Any Predictions for Endgame of #MeToo Backlash?

[MGTOW MonkParticipant 117]

I’ve already seen articles about Florida Senators refusing to meet with high level Lobbyist females alone. Now these female-Captains-of-Industry are crying foul, saying that this will throw female business owners back 20 years, due to the rampant reactions of men in power, whom are now refusing to have closed-door-meetings the way they normally would with men.

Speed this up a few years into the future, where will it go? Will we travel the path of common sense? Or will we go full SJW-bonkers?

If I had a crystal ball, I think Men whom are Captains of Industry or Power, will no longer allow women to meet with them in private, forcing women to take a back seat again. They’ll be left out of back-room meetings where the rubber really meets the road in business. We’ll have articles in magazines and spots of MSM about “how sad it is for women”, but in the end, I see men full-on-face-palming women of power out of specific Male Businesses. Even going as far as full gender segregation.

Possibly even full blown, Atlas Shrugged style. Where men would work on even floors of a building, and women work only the odd floors. Or go full on ridiculous: men will work Mon, Wed, Fri. Women work the same jobs but only Tues, Thurs, Sat. So no one can meet and accidentally make any snarky sexist comments, leading to them being financially ruined and shunned by modern society.

#MeToo is going to kill the corporate woman, ensuring they will never be invited into the “cool club” where the real business is made.

Any thoughts?

A Lion keeps no den. Becuase the Savanna, and all the space within it, all that walks and crawls upon it, belongs to him.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

More men are already going for broke.
The t~~~s are complaining because certain companies are no longer holding Christmas parties and men refuse to hold private conversations with them in the workplace.
They’re being ignored and to be quite honest I don’t give a solid rat f~~~ because that’s what the trollops set themselves up for.

[GargamelSpectator 29101]

MGTOW Monk wrote:

Any thoughts?

In July of 2018, this honey pot forum was sold out to an unidentified NPC sock puppet and troll organization. Most independent thinkers and writers migrated to other MGTOW forums as a result of the never-ending infighting and deliberate trouble starting caused by members who were given "carte blanche" by the admin to do whatever they want. Before my departure, I only left a few thousand cat pics here to comfort and ridicule the feminist owners who now run this place. Their background agenda is to make MGTOW look like a club of losers the public eye. And during the course of 2019, they actually managed to destroy almost all other MGTOW venues as well. Here is the truth about "theindependentman.org" aka "TIM" which was created as an extended workbench to further divide the community. When you register, they install a spyware Zombie cookie on your browser that does all kinds of things the user does not know of: http://www.filedropper.com/essay-on-the-removal-of-malware-cookies-used-by-tim

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

MGTOW Monk wrote:

I’ve already seen articles about Florida Senators refusing to meet with high level Lobbyist females alone.

But that’s to make sure those poor waifs aren’t sexually harassed. Isn’t ending sexual harassment what the laydeez want?

/sarcasm

It just goes to show they are full of s~~~. Their hypocrisy is on display for all with the brains to see it.

If women really gave a f~~~ about “muh sexual harassment”, THEY WOULD BE THE ONES DEMANDING CHAPERONS, NOT MEN.

The end result of this, naturally, is private companies will cease hiring women. When governments try to enforce quotas, they will either tell the government to go f~~~ itself, relocate, or shut down entirely. Government will ultimately only be able to enforce quotas in its own hiring, thereby increasing the number of women in government jobs as men flee that increasingly hostile work environment. But without men to do the actual work, the public sector will collapse in on itself. And who depends most on the public sector?

Women cannot conceive how badly this metoo bulls~~~ is going to blow up in their faces. Just like all their other schemes, ultimately it’s going to bite them in the ass.

But that is not our problem.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22534]

Women will never understand it from a mans point of view because they are not held accountable for their actions.

Of course they cant understand mens concerns, they dont have to worry about being held to mens accountability and responsibility standards.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

sidecar wrote:

MGTOW Monk wrote:

I’ve already seen articles about Florida Senators refusing to meet with high level Lobbyist females alone.

But that’s to make sure those poor waifs aren’t sexually harassed. Isn’t ending sexual harassment what the laydeez want?

/sarcasm

It just goes to show they are full of s~~~. Their hypocrisy is on display for all with the brains to see it.

