Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Another CSA (Child Support Agency) f~~~ up in the UK
This topic contains 8 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by hellraider 3 years, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Man can’t get refund on £31,000 child support payments despite DNA proving he’s NOT father.
He said:”I had a one night stand with the mother of this girl on two occasions. She was with a boyfriend at the time.
“She obviously looked at me like a cash cow. It was a fling 23 years ago and the girl is now 22-years-old.
“I work in a nightclub and the CSA contacted my employers and took my money. They accepted her word with no proof at all. I always said she was not my child.
“I wore protection which I know is not 100 per cent – but from day one I knew she was not my child.http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/man-cant-refund-31000-child-4074479
One letter written by a CSA manager in August 2013 – referring to a private DNA test – said: “If this shows that he is not the parent of the child then he will be refunded back any money he has made (sic).”
But a Department of Work and Pensions source said such a rebate would not be considered if the paternity test was taken after the child had become an adult and the case was closed.Women are so bad, if they changed the law so I kept the house, I still wouldn't marry one. I'd rather be homeless.
The CSA is run by Women (as is 90% of the Department of Work and Pensions) and like all things with a female majority it is unfit for purpose and a total clusterf~~~ of an organisation. .
Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.
DNA tests they should be mandatory, why they aren’t is beyond me.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
DNA tests they should be mandatory, why they aren’t is beyond me.
Yep. Where government sanctioned extortion is concerned, they should at least be certain they’re tapping into the right guy’s income.
Sounds like theft. I don’t know how men can still live in that country.
I bathe in the tears of single moms.
Anonymous3What the hell! That’s very extreme! Given those stupid error in the laws, one could pay child support for random people!
See how dangerous it is when you get involved with women?
Even if you wear protection, even if it gets proved that you’re not someone’s father, you WILL lose money if you get involved with a female. Complete loss. Don’t even think about justice.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
But a Department of Work and Pensions source said such a rebate would not be considered if the paternity test was taken after the child had become an adult and the case was closed.
Think about this.
Mother of adult daughter falsely claims man is father, the government takes money from the man, then when is comes out the man is not the daughter’s father, the government says it will not pay back the stolen money because the daughter is already an adult. Even thought the government stole the money from the man AFTER the daughter became adult.
This is open theft, no matter how you look at it.
The situation actually has legs for a legal argument.
So, a woman has stolen money from a man with state sanction, what else is new?
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678