Another CSA (Child Support Agency) f~~~ up in the UK

[Bestieboy666Participant 2358]

Man can’t get refund on £31,000 child support payments despite DNA proving he’s NOT father.
He said:”I had a one night stand with the mother of this girl on two occasions. She was with a boyfriend at the time.
“She obviously looked at me like a cash cow. It was a fling 23 years ago and the girl is now 22-years-old.
“I work in a nightclub and the CSA contacted my employers and took my money. They accepted her word with no proof at all. I always said she was not my child.
“I wore protection which I know is not 100 per cent – but from day one I knew she was not my child.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/man-cant-refund-31000-child-4074479

One letter written by a CSA manager in August 2013 – referring to a private DNA test – said: “If this shows that he is not the parent of the child then he will be refunded back any money he has made (sic).”
But a Department of Work and Pensions source said such a rebate would not be considered if the paternity test was taken after the child had become an adult and the case was closed.

Women are so bad, if they changed the law so I kept the house, I still wouldn't marry one. I'd rather be homeless.

[UnicronParticipant 752]

The CSA is run by Women (as is 90% of the Department of Work and Pensions) and like all things with a female majority it is unfit for purpose and a total clusterf~~~ of an organisation. .

Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.

[AttonParticipant]

DNA tests they should be mandatory, why they aren’t is beyond me.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[The Long WalkParticipant 1282]

Atton wrote:

DNA tests they should be mandatory, why they aren’t is beyond me.

Yep. Where government sanctioned extortion is concerned, they should at least be certain they’re tapping into the right guy’s income.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

Sounds like theft. I don’t know how men can still live in that country.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Anonymous 3]

What the hell! That’s very extreme! Given those stupid error in the laws, one could pay child support for random people!

[VarunParticipant 2981]

See how dangerous it is when you get involved with women?

Even if you wear protection, even if it gets proved that you’re not someone’s father, you WILL lose money if you get involved with a female. Complete loss. Don’t even think about justice.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22520]

Bestieboy666 wrote:

But a Department of Work and Pensions source said such a rebate would not be considered if the paternity test was taken after the child had become an adult and the case was closed.

Think about this.

Mother of adult daughter falsely claims man is father, the government takes money from the man, then when is comes out the man is not the daughter’s father, the government says it will not pay back the stolen money because the daughter is already an adult. Even thought the government stole the money from the man AFTER the daughter became adult.

This is open theft, no matter how you look at it.

The situation actually has legs for a legal argument.

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

So, a woman has stolen money from a man with state sanction, what else is new?

[Author]

Posts