Another rant from Return of Kings

[MgtowWaveParticipant 4352]

If a bunch of feminists ass raped roosh/rok with a strap on dildo you will not see me shed a tear.

frankly my dear i don't give a damn

[Al BundyParticipant 245]

The author is a closet homosexual. Almost all the PUAs are. Thus the desperate need to tell the world just how much they adore the old snot slot, how they just can’t do without it, and how men who choose not to pursue it must be pathological in some way. I would have a measure of respect for these men if they had the courage to come out as the homosexuals they so obviously are. Their sad obsession with MGTOW is a manifestation of this repression/denial/avoidance complex. Gotta keep up appearances!

[W]e are MGTOW. We eat shaming language like tic tacs.

--chir

I have known more men destroyed by the desire to have wife and child and to keep them in comfort than I have seen destroyed by drink and harlots.

--William Butler Yeats

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

MgtowWave wrote:

If a bunch of feminists ass raped roosh/rok with a strap on dildo you will not see me shed a tear.

It would be especially hilarious if they were Roosh’s victims.
I actually agree that Roosh is probably a rapist. How come the system put Cosby on trial but not Roosh or Clinton?

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

ROK’s MGTOW articles are patronising and condescending. It’s like a 14 year old trying to teach grandma how to suck eggs.

What they don’t understand is that there’s a large number of MGTOWs who have already done the casual plate spinning, LTRs, marriage and been through the wringer in the divorce courts.

Many of us have already walked the path that they are walking and come out the other side.

[Anonymous 2]

Return of Kings is a f~~~ing joke. One second they act all anti-feminist, then the next they go bashing MGTOWs because they don’t want to take part in gynocentrism. Are they just too f~~~ing stupid to realize that they are falling right into the hands of feminists? I seriously thought some of these articles were written by feminists, spewing the whole “Your manliness is measured by your ability to get pussy, and if you aren’t constantly getting laid, then you need to start questioning your manhood!”

I do not spend my money on women, period! Especially when it’s a “Buy me some drinks and an expensive dinner and MAYBE we’ll f~~~ tonight!” No thanks! My money will stay in my hands and will only be spent on me! The last thing I want to spend my hard earned money on is some entitled c~~~ who thinks she deserves to have me spend my money on her just because she has a t~~~ between her legs!

Besides, the guy that wrote one of the MGTOW bashing articles, Matt Forney, was shown to be a fat overweight f~~~ who looked just like the picture of the fat guy in the basement that can’t get laid. Pot and kettle, folks.

[OgreParticipant 5863]

Maybe it’s the beer, but I couldn’t get a singular idea from his long rant.

You don’t like MGTOW don’t be one. If you aren’t one how can you break them into two groups and assert how you think the idea is moving.

Read the guys bio on the left side of the page. It screams, “I’m a boring person attempting to seem interesting, TO GET CHICKS”.

Who’s pathetic? I thought maybe the whole article might have something of value, but no, just more mushy BS. Hopefully they starve and the google hits increase menbership here.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[Anonymous 54]

Do not fall for divide and conquer tactics. Puas are ALL a bunch of sorry ass little motherf~~~ers who cant get past there need for there Mothers aproval.

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

In some ways, the downfall of Roosh is a tragedy.

Roosh is good in some ways. He says some true stuff about misandry and women. I also find his backstory to be rather impressive. He is the offspring of two Muslim immigrants. His dad is an Iranian Muslim and his mom is Armenian. Sometimes, the children of Middle Eastern immigrants become terrorists. Other times, the kids of immigrants join the left and become “Muslim feminists”. Instead, Roosh joined the manosphere and became one of its high-ranking members. Roosh is living proof that Muslim immigrants can become integrated into the manosphere.

Additionally, Roosh is very eloquent and tends to have an interesting, engaging writing style.

Unfortunatly, Roosh has chosen the wrong part of the manosphere. He’s trying to force his ideas about Islamic masculinity on us while he rams his halal shlong into unconsenting women.

The saddest thing about Roosh is this: He could have been a successful Muslim immigrant MGTOW … but he just barely missed the mark and now he is throwing the rest of the manosphere under the bus. He makes us look bad.

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[LightBringerParticipant 440]

Keymaster wrote:

ROK already humiliated themselves and they just keep going back for more.

Matt Forney Fatt Horny alaredy humiliated himself beyond recognition.

Is Tom = keymaster?

I see in that image some guy named covinus or something, Ithink he might be another writer on that site, I like that site, but some of the authors, that guy being one are TOTAL jokes, espousing pseduo intellectualism.