If women really gave a f~~~ about “sexual harassment” THEY WOULD BE THE ONES DEMANDING CHAPERONS, NOT MEN.

They don’t have the gray matter to understand that!
Mark my words, if this trend continues, they will be stuck trying to trade sex for canned goods!

[Anonymous 3]

Nothing will happen. At least not the way you’re thinking. Not in the short term.

All that is really happening is Hollywood elites and government elites who stood up in front of everyone all this time talking about “strong, independent, beautiful, sexy goddesses” and how awful all men are for being rapists are suddenly being held to their own words and these women they thought knew their place have in fact spurned that pecking order and are making a play as if those words are real.

As common men, we have always been placed beneath women and elite men. These elite men created a monster when elevating women above regular men, and it’s beginning to come to bite them in the ass.

Why should I, a regular man, who has all this time been told women never lie about sexual harassment and that men are evil suddenly forget that programming? I would either have to accept that the elite men are above the law that they themselves made, and are openly liars and hypocrites, in which case the facade is gone and I have no reason to accept them as my superiors and leaders, or I have to side with the women under the “system” the elites made.

I have read all societies eventually crumble that create a different set of laws for the commoners and one for the nobles. So now that the evidence and accusations are out there, we either get a full on collapse of the system, or a culling of the elite men accused, and then they have to work to change the system so women are no longer elevated over men.

Either way, it’s not my problem, and I don’t care what they do. Knowing the aristocrats, they would rather destroy the entire system than fall on their own swords, so that is what is going to happen. You can never overestimate their incessant greed and short sightedness when it comes to that.

In truth, the elites knew all along that men were innocent and women were liars, and that they were destroying innocent men left and right on the words and whims of unscrupulous women. They were complicit. Worse, they encouraged it, they gloated about it, they laughed at men in general, laughed at how helpless men were against the system these evil men constructed to grind the unconnected man under women’s heels.

Absolutely no sympathy. And I am going to play along with the system, and repeat back all the gibberish these elite men have been laughing at us with all this time. We have a lot of it now. Finally I get to use it.

Teach elite men not to rape. It’s not okay. We don’t want to create a stigma against women reporting rapes. All unconsented touching is rape. A woman can remove consent whenever she wants, during, or even after any and all acts. Rape can even occur when a woman is uncomfortable, it’s what her perception is that matters.

And on and on. Don’t tell me these men didn’t know what they were doing the last several decades.

[Anonymous 3]

I guess, what will be in the end is the disappearance of personal trust between men and women.

For example:
-tinder and other dating apps or websites may go in a downward spiral, no one will dare to date or go for casual sex. Or how weird would it be to grab the phone in selfie mode and say to the girl “Now please smile into the camera and tell if you consent to sex” … (and even that won’t protect the guy well if in that jurisdiction a consent can be revoked afterwards)

-no one on one meetings in person. At least an open door or a security camera.
-no relationships, no marriage, no cohabiting, no sex, no dates,
-not being in the same place (for example, elevator or car or whatever) one-on-one with women
-especially no relationships between colleagues, that calls for trouble
-not even talking at work on anything else than work. Forget about flirting.
-not talking to women in any situations more than the minimum necessary. (not a word of fluff talking in everyday situations)

[QuellParticipant 2538]

We already have no women at our company of 27 guys. None of the top brass has any intentions of hiring any females whatsoever and we all like it that way… even joking about if from time to time that this is a “bitch free zone”.

[Black MaskParticipant 1572]

Men will be blamed regardless of outcome.

"Man honesty is misogyny." - Patrice O'Neal

[bagsofsandParticipant 1391]

Anonymous wrote:

Nothing will happen. At least not the way you’re thinking. Not in the short term.

This. Well, I don’t know. I’ve been to a few nightly Christmas festivities this year, and from my observations the man-woman dynamics are just the same, at least in ‘relaxed’, social settings.
And when booze get involved, men are just as initiative and stupid as before — they don’t care (or know?) that women have the upper hand and can basically decide the man’s faith, if they choose to engage intimately with him.

We need some more outrageous lies and claims from the ordinary woman, and not just women in power positions to wake men the f~~~ up.
But, maybe, the ordinary cupcake won’t bother crying wolf, because she knows she’ll gain very little from it.

[OldBillParticipant]

MGTOW Monk wrote:

I’ve already seen articles about Florida Senators refusing to meet with high level Lobbyist females alone.

