they wouldn’t produce so many children destined for incarceration and welfare.  It’s been proven that single fathers are the best parents, then two parent households, and single mothers a dim, distant third.

[DuroParticipant 29]

I’m in a bit of a similar situation. There is a girl I know who I would like to call out, but I already see the futility of it. She wants to become an elected official in Canada, but all it takes to put her into a state of misery is to call her names and make fun of her.

Recently she posted a 7 paragraph Facebook note about how she had a gall bladder problem during an exam and had to run out, and that a bunch of guys posted a meme about it that she took offence to. I didn’t see the meme because she only posted a picture with an incomplete link, so I could not access it. I have to imagine it was pretty funny, but she and her feminazi herd took great offence. All of her friends are sending supportive comments to her note, and I’m thinking “is this a f~~~ing joke? How are you supposed to be a respected public figure if all I have to do is call you a c~~~ and all of a sudden you are ‘traumatized’ and can’t keep your cool?” I mean one of the herd even said to her “You’re going to be an MP soon. This little s~~~bag could only wish he/she would be a quarter as successful as you.” blahblahblah, and I’m thinking “Yeah, she’s going to be an MP. She needs to get a f~~~ing grip! If this happened to a man and he bitched about it like she is, he’d be verbally castrated!”

But f~~~ it! Don’t argue with women!  Even if I level it down on her as nicely as I can, she’ll probably just say that I’m being mean and am oppressing her, and her legion of feminazis will agree. I want to call them out, but I know too well it is ultimately futile. The herd does not care for the truth. They don’t care that a public figure needs to behave as an adult and have a thicker skin. They only care about their trigger warnings and safe spaces and other childish bulls~~~.

I look forward to the day she becomes an MP. I look forward to the moment when reality sets in and she gets the wake up call she needs. I wonder how she will respond to it, but I’d bet she responds as a child would.

[Author]

Posts