Another article on Sex Robots…

[SirrealismParticipant 59]

So yesterday i saw the Japanese virtual machine and wondered if there were porn for the Samsung VR. Did a quick search and found a bunch. So with a flashlight and Samsung VR we are getting closer.
Might even order a VR. Anyone have one?

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Suggestius wrote:

If you are married a robot then no one else can grab your s~~~ in case of you bit the big one.

Good point—does the “married” robot become your heir at law?

[Puffin StuffParticipant 25019]

Can they repossess your wife?

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12053]

Nope.
I’m not going to marry Sheila (my future sex robot).
EVER.
Marriage is for gays.

PistolPete wrote:

Does this mean the robot can divorce you as well?

No, it does mean that some women would prefer marrying it.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 3]

By 2050 I doubt anyone on here will still have any sex drive.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 25019]

I’ll be 90 and there ain’t no way I’m making 90, I like to live a little.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Anonymous 5]

Marrying a f~~~ing robot? Having sex with a f~~~ing robot? Lmfao, some of you guys are deluded, and partly insane. This world is getting sicker by the day, the though of standing before a judge, saying I do to a f~~~ing piece of machine is ridiculous. MGTOW is about men going their own ways, living life to the fullest, and not having to deal with a nagging bitch. But, it doesn’t mean you can’t f~~~ a female, or even be in a relationship with one. Any man, that have sex with a robot, or a doll, is in deep need for intense therapy. Sex is between two human beings, not some plastic crap, or a piece of machinery. I know some of you will probably say, “I had a crazy divorce”, well broski, why did you get married in the first place? You could’ve get married without a license, but you had to involve the state in your personal life, right? Answer the f~~~ing question! Before I knew about MGTOW, I wanted to get married, but of course, without a license. And my wife would’ve been a foreign woman, definitely not American. But again, I’m only 23, there’s some things I don’t know, yet. But seriously, let go of that robot s~~~.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12053]

Anonymous wrote:

MGTOW is about men going their own ways, living life to the fullest, and not having to deal with a nagging bitch. But, it doesn’t mean you can’t f~~~ a female, or even be in a relationship with one.

Right.

Anonymous wrote:

Any man, that have sex with a robot, or a doll, is in deep need for intense therapy. Sex is between two human beings, not some plastic crap, or a piece of machinery.

I smell tuna.
Firstly you said that “you CAN have sex and even relationships with women”.
Then, the next line you said that whose who haven’t with women are sick.
So it reads “you MUST have sex with a woman”.
Female pattern detected.

Anonymous wrote:

I know some of you will probably say, “I had a crazy divorce”, well broski, why did you get married in the first place?

I smell tuna.
Female pattern detected.
It’s ALSO my fault, of course.
But laws aren’t my fault…

Anonymous wrote:

You could’ve get married without a license, but you had to involve the state in your personal life, right? Answer the f~~~ing question!

You don’t know what you’re talking about: in many states even cohabitations give rights to women and duties to men.
In Canada, Australia and Sweden cohabiting with awoman or marrying a woman it’s almost the same thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Before I knew about MGTOW, I wanted to get married, but of course, without a license. And my wife would’ve been a foreign woman, definitely not American. But again, I’m only 23, there’s some things I don’t know, yet. But seriously, let go of that robot s~~~.

Some men are beyond your weaknesses.
Rejecting some options due “immorality” it’s a weakness.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[narwhalParticipant]

No way people are marrying robots by 2050. Before that happens. a robot has to be considered a legal, free thinking being. You cannot marry something that cannot chose to marry you. So we are talking a ton of technological advances.

And then you have to consider the legal controversy. Will people who believe God creates life be able to accept that a ‘man created life’ is their equal.

So then you have to ask, why the hell would you chose marriage over ownership? You don’t want your sex robot to be able to divorce you. You don’t want it draining your bank account. You don’t want it taking your kids away from you. You don’t want it to have a headache. The whole point of have a robot instead of a wife is that you don’t have to marry it to get the benefits.

No, we’ll be in another age before people start marrying robots.

Ok. Then do it.

[Anonymous 5]

@eric Lauder You’ve clearly misunderstood my comment! I never said, if a man doesn’t have sex with a woman, he’s sick. I said, if he’s having sex with a doll, or a robot, he’s clearly a sick man. Some MGTOWs are monks, who doesn’t give a damn about sex, and that’s completely normal. But, if you claim to be a monk, yet you use dolls and machine to get off, than that monk lifestyle is hurting you. Completely avoiding women is not the foundation of MGTOW.

I never stated that what happened to you after the divorce is your fault. But, it’s partly your fault for getting into a contract, with the female and the state. Stop acting like child, and take some responsibility for your actions.

MGTOW is not feminism, we can’t hate women, because if we do, than we’re no different than feminists. My point was, if you feel the need to f~~~ a machine, than the monk mode is hurting you. Personally, I think the monk mode is awesome, and one day I pray that I’ll enter the monk phase.

[narwhalParticipant]

@Baylem93. You’re new hear, it does not look very well on you to immediately jump in and start insulting regulars, or the habits of these regulars. It shows very little respect, and you will get little respect in return.

Anonymous wrote:

@eric Lauder You’ve clearly misunderstood my comment! I never said, if a man doesn’t have sex with a woman, he’s sick. I said, if he’s having sex with a doll, or a robot, he’s clearly a sick man.

Why is he a sick man? Can you give a reason for that? Is a man sick if he masturbates with his hand? If not, then what is the difference between his hand and a machine?