There were articles posted here in 2015 about female staffers in both the US and UK governments making the same complaints. Politicians in both countries were refusing to meet with women alone, even women who worked for them. Female staffers were also being shut out of the officially-unoffical “social” events and junkets where most of the political networking and dealing occur.

Naturally the women in the articles were bitching about being treated like the untrustworthy c~~~s they are.

The mainstream media is calling this behavior the Pence Rule after the current US vice-president. Throughout his political career, he has consistently refused to meet with women alone and takes his wife to all political “social” events. The media pathetically attempts to spin this as an indication that Pence does not trust himself when the opposite is true. Pence wisely refuses to trust women and knows they will lie out of reflex.

The media also ignores the fact, most likely out of stupidity, that Harry Truman was doing the same thing over eighty years ago and for much the same reasons.

Truman owed his political career to the political machine which ran Kansas City. The Pendergasts first put him in a county administrative position and then the US Senate. Truman was the machine’s “honest man”, someone they could point to as scrupulously honest and competent when law enforcement and reformers attacked them for running Kansas City as a “wide open” city.

As the “Senator from Pendergast”, Truman had a bull’s eye on his back at which rival political bosses, reformers, law enforcement, and garden variety extortionists were constantly aiming. Attempts to run the “badger game” against him were made constantly both in Missouri and Washington but Truman’s ironclad rule to never be in a room alone with a woman who wasn’t an immediate relative protected him for over a decade.

Truman was no saint. He enjoyed bourbon and poker, his Senate office quickly became a place where other Senators could get a drink after hours and often did. Truman never drank or gambled in front of women however. He habitually stood when women entered the room, something which can be explained by his Victorian upbringing and which can also be explained as giving him a reason to leave the room if it seemed like he was about to be set-up.

Truman was such a moral and honest man that, after leaving the Presidency, his only income was his WW1 army pension. The man who had controlled millions in spending in Kansas City and billions of spending in DC left office without any of that money “sticking” to him. It’s said that immediately after FDR’s death, J. Edgar Hoover consulted his “fifteen filing cabinets of political cancer” in which he’d squirreled away dirt on politicians nationwide only to find he had no dirt on Truman.

Truman’s example is the one more and more man will be following as this 21st Century witch hunt plays out. Formal manners and segregation are a man’s only defense against the rabid c~~~s stalking the workplace and social sphere.

This is the world women wanted, brothers. It’s our duty to give it to them good and hard.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[AttonParticipant]

I think business will do the right thing and get rid of the corporate woman. They are a legal risk that is best done away with.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Anonymous 42]

Predictions for Endgame of #MeToo Backlash?\

Men walking away from traditional roles at the same time rejecting the expectations of the new roles modern women expect of them.

In other words depressed miserable women and single happy men that walked away from them and all the headf~~~ery they have to offer.

I know I had enough decades ago and never returned!

Moustopia is in fill swing!

[Anonymous 54]

I have noticed women acting more polite.

They know were p~~~ed. off.

[AntipathyParticipant 4901]

Once you read a little history, and do a little math, it’s simple to see where this is headed. Every civilization in history, wherein feminism had risen from the decay, the civilization imploded and collapsed shortly after.

Right now it’s the lower level echelon of the elites being purged, the TV hosts, the hollywood guys, political figures, pro athletes etc. Some on here are asking the question “will they go after the average Joe’s next”.

I don’t know if you’ve noticed, they already did. Look at the incarceration numbers for men, look at the culture on college campus’, take a look at your workplace and what HR departments have done to them. Take a look at the courts and the entire justice system as a whole.

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

Any Predictions for Endgame of #MeToo Backlash?

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

I have heard that will not meet with any woman alone from all kinds of men in politics. Starting with the VP.
Women have gone all in on the possible chance of taking out a sitting president. Damned any consequences. Even the woman must see all of this is going to be short term gain and the long term is going to be one hell of a price.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[JakeParticipant 909]

it gets worse real quick as you get less victims there isn’t enough to go around and then even more make a run for it manginas start to change when you see freedom you embrace it and know the difference, side note you enjoy being an asshole peace

[AntipathyParticipant 4901]

743 roadmaster wrote:

I have heard that will not meet with any woman alone from all kinds of men in politics. Starting with the VP.

[Author]

Posts