[SamsquanchParticipant 4226]

The fact that he had a disclaimer at the beginning of the article completely invalidates whatever he writes.

[FermatParticipant 3478]

Kings? What kings? All I see are servants who are scared of disappointing their Queen.

I have discovered a truly remarkable list of reasons why women are not necessary for a happy life, but alas this margin is too small to contain it.

[Anonymous 3]

BigD wrote:

I’m pretty sure everyone is feeling what I am speaking. PUA have decided to label us something so they can feel better about not having enough cash three days before payday to buy a pizza. Stooping to their level and pointing out how wrong they are isn’t going to do anyone a damn good bit of sense. When they are tired of being broke or end up in baby jail, they’ll learn. If not, who cares? The information is out there, they’re just too lazy to read it. If they want to continue down the path of self destruction, there is nothing we can do. Just sit back, relax, pop a beer and watch the fireworks.

Exactly. There is a place for education, but there are already books and videos for that, and there’s this forum. If they’re too ignorant to see it, they will just have to ‘learn by the rocks’ (as Robert Maxwell once put it, appropriately enough).

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

Fermat wrote:

Kings? What kings? All I see are servants who are scared of disappointing their Queen.

They’re almost as pathetic as these kings.

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

Women need men to be desperate for women. Women need men to over value women. The higher their value, the more they can expect to gain from men desperate to acquire them. This causes me to question the honesty of the way women react when I walk away from them.

But if ROK is selling to desperate men some mechanism of increased access to women, then ROK needs men to be desperate for women, and to vastly over value them… in order for their business model to work. Men who don’t value women and won’t offer any resources in order to acquire them will wreck their business model. ROK believe that women have value to a man, and ROK needs men to believe that as well.

In a way, ROK and women both need me to believe something which I have found to be untrue in my own experience. If ROK could acknowledge that, they would realize that they have the same credibility with me as near-wall women do. Both desperately need me to believe something in order for their plans for acquiring resources from me to work.

I suspect it is the same with all mgtow members. And since they value access to women so much, and I don’t, I can acknowledge that I have zero credibility with them.

Given these realities, it seems a waste of time for mgtow and rok to address each other further…

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[AFTParticipant 2722]

The fact is, not just women are guilty of attention whoring.

PUA by definition need “MEN” to admire their skill at acquiring a rather large notch count of STD’s.

Without men’s approval, OUR approval, PUA is no big thing.

As for the fact that there are lethargic, unmotivated, lazy MGTOW, well YEAH, s~~~ we come from all walks of life: successful, unsuccessful, honest, dishonest, lazy and hard working, that’s just human nature.

MGTOW is a place of sanctity, where I come to read, think, learn and understand, I do all my ass kicking at work, and on my projects, I need my MGTOW time to keep myself balanced and my Zen in Harmony.

Let the PUA get squeezed, I prefer to enjoy my juice free and loose.

When the war cemeteries are half full of the corpses of dead conscripted women, only then will women have earned the right to speak of equality. Sidecar “A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and goes to bed at night and in between does what he wants to do.” - Bob Dylan

[Frank V.Participant 2445]

MonkeyMind wrote:

I’ve no idea why ROK bothers to write these articles on MGTOW, i don’t even understand what they’re talking about. It’s just all bulls~~~.

I have always suspected that some of the MRAs see themselves as having “started” MGTOW and do not like “losing control” over it.

I tend to think that MGTOW has deeper roots and they never really had “control” like they thought they had.

That’s my impression from the general tone of what I have read, but I can’t claim to have really read a wide array of MRA stuff recently.

Frank V.

[Frank V.Participant 2445]

A follow up to my last post.

Also, for Traditionalist MRAs, MGTOW is a real threat for simply suggesting possible alternatives to their agenda.

How dare MGTOWs suggest that a man can be defined by anything other than a wife and kids !

How dare MGTOWs upset the applecart of gender and social roles that Traditionalists seem so deeply invested in !

Traditionalists, be they MRAs or guys like Milo, are not really our friends. They see it as in their interests for us to return to the plantation.

Frank V.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Fermat wrote:

Kings? What kings?

Oh kings now it makes sense. I thought it was Return Of the Kunts after I saw the rant.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Do what you will. It is not my place to tell you what to do.

I have chosen to go my own way.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Frank V.Participant 2445]

ROK wants to save Traditionalist Marriage.

Well, The Hapsburgs tried to The Austro-Hungarian Empire.

We’ve seen this play before.

Frank V.

[Author]

Posts