Do you hold women to these same standards? Is a woman who uses a vibrator or a dildo a sick woman?

Anonymous wrote:

Completely avoiding women is not the foundation of MGTOW.

So you assume that a man who uses a robot or choses not to have sex with women is avoiding women? And actually, Going Your Own Way can completely include avoiding women, in part or entirely.

Ok. Then do it.

[Anonymous 5]

@narwha I didn’t disrespect anyone, and please, read my statement again. Masturbating is completely normal, and a woman using a vibrato seems strange to me. Going monk is awesome, and I wish I can get to that level. But, using a machine? Come on! I don’t trust humans, so trusting a machine that was made by humans, would be insane. We need to stop dreaming, and come into reality. Viruses, malfunction, just to name a few things that could go wrong. I respect every man, that’s on this platform, because we all have a story, and it’s not pretty.

[narwhalParticipant]

You’re backtracking.

Many of the men here use fleshlights, a machine. You claimed that such a lifestyle was hurting them.

Anonymous wrote:

But, if you claim to be a monk, yet you use dolls and machine to get off, than that monk lifestyle is hurting you.

In other places you said it was sick.

Now I suppose you could make an argument that it wasn’t disrespectful, just naïve, or judgmental, but it’s semantics. Perhaps you don’t think of fleshlights as a machine. Whatever.

Ok. Then do it.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12053]

Sirrealism wrote:

So yesterday i saw the Japanese virtual machine and wondered if there were porn for the Samsung VR. Did a quick search and found a bunch. So with a flashlight and Samsung VR we are getting closer.
Might even order a VR. Anyone have one?

No, it should be at least 288 Hz, 288 frames-per-second, 4 times the 72p (72 full frames per second) that is actually claimed to be the most natural and better quality for pure 2D. In fact it should be higher, since the higher limit for 2D is probably about 90-100 fps, so a VR system should be, ideally, capable to reach 360-400 fps.
The actual resolution doesn’t matter so much: according tests a 1280×720 movie at 75 fps is perceived as having much better quality and even more resolution than a 1920×1080 movie at 60 fps.

Actually Samsung VR works at 30 fps, with a resolution of 3840×2160: that’s not how healthy VR could work.
Give me a 1280×720 with at least 288 Hz and I’ll buy it.

Anonymous wrote:

@eric Lauder You’ve clearly misunderstood my comment! I never said, if a man doesn’t have sex with a woman, he’s sick. I said, if he’s having sex with a doll, or a robot, he’s clearly a sick man. Some MGTOWs are monks, who doesn’t give a damn about sex, and that’s completely normal. But, if you claim to be a monk, yet you use dolls and machine to get off, than that monk lifestyle is hurting you.

If a man don’t have orgasms then he’s sick, so much that pure chastity for healthy men doesn’t exist and even athletes who have to avoid it have spontaneous ejaculations.
The difference between spontaneous ejaculations, masturbation with hand, using a fleshlight, using a doll, using a sex robot: it’s all in your head. It’s still, always, having ejaculations/orgasms without a woman.

Anonymous wrote:

Completely avoiding women is not the foundation of MGTOW.

Completely avoiding giving to women rights on your stuff is the foundation of MGTOW.
Hence why no “marriage, no cohabitation”.

Anonymous wrote:

MGTOW is not feminism, we can’t hate women, because if we do, than we’re no different than feminists. My point was, if you feel the need to f~~~ a machine, than the monk mode is hurting you. Personally, I think the monk mode is awesome, and one day I pray that I’ll enter the monk phase.

There’s no such thing as pure chastity for a man.
And if don’t have orgasms for enough, then even your testosterone level drops: that’s unhealthy.
I have a daughter, a sister, a mother, and I love all them. I even still have a more than decent human relationship with my ex-wife.
There’s nothing about hatred in such affirmation: my dick is mine, and I choose how to satisfy it.
Sex is the main thing that keeps a man in chains before a woman: it’s a so much powerful female weapon that feminists attack men’s sexuality and try to restrict it, because they know that that in most cases that will simply raise the price of the pussy and just only in very few cases it will result in men not bothering anymore about having sex with women.
Fact is that sex is the only weapon that they have, take sex away from them and they’re nothing. That’s not because “men view women as sex objects” as feminists love to allege. That’s because women don’t make efforts to be assertive, entertaining, and so on. An assertive woman asking a man out and then making efforts to be interesting and entertaining could easily raise her worth well beyond her sex value. But that’s not how women works, it’s far beyond the vast majority (almost the totality) of them: that’s why MGTOW works, otherwise it could not even exist. That’s also why female separatism never worked: because even if they did try to be separatists there were still a lot of men assertively hitting on them and trying to please them.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 5]

At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter, do what thou wilt! If you want to f~~~ a robot, than so be it.

Instead of f~~~ing a robot, I’ll rather stroke my c~~~ to porn. I don’t believe in relationships, marriage, and cohabitation. I’m getting a vasectomy next year, so f~~~ing female’s won’t be a problem for me.

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

Anonymous wrote:

At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter, do what thou wilt! If you want to f~~~ a robot, than so be it.

Instead of f~~~ing a robot, I’ll rather stroke my c~~~ to porn. I don’t believe in relationships, marriage, and cohabitation. I’m getting a vasectomy next year, so f~~~ing female’s won’t be a problem for me.

Good luck with the false rape accusations….

The thing about the perfect sex-robot is that it removes the needs of the biological counterpart. If/when a robot that can act as a maid as well as a sex-robot, will be the day women will become obsolete, even for blue-pill men.

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[Author]

Posts